Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening. [View all]
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/18/magazine/curtis-yarvin-interview.html
https://archive.ph/WwZBl
For a long time, Curtis Yarvin, a 51-year-old computer engineer, has written online about political theory in relative obscurity. His ideas were pretty extreme: that institutions at the heart of American intellectual life, like the mainstream media and academia, have been overrun by progressive groupthink and need to be dissolved. He believes that government bureaucracy should be radically gutted, and perhaps most provocative, he argues that American democracy should be replaced by what he calls a monarchy run by what he has called a C.E.O. basically his friendlier term for a dictator. To support his arguments, Yarvin relies on what those sympathetic to his views might see as a helpful serving of historical references and what others see as a highly distorting mix of gross oversimplification, cherry-picking and personal interpretation presented as fact.
But while Yarvin himself may still be obscure, his ideas are not. Vice President-elect JD Vance has alluded to Yarvins notions of forcibly ridding American institutions of so-called wokeism. The incoming State Department official Michael Anton has spoken with Yarvin about how an American Caesar might be installed into power. And Yarvin also has fans in the powerful, and increasingly political, ranks of Silicon Valley. Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist turned informal adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, has approvingly cited Yarvins anti-democratic thinking. And Peter Thiel, a conservative megadonor who invested in a tech start-up of Yarvins, has called him a powerful historian. Perhaps unsurprising given all this, Yarvin has become a fixture of the right-wing media universe: He has been a guest on the shows of Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, among others.
Ive been aware of Yarvin, who mostly makes his living on Substack, for years and was mostly interested in his work as a prime example of growing antidemocratic sentiment in particular corners of the internet. Until recently, those ideas felt fringe. But given that they are now finding an audience with some of the most powerful people in the country, Yarvin cant be so easily dismissed anymore.
One of your central arguments is that America needs to, as youve put it in the past, get over our dictator-phobia that American democracy is a sham, beyond fixing, and having a monarch-style leader is the way to go. So why is democracy so bad, and why would having a dictator solve the problem? Let me answer that in a way that would be relatively accessible to readers of The New York Times. Youve probably heard of a man named Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
snip
https://archive.ph/WwZBl
For a long time, Curtis Yarvin, a 51-year-old computer engineer, has written online about political theory in relative obscurity. His ideas were pretty extreme: that institutions at the heart of American intellectual life, like the mainstream media and academia, have been overrun by progressive groupthink and need to be dissolved. He believes that government bureaucracy should be radically gutted, and perhaps most provocative, he argues that American democracy should be replaced by what he calls a monarchy run by what he has called a C.E.O. basically his friendlier term for a dictator. To support his arguments, Yarvin relies on what those sympathetic to his views might see as a helpful serving of historical references and what others see as a highly distorting mix of gross oversimplification, cherry-picking and personal interpretation presented as fact.
But while Yarvin himself may still be obscure, his ideas are not. Vice President-elect JD Vance has alluded to Yarvins notions of forcibly ridding American institutions of so-called wokeism. The incoming State Department official Michael Anton has spoken with Yarvin about how an American Caesar might be installed into power. And Yarvin also has fans in the powerful, and increasingly political, ranks of Silicon Valley. Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist turned informal adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, has approvingly cited Yarvins anti-democratic thinking. And Peter Thiel, a conservative megadonor who invested in a tech start-up of Yarvins, has called him a powerful historian. Perhaps unsurprising given all this, Yarvin has become a fixture of the right-wing media universe: He has been a guest on the shows of Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, among others.
Ive been aware of Yarvin, who mostly makes his living on Substack, for years and was mostly interested in his work as a prime example of growing antidemocratic sentiment in particular corners of the internet. Until recently, those ideas felt fringe. But given that they are now finding an audience with some of the most powerful people in the country, Yarvin cant be so easily dismissed anymore.
One of your central arguments is that America needs to, as youve put it in the past, get over our dictator-phobia that American democracy is a sham, beyond fixing, and having a monarch-style leader is the way to go. So why is democracy so bad, and why would having a dictator solve the problem? Let me answer that in a way that would be relatively accessible to readers of The New York Times. Youve probably heard of a man named Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
snip
Hes anti-democracy and pro-Trump: the obscure dark enlightenment blogger influencing the next US administration
Key figures in the incoming administration follow Curtis Yarvin, whos pushing for an autocratic takeover of the US
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/21/curtis-yarvin-trump
Curtis Yarvin is hardly a household name in US politics. But the neoreactionary thinker and far-right blogger is emerging as a serious intellectual influence on key figures in Donald Trumps coming administration in particular over potential threats to US democracy.
Yarvin, who considers liberal democracy as a decadent enemy to be dismantled, is intellectually influential on vice president-elect JD Vance and close to several proposed Trump appointees. The aftermath of Trumps election victory has seen actions and rhetoric from Trump and his lieutenants that closely resemble Yarvins public proposals for taking autocratic power in America.
Trumps legal moves against critics in the media, Elon Musks promises to pare government spending to the bone, and the deployment of the Maga base against Republican lawmakers who have criticized controversial nominees like Pete Hegseth are among the measures that resemble elements of Yarvins strategy for displacing liberal democracy in the US.
One of the venues in which Yarvin has articulated the strategy include a podcast hosted by Michael Anton, a writer and academic whom Trump last week appointed to work in a senior role under secretary of state nominee Marco Rubio.
snip
Key figures in the incoming administration follow Curtis Yarvin, whos pushing for an autocratic takeover of the US
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/21/curtis-yarvin-trump
Curtis Yarvin is hardly a household name in US politics. But the neoreactionary thinker and far-right blogger is emerging as a serious intellectual influence on key figures in Donald Trumps coming administration in particular over potential threats to US democracy.
Yarvin, who considers liberal democracy as a decadent enemy to be dismantled, is intellectually influential on vice president-elect JD Vance and close to several proposed Trump appointees. The aftermath of Trumps election victory has seen actions and rhetoric from Trump and his lieutenants that closely resemble Yarvins public proposals for taking autocratic power in America.
Trumps legal moves against critics in the media, Elon Musks promises to pare government spending to the bone, and the deployment of the Maga base against Republican lawmakers who have criticized controversial nominees like Pete Hegseth are among the measures that resemble elements of Yarvins strategy for displacing liberal democracy in the US.
One of the venues in which Yarvin has articulated the strategy include a podcast hosted by Michael Anton, a writer and academic whom Trump last week appointed to work in a senior role under secretary of state nominee Marco Rubio.
snip
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening. [View all]
Celerity
Tuesday
OP
This is critical information in understanding current moves by the administration.
JohnnyLib2
Tuesday
#1
I agree that institutions tend to be problematic and don't address people's needs
LearnedHand
Tuesday
#7