Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

W_HAMILTON

(8,602 posts)
3. Anyone still defending this poor bastard should compare how long he took to appoint a Special Counsel for Trump vs Biden
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:22 PM
Yesterday

I already wasn't a fan of the guy, but when someone posted that timeline the other day, it really hit home what a pathetic failure Garland has been.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Article good read with lots of facts. Harry Litman an American lawyer, law professor, former dep. ast. AG. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #1
Pretending Garland is the real victim in all of this might be a good PR strategy. Irish_Dem Yesterday #2
+1. No one wondered why Trump hardly ever insulted or attacked Garland dalton99a 14 hrs ago #45
Anyone still defending this poor bastard should compare how long he took to appoint a Special Counsel for Trump vs Biden W_HAMILTON Yesterday #3
Makes ya wonder how South Korea was able to do it so quickly. Think. Again. Yesterday #4
The SKorean prez was much more overt with a very publicly directed coup attempt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #16
Ya really can't get any more overt or public than Jan. 6 Think. Again. Yesterday #18
You really can. Yoon did. He put official machinery in motion. tRump did not, pretended to be uninvolved Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #21
Both publicly attempted a violent coup... Think. Again. Yesterday #22
Makes me envy Peru Ponietz Yesterday #30
Looking forward to hearing from Joe in his memoir thebigidea Yesterday #5
We fought the Civil War like a Sunday softball game Ponietz Yesterday #32
opposing this pov should require presenting something of substance to dispute it bigtree Yesterday #6
You do realize Smith didn't mention the first 2 years, right? Think. Again. Yesterday #19
Not buying it. lees1975 Yesterday #7
must not have read the report. bigtree Yesterday #8
I get that Smith is being a Garland apologist. But, if he'd been assigned to work on this a year earlier lees1975 Yesterday #24
Harry Litman is a moron and Merrick Garland is an agent of Satan. Ocelot II Yesterday #9
I understand completely. Few will, though. MineralMan Yesterday #11
Have you ever followed the timeline gab13by13 Yesterday #17
Are you the person to whom I replied? I don't think so. MineralMan Yesterday #20
Who do they think they are?!?! Think. Again. Yesterday #23
I want to be sure that anything I posted about Garland was factual gab13by13 Yesterday #25
A masterful analysis with bonus points for sarcasm LauraInLA Yesterday #12
No he's not edhopper Yesterday #10
I note those were all written befor the report's release, some long before. LauraInLA Yesterday #31
LOL ffs awesomerwb1 Yesterday #13
I continue to believe Garland gave us a bum rap. Sneederbunk Yesterday #14
Thanks for the laugh gab13by13 Yesterday #15
The fact that you don't see even ONE of Biden's people praise or defend Garland says it all thebigidea Yesterday #26
President Biden's White House counsel gab13by13 Yesterday #33
He's a mixed bag. GoCubsGo Yesterday #27
It was obvious that no conviction was going to happen before 2025 dsc Yesterday #28
When was it obvious? gab13by13 Yesterday #34
In July of 2024 dsc Yesterday #36
I think they were waiting on the election. Once Trump won, things were pretty much dropped. LeftInTX 23 hrs ago #37
It was nothing short of delusional to think this SCOTUS was going to permit Trump to be convicted in any trial dsc 22 hrs ago #42
Yeah no qazplm135 Yesterday #29
If Trump indicted in 2021. Gets put on hold due to immunity question. Immunity question settled in July 2022 LeftInTX 23 hrs ago #38
Or the immunity question qazplm135 23 hrs ago #39
That would not have happened. They were delaying on purpose. LeftInTX 22 hrs ago #40
No it gets raised earlier qazplm135 15 hrs ago #43
They waited a year. LeftInTX 14 hrs ago #44
Well given we could have started qazplm135 14 hrs ago #47
Bum rap? He's not the victim. The American people are Autumn Yesterday #35
Bum rap one says republianmushroom 22 hrs ago #41
Nope. Garland sucks. ZonkerHarris 14 hrs ago #46
gaslighting fail Skittles 10 hrs ago #48
If Garland wants to blunt the criticism,... LudwigPastorius 10 hrs ago #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Merrick Garland is Gettin...»Reply #3