Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Trump administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(173,914 posts)3. Supreme Court blocks Trump from restarting Alien Enemies Act deportations
This makes me smile
Supreme Court blocks Trump from restarting Alien Enemies Act deportations
— (@trinnab.bsky.social) 2025-05-16T20:02:59.497Z
www.cnn.com/2025/05/16/p...
Link to tweet
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/16/politics/supreme-court-alien-enemies-act?cid=external-feeds_iluminar_google
The Supreme Court on Friday blocked President Donald Trump from moving forward with deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for a group of immigrants in northern Texas, siding with Venezuelans who feared they were poised for imminent removal under the sweeping wartime authority.
The decision is a significant loss for Trump, who wants to use the law to speed deportations and avoid the kind of review normally required before removing people from the country. But the decision is also temporary and the underlying legal fight over the presidents invocation has continued simultaneously in multiple federal courts across the country.
The justices sent the case back to an appeals court to decide the underlying questions in the case, including whether the presidents move is legal and if it is, how much notice the migrants targeted under the act should receive.
Two conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly noted their dissent.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
The decision is a significant loss for Trump, who wants to use the law to speed deportations and avoid the kind of review normally required before removing people from the country. But the decision is also temporary and the underlying legal fight over the presidents invocation has continued simultaneously in multiple federal courts across the country.
The justices sent the case back to an appeals court to decide the underlying questions in the case, including whether the presidents move is legal and if it is, how much notice the migrants targeted under the act should receive.
Two conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly noted their dissent.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Trump administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants [View all]
In It to Win It
May 2025
OP
Supreme Court blocks Trump from restarting Alien Enemies Act deportations
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2025
#3
Bring them back now and allow due process if they can prove their offenses are unlawful.
Deuxcents
May 2025
#4
Supreme Court rules Trump administration must give Venezuelans more time to challenge deportation under Alien Enemies Ac
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2025
#6
OK maybe I'll start hoping again. I was expecting them to sell us all up the river. And democracy.
lindysalsagal
May 2025
#7
and SCOTUS will get pissed and continue to vote against him in every case
LymphocyteLover
May 2025
#21
it's happening.... big question is whether they actually attack SCOTUS more directly
LymphocyteLover
May 2025
#50
So, with THIS ruling, if i read it right. That not just one person (Garcia) but ALL
bluestarone
May 2025
#22
This case is about the Venezuelan detainees being held in the Northern District of Texas, not Garcia. nt
sl8
May 2025
#25
"The issue isn't how SCOTUS rules. It's if these rulings will be complied with."
J_William_Ryan
May 2025
#28