Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

valleyrogue

(1,521 posts)
2. Age limitations are not an "infringement on free speech."
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:52 PM
Jan 15

I can't believe anybody making excuses for minors to access truly vile content which exploits women and girls. Urinating and defecating on women, beating and strangling women, calling them all kinds of vile names, alleged incest porn, you name it. No wonder women are turning away from men en masse. For many women, it isn't worth risking their lives to date or partner with men who consume porn and want to reenact what they see.

The porn lobby is powerful and has conned people over the decades, including dimwitted, misogynistic judges, that the human rights violations of women and girls is simply harmless "fun." It isn't. Men don't have a right to use women, whether directly or by proxy in the case of porn. Women and girls are not things to buy and sell.

Again, this is not a hill the political left should die on. The excuses for it continuing to exist ring hollow. Let the porn industry die on the vine. Good riddance.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court seems open ...»Reply #2