General Discussion

"That is not much in the way of proof. A short video doesnt show much at all of what? 12 hours of daylight?"

That is a position. A pretty undeniable one. Your position is to question the evidence that clearly shows absence of violence - the expected condition where violence doesn't take place. Your position being patently absurd does not erase its existence.

So I asked you a question about a position you did take knowing full well that it is so absurd, it doesn't warrant a straight response. And I never expected an answer from you. That's the nature of a rhetorical question.

Now, about rhetorical questions: their purpose is to respond to positions whose absurdity is so obvious that they do not warrant straight answers.

Does this explanation put my question into a proper perspective for you? No?

Jeez...

And don't judge me by your standards. Don't presume I spend hours of non-response to your posts in search of a better response. I have a life, you know. And believe it or not, it is filled petty little nothings that take precedence to paying attention to your posts.

Which reminds me: I have to go out and watch my grass grow now. Good bye.