Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(1,009 posts)
92. "Should have been enough time"
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 01:42 AM
Jan 2025

He didn't get around to indicting Trump until August 2023. That was just 15 months before the election.

Smith was named as SC in Nov 2022. At first, one might say that 9 months to bring an indictment isn't exactly slow. Maybe, except for the fact that the House special committee had already compiled a vast cache of evidence, and DoJ was also supposedly doing its own investigation for the two years prior. So by the time Smith came on board, there was already a mountain of evidence.

Of course, some of the Congressional evidence wasn't admissible in court, so Smith's team would need to do some backtracking to get essential evidence into indictable form. But that wasn't the main delay. The big delays came because Smith acted as if time wasn't important, and he kept expanding his probe month after month, instead of getting some basic crimes into trial quickly. And by letting the scope run wild, he exposed himself to the 11th Circuit, and all the shenanigans that Cannon pulled. That slowed everything down.

Bottom line, never any sense of urgency in any of this from either Garland or Smith. Garland was happy rolling up the dumbasses that took dumps in the Capitol, and never had any intention to do anything more.

So yes, I blame Smith AND Garland, and find it discouraging that anybody would still be defending that pair at this stage. Garland stalled for 2 years. Smith didn't necessarily stall, but he went on a wild goose chase that guaranteed there would never be a trial before the election. They both are to blame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What a fucking disgrace. Autumn Jan 2025 #1
He managed to convict Hunter of what most of the Maga gun owners do, Bluethroughu Jan 2025 #88
Textbook example of "Justice delayed is justice denied" (Gladstone). sop Jan 2025 #2
I was thinking... 2naSalit Jan 2025 #3
He really should have known better Bluetus Jan 2025 #35
What are you talking about? dpibel Jan 2025 #41
What I'm saying is that he spread himself so thin with such a grandiose bag of charges Bluetus Jan 2025 #57
Why Are You Blaming Smith For The Problems Caused By Roberts? DallasNE Jan 2025 #89
"Should have been enough time" Bluetus Jan 2025 #92
Silly. H2O Man Jan 2025 #90
Two more words edhopper Jan 2025 #4
The entire effin system failed malaise Jan 2025 #5
Aint that the truth! edhopper Jan 2025 #10
+1 Dave Bowman Jan 2025 #51
He should have been cuffed and taken away on 1/6/21. Haggard Celine Jan 2025 #81
That simplr malaise Jan 2025 #83
And now I predict he's going to "run for his life" and "hide" somewhere. Justice matters. Jan 2025 #8
Depends VBNMW Jan 2025 #68
My 2 words: Garland won. MLAA Jan 2025 #6
Thank you. William769 Jan 2025 #7
I don't think he means edhopper Jan 2025 #11
I meant my post to suggest that in retrospect I think Garland intentionally slow rolled the federal cases against TFG MLAA Jan 2025 #15
Yes edhopper Jan 2025 #21
Thanks for your clarification, the only other explanation for Garland's supreme failure is that he is not very bright MLAA Jan 2025 #30
OR VBNMW Jan 2025 #67
It's possible, but I lean more toward Biden choosing not to fire Garland due to the optics of firing the AG who brought MLAA Jan 2025 #74
The problems with GOP, the courts and political crimes are deeper PufPuf23 Jan 2025 #91
Indeed MLAA Jan 2025 #95
I have asked homegirl Jan 2025 #38
Enquiring minds (like ours) want to know! MLAA Jan 2025 #42
I think they brought their own hookers. Maru Kitteh Jan 2025 #59
O. M. G. calimary Jan 2025 #78
The people funding that were Republicans, if not purebred Nazis Bluetus Jan 2025 #60
The ONLY thing I have seen is that Drumpf allowed them to stay free at his hotel. Zero beyond that. Nice job DOJ.... Evolve Dammit Jan 2025 #79
That may very well be. William769 Jan 2025 #19
You mean that Garland isn't an abject failure edhopper Jan 2025 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author MLAA Jan 2025 #25
To me Garlands detractors are abject failure William769 Jan 2025 #31
Biden says edhopper Jan 2025 #34
... orangecrush Jan 2025 #76
I was a vocal supporter of Garland's until the last 6 months or so. MLAA Jan 2025 #12
Thank you for the clarification. William769 Jan 2025 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author AKwannabe Jan 2025 #43
How about DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #80
Yep. Two months before the election instead of two months after would have been nice. still-prayin4rain Jan 2025 #9
Too Late dalton99a Jan 2025 #13
I think the 2nd report will be more damaging Johonny Jan 2025 #14
Totally agree! dmr Jan 2025 #17
The second investigation focused on the possession of highly classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. sop Jan 2025 #32
This is the one I. want people to see MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #39
I'm afraid my opinion of the GOP is low enough that I'll need to see them not ignoring it... JHB Jan 2025 #45
You're right, they'll all die on that hill defending Trump. sop Jan 2025 #50
"It will be difficult for Republicans to ignore & defend..." Nah, they'll make it look easy. n/t Beartracks Jan 2025 #65
When the 2nd report shows Trump shared top secret documents with the shady foreign nationals who hang sop Jan 2025 #66
It will be totally easy J-9 Jan 2025 #82
"Blah blah witchhunt blah blah weaponized justice system blah blah..." The usual shit schtick. Beartracks Jan 2025 #84
Is a second report confirmed? msfiddlestix Jan 2025 #48
Biden could release it this afternoon. Bluetus Jan 2025 #61
The 2nd report will not be released officially. totodeinhere Jan 2025 #69
Think about this gab13by13 Jan 2025 #16
I didn't know that. dmr Jan 2025 #24
From Politico, 2017: JHB Jan 2025 #54
Thank you. Like you, I figured Biden chose Garland dmr Jan 2025 #64
really? I missed that factoid. Regardless, I knew Garland was the wrong pick during his pathetic confirmation hearing msfiddlestix Jan 2025 #49
Something is inherently wrong with a legal system that can't prosecute cases in four years. lees1975 Jan 2025 #20
I am sorry, but have to agree on this one. True Blue American Jan 2025 #29
LOL VBNMW Jan 2025 #71
another 2 words bdamomma Jan 2025 #23
Or 3 words woodsprite Jan 2025 #26
Which is precisely why Trump sought, and the courts provided, delay after delay Fiendish Thingy Jan 2025 #27
"Garland Delayed". Think. Again. Jan 2025 #28
Merrick Garland, a name that will live in infamy. Borogove Jan 2025 #33
**NEVER** Trust a Republican... NEVER uponit7771 Jan 2025 #36
A truth beyond has never been truer. Butterflylady Jan 2025 #44
We were promised.. VBNMW Jan 2025 #72
I don't see orangecrush Jan 2025 #77
Any chance whatsoever Democrats learned a lesson from all this?? I am not holding my breath. NoMoreRepugs Jan 2025 #37
Absolutely VBNMW Jan 2025 #73
"Treason coverup". They did not release the half about documents case. lostnfound Jan 2025 #40
TRAITOR WALKS Kid Berwyn Jan 2025 #46
I guess FOUR YEARS wasn't long enough . . . Emile Jan 2025 #47
Three: He did it! NM Grins Jan 2025 #52
Yup, time did matter. republianmushroom Jan 2025 #53
Yep, Too Late IbogaProject Jan 2025 #55
I don't think this report would have impacted the election HereForTheParty Jan 2025 #56
Absolutely the case. Nothing new here. Bluetus Jan 2025 #62
It -might- have gotten more Dems & Independents to vote for Kamala. electric_blue68 Jan 2025 #85
This again. nt Drum Jan 2025 #58
Hope springs eternal stillcool Jan 2025 #63
Wow, now folks are bashing Jack Smith? You are kidding, right? This is a GOP dream... Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #70
Thom Hartmann made a point in the third hour of today's program Mike 03 Jan 2025 #75
At least Garland avoided the appearance of a political agenda Orrex Jan 2025 #86
I remember a time when the US media were full of . . . Aussie105 Jan 2025 #87
"Too big to jail" n/t King_Klonopin Jan 2025 #93
I never put a hero label on people anymore. But I surprised at the hate for Smith here: Cannon was the problem. C Moon Jan 2025 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack Smith's Report Can B...»Reply #92