Anthropology
Related: About this forumDNA Reveals the People Who Replaced Stonehenge's Builders Along With 90% of Britain's Population Came from a Dutch Swamp
Ancient DNA reveals how a resilient group of hunter-gatherers transformed Britains history.
by Tibi Puiu
February 12, 2026
Edited and reviewed by Zoe Gordon

Illustration representing the cultural transition at stonehenge from neolithic builders to the Bell Beaker population
Credit: ZME Science.
Archaeologists have dismissed the sodden, peat-filled deltas of the Lower Rhine and Meuse rivers as a historical backwater. Thats todays Netherlands. No offence to the Dutch, but during the Bronze Age, not a lot seemed to be happening over there. Or so we thought, now that a new genetic study has revealed that this overlooked water world actually sheltered a unique population that would eventually launch one of the most dramatic takeovers in human history.
The Netherlands seemed like the most boring place in the world, admits David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard University, in an interview with New Scientist. But it turned out to be perhaps the most interesting place in Europe.
Reichs team sequenced the DNA of 112 ancient individuals and discovered that while the rest of Europe was being swept by waves of Neolithic farmers, a stubborn group of hunter-gatherers in these wetlands held their ground. They maintained their distinct genetic ancestry and their way of life for a staggering 3,000 years longer than their neighbors.
Thats not all, though. This resilient group eventually fused with steppe migrants to form the Bell Beaker culture, crossing the North Sea into Britain around 2400 BC to almost entirely replace the people who built Stonehenge. It turns out the ancestors of modern Britain didnt come from the grand civilizations of the south, but from the resourceful foragers of the Dutch swamps.
More:
https://www.zmescience.com/medicine/genetic/bell-beaker-britain-replacement/
bucolic_frolic
(54,570 posts)I thought the Celts were the ultimate (oldest) source that invaded Britain. Now they've got some in the Dutch swamps, and 2000 years older by any measure. The Vikings were 1500 years after the Celts. Wave after wave of conquerors. What'd they put in the water over there?
erronis
(23,241 posts)Not exactly out of central Europe.
An amazing new perspective. I'm sure it'll be argued for another few centuries/eons.
Bohunk68
(1,452 posts)soon find, if they have English background, that there is a lot of German and Dutch in some areas along the North Sea and Channel. I have a bunch of both, and no recent ancestors from the area. Mine are from the early 1600's migrations to America. 75% of my background, with the other 25% being from the mountains of Central Italy during the late 1880's. When I do presentations, I tell my audience right off, that those nice genealogies do not account for when Grandma had a little fling with the next door neighbor. Get your dna checked.
