History of Feminism
Related: About this forumDo you have a good reason for locking my thread?
I was polite, I deleted a certain word per request of group member, I was on topic.
I somehow don't have enough posts to ask you in PM, boston bean, so asking you here.
![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
mercuryblues
(15,389 posts)clue why the host did.
Let me explain something. This is a protected group for feminists. Which means you can not post anything you want.
here is the SOP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12553074
I had asked and explained why the word you used should be changed. There was ample enough time to do so. When I saw that you refused to do so, I alerted.
Regrell
(30 posts)Even though it was NOT used in a context to slander women. It was meant to underscore the shared experiences of people who trade on their physical and mental health to pay the bills.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Regrell
(30 posts)Obviously I wouldn't have posted it if I didn't have a "good reason" (to find some common ground in feminism with men who are victims of trading their bodies for a wage).
mimi85
(1,805 posts)what was the word? Can you PM me or is "the word" in the SOP. I can see I'd like this group - I've been through this rodeo many times.
Regrell
(30 posts)I applied it both to women who have no better options to selling their bodies sexually, to men in physical jobs that grind their joints down, to anyone who has worked a double shift in a factory or restaurant on their feet...etc...
BainsBane
(55,406 posts)I for one thought you suggested some interesting ideas about gender and class that could make for good discussion. I can see how the host might have had concerns about the way you expressed them though.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Regrell
(30 posts)Not sure how many you need for PMs?
BainsBane
(55,406 posts)I forgot about that.