General Discussion

Autumn

(48,698 posts)

35. Garland should have gone after trump as soon as he started going after trumps idiots.

Wed Jan 15, 2025, 10:21 AM

Jan 2025

He waited 11 months after he knew about the stolen documents and waited 22 months after Biden was inaugurated to appoint Jack Smith.

Two days before Trump left office the classified documents were removed from the White House, photographs show the boxes leaving the WH office carried by his staff . May 6, 2021 was when the NA realized some documents from Trump’s presidency may be missing, the National Archives asks that he turn over any presidential records he may have kept upon leaving the White House.

As we know, he didn't. Garland knew he didn't turn them over. In July 2021 Trump was publicly showing off classified documents at his club to his friends.

Garland appointed jack Smith November 18, 2022.

Garland went after the small fry immediately after J5 .

We watched trump and some of his congressional thugs commit their crimes in real time on Jan6 2021 and watched their cover up begin from the very next day.

Garland ran out the clock to protect Trump. Fuck Merrick Garland.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Clouds Passing miyazaki Bettie

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Those who are vehemently criticising Merrick Garland [View all] canetoad Jan 2025 OP

Personally, I think Garland and Biden -- who could have told MG to up his game -- knew this would be a chitshow. Silent Type Jan 2025 #1

Trump would not have been able to run iemanja Jan 2025 #4

Maybe. Again, Biden could have picked up phone or fired him. We spent too much time thinking we Silent Type Jan 2025 #5

I'm not thinking anything other than what Smith just reported. iemanja Jan 2025 #6

He could have run! The law only allowed congress to prevent him from being seated. LeftInTX Jan 2025 #9

Let's put it this way iemanja Jan 2025 #10

Indictments sure didn't matter. Disgusting as it is, running from behind plexiglass might have helped him more. Silent Type Jan 2025 #13

I seriously doubt it iemanja Jan 2025 #19

I mean qazplm135 Jan 2025 #22

He wasn't president during the last four years iemanja Jan 2025 #25

Literally day one qazplm135 Jan 2025 #31

He would have been out on appeal. It usually takes a year after a search warrant to bring a federal indictment. LeftInTX Jan 2025 #16

You seem highly invested in coming up with scenarios iemanja Jan 2025 #17

Post removed Post removed Jan 2025 #23

Jack Smith is iemanja Jan 2025 #26

He's a prosecutor. He can't put Trump in prison!!! LeftInTX Jan 2025 #27

Just the opposite. Jack Smith's report was as much a wimp out as Mueller's. Silent Type Jan 2025 #38

That's not true qazplm135 Jan 2025 #20

Please read my responses below iemanja Jan 2025 #21

The post I replied to qazplm135 Jan 2025 #24

Not sit on my hands for two years iemanja Jan 2025 #2

How about simply faster and with less timidity? Frasier Balzov Jan 2025 #3

Well, at least nobody is posting their own version of the law. Beastly Boy Jan 2025 #7

I mean "the law" didn't have much to do qazplm135 Jan 2025 #18

This is what I mean. Of course the law had much to do with how quickly the prosecution occurred! Beastly Boy Jan 2025 #33

Lol qazplm135 Jan 2025 #41

At times due process requires more than four years. There is no time frame on due process. Beastly Boy Jan 2025 #44

There literally is a time frame for due process qazplm135 Jan 2025 #45

Ok, I will give you an opportunity to show off your legal background. Beastly Boy Jan 2025 #46

Both states and the feds have speedy trial qazplm135 Jan 2025 #47

Speedy trial is the right of the defendant, not an imposition on the prosecution. Curious how a seasoned prosecutor Beastly Boy Jan 2025 #48

Lol qazplm135 Jan 2025 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author LeftInTX Jan 2025 #8

Most people have no clue he's Jewish. To think that is the reason he is criticized on DU is ludicrous and unthinking NoRethugFriends Jan 2025 #14

That's a lot of hyperbole qazplm135 Jan 2025 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author arthritisR_US Jan 2025 #28

Garland could have appointed a Special Counsel to investigate Trump immediately upon his confirmation... LudwigPastorius Jan 2025 #11

It's not hard qazplm135 Jan 2025 #12

He could have released the full Mueller report. intheflow Jan 2025 #34

Garland is the worst of the worst of AGs awesomerwb1 Jan 2025 #29

We all saw the insurrection happen in real time, and so did Garland. He should have opened the investigation pnwmom Jan 2025 #30

It' not just Garland, it's the whole system. Scruffy1 Jan 2025 #32

If the sc gave him his way out that's on them. The stalling is on Garland. Autumn Jan 2025 #36

Garland should have gone after trump as soon as he started going after trumps idiots. Autumn Jan 2025 #35

Thank you. William769 Jan 2025 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Clouds Passing Jan 2025 #39

Did you tell duers to have patience four years ago? Emile Jan 2025 #40

As soon as the first insurrectionist interviewed opened his or her mouth and said they went to the Capitol because Trump Jit423 Jan 2025 #42

Has you question been answered? edhopper Jan 2025 #43

Simply this : Justice delayed is Justice denied". OnDoutside Jan 2025 #50

1 - Assign someone to investigate tsf on 1/7 and don't give it to some right wing toady! lark Jan 2025 #51