The prosecutor wasn’t able to make his case in court, but months later, he’s bringing his arguments to the public in forceful and unrestrained ways.
Jack Smith wasn’t able to make his case in court, but with increasing frequency, he’s bringing his arguments to the public in forceful ways.
Given what he has to say, that’s very good news.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-07T17:34:30.621Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/silent-no-more-jack-smith-calls-out-trumps-corrupted-justice-department
Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory marked the beginning of the end of then-special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal cases. Almost immediately after Election Day, the prosecutor and his team grudgingly wrapped up their work —
not because they wanted to or because they lacked compelling evidence, but because of Justice Department guidelines related to prosecuting a sitting president.....
But nearly a year and a half later,
the former special counsel has made the transition from a lawyer who preferred silence to one who has quite a bit to say. The New York Times reported:
Jack Smith, the special counsel who twice indicted President Trump, accused the Justice Department of having been “corrupted” by Trump loyalists he claimed were demolishing its credibility and seeking to undermine the rule of law.
Mr. Smith’s remarks, made last month in a private discussion at the Cosmos Club in Washington, represented his sharpest criticism of the department since leaving his post early last year.
“We have a Department of Justice today that targets people for criminal prosecution simply because the president doesn’t like them,” Smith said in the hourlong discussion on April 20, according to a video obtained by the Times that was shared with attendees. He added,
“We have a department that fails to move on cases because they might uncover facts that are inconvenient to narratives the president would like to press.”.....
Soon after, during an interview with former prosecutor Andrew Weissmann at the University College London,
Smith condemned Republican criticisms of his work as “ludicrous,” adding, “I think the attacks on public servants, particularly nonpartisan public servants — I think it has a cost for our country that is incalculable, and I think that we — it’s hard to communicate to folks how much that is going to cost us.”
More recently,
Smith also delivered private and public testimony before the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee, which also didn’t do his Republican detractors any favors.
Smith was not able to make his case in court, but with increasing frequency, he’s bringing his arguments to the public in forceful and unrestrained ways.
= new reply since forum marked as read
