Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(122,364 posts)
9. Harry Litman is a moron and Merrick Garland is an agent of Satan.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:49 PM
Jan 16

That would be the same Harry Litman who's been lauded and extensively quoted right here on DU. The selfsame Harry Litman who is a former law clerk for SCOTUS Justices Thurgood Marshall and Anthony Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney and Deputy Assistant AG in the Clinton administration and is now a law professor and regular commentator on MSNBC. That Harry Litman, the one we used to love and cite regularly. Nevertheless, now we know that he's a moron because he has tragically failed to recognize that Merrick Garland is an agent of Satan. I'm not sure why the devout Catholic Joe Biden would have appointed an agent of Satan but obviously he did. And now Litman has committed the heresy of arguing that even if Garland had indicted Trump as soon as had been humanly possible, or even if Sally Yates or Jesus Christ had been the AG instead of Garland, the cases against Trump could not have been completed in time for the 2024 election. Litman says that the interference of Judge Cannon and the immunity decision by SCOTUS would have stopped the process in its tracks no matter when it started! How ridiculous! How would a guy like Harry Litman have the faintest idea how the federal criminal process even works? It was all Garland's fault, every bit of it, and anyone who suggests otherwise must be a craven tool of Trump and maybe also Satan.

Recommendations

11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Article good read with lots of facts. Harry Litman an American lawyer, law professor, former dep. ast. AG. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 16 #1
Pretending Garland is the real victim in all of this might be a good PR strategy. Irish_Dem Jan 16 #2
+1. No one wondered why Trump hardly ever insulted or attacked Garland dalton99a Jan 17 #45
Anyone still defending this poor bastard should compare how long he took to appoint a Special Counsel for Trump vs Biden W_HAMILTON Jan 16 #3
It took WAAAAYYYYY too long!! InAbLuEsTaTe Wednesday #51
Makes ya wonder how South Korea was able to do it so quickly. Think. Again. Jan 16 #4
The SKorean prez was much more overt with a very publicly directed coup attempt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 16 #16
Ya really can't get any more overt or public than Jan. 6 Think. Again. Jan 16 #18
You really can. Yoon did. He put official machinery in motion. tRump did not, pretended to be uninvolved Bernardo de La Paz Jan 16 #21
Both publicly attempted a violent coup... Think. Again. Jan 16 #22
Makes me envy Peru Ponietz Jan 16 #30
Looking forward to hearing from Joe in his memoir thebigidea Jan 16 #5
We fought the Civil War like a Sunday softball game Ponietz Jan 16 #32
opposing this pov should require presenting something of substance to dispute it bigtree Jan 16 #6
You do realize Smith didn't mention the first 2 years, right? Think. Again. Jan 16 #19
Not buying it. lees1975 Jan 16 #7
must not have read the report. bigtree Jan 16 #8
I get that Smith is being a Garland apologist. But, if he'd been assigned to work on this a year earlier lees1975 Jan 16 #24
Garland himself on first taking office should've taken charge of investigating... brush Wednesday #53
Harry Litman is a moron and Merrick Garland is an agent of Satan. Ocelot II Jan 16 #9
I understand completely. Few will, though. MineralMan Jan 16 #11
Have you ever followed the timeline gab13by13 Jan 16 #17
Are you the person to whom I replied? I don't think so. MineralMan Jan 16 #20
Who do they think they are?!?! Think. Again. Jan 16 #23
I want to be sure that anything I posted about Garland was factual gab13by13 Jan 16 #25
A masterful analysis with bonus points for sarcasm LauraInLA Jan 16 #12
No he's not edhopper Jan 16 #10
I note those were all written befor the report's release, some long before. LauraInLA Jan 16 #31
LOL ffs awesomerwb1 Jan 16 #13
I continue to believe Garland gave us a bum rap. Sneederbunk Jan 16 #14
Thanks for the laugh gab13by13 Jan 16 #15
The fact that you don't see even ONE of Biden's people praise or defend Garland says it all thebigidea Jan 16 #26
President Biden's White House counsel gab13by13 Jan 16 #33
He's a mixed bag. GoCubsGo Jan 16 #27
It was obvious that no conviction was going to happen before 2025 dsc Jan 16 #28
When was it obvious? gab13by13 Jan 16 #34
In July of 2024 dsc Jan 16 #36
I think they were waiting on the election. Once Trump won, things were pretty much dropped. LeftInTX Jan 16 #37
It was nothing short of delusional to think this SCOTUS was going to permit Trump to be convicted in any trial dsc Jan 16 #42
Yeah no qazplm135 Jan 16 #29
If Trump indicted in 2021. Gets put on hold due to immunity question. Immunity question settled in July 2022 LeftInTX Jan 16 #38
Or the immunity question qazplm135 Jan 16 #39
That would not have happened. They were delaying on purpose. LeftInTX Jan 16 #40
No it gets raised earlier qazplm135 Jan 16 #43
They waited a year. LeftInTX Jan 17 #44
Well given we could have started qazplm135 Jan 17 #47
Bum rap? He's not the victim. The American people are Autumn Jan 16 #35
Bum rap one says republianmushroom Jan 16 #41
Nope. Garland sucks. ZonkerHarris Jan 17 #46
gaslighting fail Skittles Jan 17 #48
If Garland wants to blunt the criticism,... LudwigPastorius Jan 17 #49
Thank you for posting this. I read something similar some time back. CBHagman Wednesday #50
Bum rap nothing. Garland failed miseably. He should've investigated, prosecuted, tried... brush Wednesday #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Merrick Garland is Gettin...»Reply #9