Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Merrick Garland is Getting a Bum Rap (posting because we don't have enough controversy here ;)) [View all]LeftInTX
(31,840 posts)38. If Trump indicted in 2021. Gets put on hold due to immunity question. Immunity question settled in July 2022
I don't know where it leads. But then there would have been a flurry of this and that and how many months before the trial could begin? Henry Cuellar was indicted in May 2024. His court case is scheduled for June 2025. (One year)
So without the immunity question Trump's actual trial would probably have started in 2023
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Merrick Garland is Getting a Bum Rap (posting because we don't have enough controversy here ;)) [View all]
LauraInLA
Jan 16
OP
Article good read with lots of facts. Harry Litman an American lawyer, law professor, former dep. ast. AG. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 16
#1
Pretending Garland is the real victim in all of this might be a good PR strategy.
Irish_Dem
Jan 16
#2
Anyone still defending this poor bastard should compare how long he took to appoint a Special Counsel for Trump vs Biden
W_HAMILTON
Jan 16
#3
The SKorean prez was much more overt with a very publicly directed coup attempt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 16
#16
You really can. Yoon did. He put official machinery in motion. tRump did not, pretended to be uninvolved
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 16
#21
I get that Smith is being a Garland apologist. But, if he'd been assigned to work on this a year earlier
lees1975
Jan 16
#24
Garland himself on first taking office should've taken charge of investigating...
brush
Wednesday
#53
The fact that you don't see even ONE of Biden's people praise or defend Garland says it all
thebigidea
Jan 16
#26
I think they were waiting on the election. Once Trump won, things were pretty much dropped.
LeftInTX
Jan 16
#37
It was nothing short of delusional to think this SCOTUS was going to permit Trump to be convicted in any trial
dsc
Jan 16
#42