Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumTwo CT men did 30 years for murder on the basis of a forensics expert's incorrect testimony
PrinceOfWhalesHat RetweetedTwo CT men did 30 years for murder on the basis of a forensics experts testimony that a towel of theirs had blood from the (horrifically bloody) crime scene. The towel hadnt been tested, and it wasnt even blood. Brutal rebuke from state Supreme Court. https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-new-milford-murder-supreme-court-reversal-20190614-shsnedup3bhldmn5hg3a35ettu-story.html
Link to tweet
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two CT men did 30 years for murder on the basis of a forensics expert's incorrect testimony (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2019
OP
Criminologist's testimony about a red-stained towel helped win murder convictions. It wasn't blood.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2019
#3
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)1. Didn't Lee also testify at OJ's trial?
I HAD faith in Lee before this article!
Hav
(5,969 posts)2. Horrible and frightening
On the other side, shouldn't it have been the job of the defense to test such a crucial piece of evidence with an own additional expert as well? Even if access to such an expert is probably a financial matter, surely the defense failed them as well.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,400 posts)3. Criminologist's testimony about a red-stained towel helped win murder convictions. It wasn't blood.
A criminologists testimony about a red-stained towel helped win murder convictions. But it wasnt blood.
Link to tweet