Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who are vehemently criticising Merrick Garland [View all]Beastly Boy
(11,509 posts)44. At times due process requires more than four years. There is no time frame on due process.
I am not an attorney, and neither are you. And you have never prosecuted a case. How does this affect due process?
LOL indeed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Personally, I think Garland and Biden -- who could have told MG to up his game -- knew this would be a chitshow.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#1
Maybe. Again, Biden could have picked up phone or fired him. We spent too much time thinking we
Silent Type
Wednesday
#5
He could have run! The law only allowed congress to prevent him from being seated.
LeftInTX
Wednesday
#9
Indictments sure didn't matter. Disgusting as it is, running from behind plexiglass might have helped him more.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#13
He would have been out on appeal. It usually takes a year after a search warrant to bring a federal indictment.
LeftInTX
Wednesday
#16
Just the opposite. Jack Smith's report was as much a wimp out as Mueller's.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#38
This is what I mean. Of course the law had much to do with how quickly the prosecution occurred!
Beastly Boy
Wednesday
#33
At times due process requires more than four years. There is no time frame on due process.
Beastly Boy
Wednesday
#44
Speedy trial is the right of the defendant, not an imposition on the prosecution. Curious how a seasoned prosecutor
Beastly Boy
Yesterday
#48
Most people have no clue he's Jewish. To think that is the reason he is criticized on DU is ludicrous and unthinking
NoRethugFriends
Wednesday
#14
Garland could have appointed a Special Counsel to investigate Trump immediately upon his confirmation...
LudwigPastorius
Wednesday
#11
We all saw the insurrection happen in real time, and so did Garland. He should have opened the investigation
pnwmom
Wednesday
#30
Garland should have gone after trump as soon as he started going after trumps idiots.
Autumn
Wednesday
#35