Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who are vehemently criticising Merrick Garland [View all]awesomerwb1
(4,647 posts)29. Garland is the worst of the worst of AGs
And yes, because of his incompetence and cowardice is why we are where we are today.
Everybody in the whole damn world (normal not MAGA world) knew cheeto committed crime after crime. But hey, let's wait 2 years to get the ball rolling. And do it very slowly as well please.
I can't believe Garland at one point could've been a SC justice. I can really imagine the dude siding with the conservatives 60-70 percent of the time. He's that incompetent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Personally, I think Garland and Biden -- who could have told MG to up his game -- knew this would be a chitshow.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#1
Maybe. Again, Biden could have picked up phone or fired him. We spent too much time thinking we
Silent Type
Wednesday
#5
He could have run! The law only allowed congress to prevent him from being seated.
LeftInTX
Wednesday
#9
Indictments sure didn't matter. Disgusting as it is, running from behind plexiglass might have helped him more.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#13
He would have been out on appeal. It usually takes a year after a search warrant to bring a federal indictment.
LeftInTX
Wednesday
#16
Just the opposite. Jack Smith's report was as much a wimp out as Mueller's.
Silent Type
Wednesday
#38
This is what I mean. Of course the law had much to do with how quickly the prosecution occurred!
Beastly Boy
Wednesday
#33
At times due process requires more than four years. There is no time frame on due process.
Beastly Boy
Wednesday
#44
Speedy trial is the right of the defendant, not an imposition on the prosecution. Curious how a seasoned prosecutor
Beastly Boy
Yesterday
#48
Most people have no clue he's Jewish. To think that is the reason he is criticized on DU is ludicrous and unthinking
NoRethugFriends
Wednesday
#14
Garland could have appointed a Special Counsel to investigate Trump immediately upon his confirmation...
LudwigPastorius
Wednesday
#11
We all saw the insurrection happen in real time, and so did Garland. He should have opened the investigation
pnwmom
Wednesday
#30
Garland should have gone after trump as soon as he started going after trumps idiots.
Autumn
Wednesday
#35