Science
Related: About this forumResearchers identify new superconductors, unlocking process that could yield thousands more
https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/researchers-identify-new-superconductors-unlocking-process-that-could-yield-thousands-morePhysicists have used machine-learning to discover two new superconductorsit represents a substantial step towards realising massive energy efficiency gains from superconductivity.
An international team of quantum researchers has shown how machine learning can be used to filter a practically infinite number of possible material combinations to identify candidates for superconductivity. Thanks to the breakthrough, new superconductors can now be found much faster, says Aalto University Professor Päivi Törmä, who leads the SuperC consortium behind the research.
Over the decades researchers have recognised over 7,000 superconductors, but mostly serendipitously, explains Törmä. The process of identifying possible materials is so computationally heavy that, in fact, researchers have only been able to theoretically predict the viability of about 20 of these.
Even if you manage to find what might look like a viable combination, most are completely unusable. For example, they are difficult to synthesize or scale, says Törmä. It follows that finding viable superconductors requires vast computational power to screen materials. SuperCs machine-learning approach upends that idea.
Our method uses machine-learning-based pre-screening followed by targeted calculations on the promising candidates. This approach will greatly speed up superconductor discovery in the future. With machine learning, we may be able to push the number of materials we can process into the billions, says Törmä. This will take us a critical step closer to finding a room-temperature superconductor.
erronis
(25,028 posts)I noticed that the excerpt did not use the slop term "AI" but much more accurately, "machine learning".
OKIsItJustMe
(22,443 posts)Having been introduced to Science Fiction at a young age, I knew what Artificial Intelligence was. When expert systems were heralded as Artificial Intelligence, my reaction was, Theyre not intelligent!
erronis
(25,028 posts)I was a software "engineer" (or was it "architect"?) during the 80s. We were all playing around with "neural networks" and fearful of the Japanese being so much more advanced with the fuzzy stuff.
Now, we're working on "quantum computers", and still nuclear fusion to power the planet.
Some things work out, most don't. And the ones that do are usually unlike how they were first envisaged.
OKIsItJustMe
(22,443 posts)Any more than a player piano is a musician.
rampartd
(5,549 posts)is the reason the data centers need so much cooling is that they need superconducting temps? go to space.
OKIsItJustMe
(22,443 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 30, 2026, 05:13 AM - Edit history (1)
https://orbital.inc/https://www.axiomspace.com/orbital-data-center
https://www.odchq.com/
https://orbitalaifactory.com/
https://www.starcloud.com/
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/03/nx-s1-5718416/ai-data-centers-in-space-spacex-elon-musk
APRIL 3, 20265:00 AM ET
HEARD ON MORNING EDITION
Standing before a friendly crowd in March, Elon Musk laid out his plan for the future of his companies, and it was literally out of this world.
Musk announced that his space-launch company, SpaceX, which had recently merged with his artificial intelligence company, xAI, would put data centers into orbit around the Earth.
It all comes down to electricity, he explained. "You're power constrained on Earth," he said. "Space has the advantage that it's always sunny."
Musk envisions legions of data-crunching satellites spinning around the planet, powering the AI revolution from above. It's the perfect pitch for taking SpaceX public. This week, Bloomberg reported that the company had filed documents confidentially to the Securities and Exchange Commission with the goal of listing an initial public offering this summer.
At least the AIs will be comfortable until reentry