Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(1,022 posts)
57. She will do what she thinks is best
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 01:38 AM
Jan 2025

And maybe there are some people who need her storytelling to understand what is happening to this country. I hope she can recruit more people to get into the game, so to speak.

But that is not our big problem, IMHO. Our big problem is that Dems have not pursued any big ideas for over 50 years, and tend to approach every new Republican move to insanity with "OK, we can't go to your extremes, so we'll only meet you at the halfway insane point." Then rinse and repeat, and it continues to shift the Overton Window farther and farther to the right.

Personally, I don't think we need rational, academic voices like Rachel's at the forefront. We have rationalized and normalized every step of the way, and now we have lost everything. We need bold leaders who are not afraid to advance a set of bold, populist ideas and fight for them tooth and nail.

What I am coming to is, what do you expect her to do the next 100 days? Tell more stories?

To heck with that. We need a revolution, not a rationalization. We need action, not understanding.

I know many people will feel comforted to have Rachel to lean on 5 days a weak. This is not a time to feel comfortable. This is a time to fight like hell, and I don't expect to hear any of that from MSNBC. That's not why Comcast keeps them around. Quite the opposite.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We may cause .............. Lovie777 Jan 2025 #1
Sorry, I won't be dissauded or even shamed or mocked for watching Maddow obamanut2012 Jan 2025 #2
Neither will I. Don't wanna watch, don't, but ragging about someone who gives every effort to inform isn't necessary Deuxcents Jan 2025 #3
Thank you obamanut2012 Jan 2025 #12
She continues to ignore the Bush 2000 election theft GoreWon2000 Jan 2025 #14
Please let us know if she happens to mention anything significant Bluetus Jan 2025 #19
I agree with you wholeheartedly Marigold Jan 2025 #21
I will be dropping Comcast programming soon Bluetus Jan 2025 #22
Just saying... TommyT139 Jan 2025 #56
She will do what she thinks is best Bluetus Jan 2025 #57
I like Rachel - I think she does a good job. Who do you think is better? walkingman Jan 2025 #4
Rachel and Lawrence are the best, hands down. Meadowoak Jan 2025 #6
A zillion RECs bluestarone Jan 2025 #8
I love Rachel choie Jan 2025 #17
I also like Democracy Now "The war and peace report" - the tend to focus more on walkingman Jan 2025 #20
Someone is standing up to him orangecrush Jan 2025 #5
KO railed against Jr every damn night and all it got him was fired. Ferrets are Cool Jan 2025 #11
It does more than that orangecrush Jan 2025 #18
I welcome Rachel back but you are correct malaise Jan 2025 #7
I learned so much from watching Rachel before, I'm really glad she's back. Meadowoak Jan 2025 #13
I am a big fan of her domestic politics know how malaise Jan 2025 #16
Nothing will save us now that democracy is dead. We can't rely on sham elections or sham governments yaesu Jan 2025 #9
Olbermann didn't save us from Jr, as much as he tried to do so. Ferrets are Cool Jan 2025 #10
of course not, but Rachel can help us to educate ourselves, and be prepared for what's coming. Meadowoak Jan 2025 #15
it will take each and everyone of us proud patriot Jan 2025 #23
WTF Skittles Jan 2025 #24
Who's obeying in advance? erodriguez Jan 2025 #32
it's important to give ratings to people still willing to speak out Skittles Jan 2025 #33
Sorry I can't disagree more. erodriguez Jan 2025 #36
WaPo just dropped "Democracy Dies in Darkness." Think Bezos isn't a fascist?? Evolve Dammit Jan 2025 #25
I'll be watching Rachel and Nicole, badhair77 Jan 2025 #26
Good lord. madamesilverspurs Jan 2025 #27
There are other voices. That aren't edited on what they can and cannot say. erodriguez Jan 2025 #43
There are many voices. madamesilverspurs Jan 2025 #48
I like Rachel because shes slightlv Jan 2025 #28
I listened to Rachel Jrsygrl96 Jan 2025 #29
Oh thank you! Woodwizard Jan 2025 #31
So what is your plan? From what outlet will you broadcast to millions? How's your research team? Hekate Jan 2025 #30
Is Rachel Maddow the only legitimate news source? erodriguez Jan 2025 #34
Never said she was the one and only. So what's your plan? Hekate Jan 2025 #35
What's my plan for what? How I will be using my time instead of watching corporate news? erodriguez Jan 2025 #38
Independent media isnt going to save us either. Eko Jan 2025 #37
I'm not arguing they will. We have to save ourselves. erodriguez Jan 2025 #39
Pinning hopes on media is insane. Eko Jan 2025 #41
? erodriguez Jan 2025 #44
Here. Eko Jan 2025 #46
Are you saying that chasing the latest media narrative is a loser? Bluetus Jan 2025 #58
I am saying that Eko Jan 2025 #59
Rachel Maddow doesn't do gotchas. Why are you lumping her in with the whores ? JI7 Jan 2025 #40
You're right she doesn't do gotchas. She does hopium. erodriguez Jan 2025 #45
She does a job and gets paid for it JI7 Jan 2025 #55
Maddow warned against the American oligarchy mzmolly Jan 2025 #53
I don't know, dude. MSNBC was must-watch television Politicub Jan 2025 #42
Agree. mzmolly Jan 2025 #50
Much as I admire Rachel canetoad Jan 2025 #47
I'm going to support every liberal voice mzmolly Jan 2025 #49
Fox News is not just "corporate news". It is the Republican Party on air. GoodRaisin Jan 2025 #51
Exactly mzmolly Jan 2025 #52
... betsuni Jan 2025 #54
Corporate media vs a random blogger with an agenda, what's the difference? krawhitham Jan 2025 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow and corpora...»Reply #57