Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Page 562 of the House Bill!!! [View all]
One paragraph, on pages 562 and 563 of the 1,116-page bill, raised alarms for reasons that have nothing to do with America's budget or safety-net programs or debt. That paragraph invokes a federal rule for civil court procedures, requiring anyone seeking an injunction or temporary restraining order to block an action by the Trump administration to post a financial bond.
Want to challenge Trump? Pay up, the provision said in a way that could make it financially prohibitive for Americans to contest Trump's actions in court.
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, called that "unprecedented."
"The greatest impact will be in preventing enforcement of all existing temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions if a bond has not been posted and rarely were there bonds required," Chemerinsky wrote me in an email.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-most-beautiful-part-of-trump-s-bill-is-it-helps-him-defy-federal-courts-opinion/ar-AA1FqVlD?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=0815ae706b9f4d5bbce96ad4f5e8c452&ei=26
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does being as unconstitutional as the poll tax matter? No, not in today's U.S.. We've gone backwards. Justice and access
artemisia1
May 2025
#1
The provision is unwise and should be defeated but its not an unconstitutional "poll tax"
onenote
May 2025
#10
Look at Trump's Memorandum: "Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c)"
sop
May 2025
#2
Yep, that's what's in the bill... their complaint about lawsuits is such noxious BS. These people
LymphocyteLover
May 2025
#7
it's sick and fascist but OTOH, Federal courts haven't yet issued any contempt citations
LymphocyteLover
May 2025
#3
I understand that. But again, the courts are simply not issuing contempt citations
LymphocyteLover
May 2025
#8
I wonder...at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire, were there those who grasped
elocs
May 2025
#9
This has nothing to do with the budget and should not be in a reconciliation bill!
SunSeeker
May 2025
#21
