Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(31,144 posts)
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 06:07 AM Yesterday

What we don't know about mother's milk

Dr Katherine (Katie) Hinde is an Associate Professor of Evolutionary Biology and Senior Sustainability Scientist at Arizona State University, where she researches lactation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Hinde

https://www.ted.com/speakers/katie_hinde



What we don't know about mother's milk
1,607,577 plays
Katie Hinde TEDWomen 2016

More...
In 2008, a scientist stared at monkey milk and realized: we've been missing half the conversation. What she discovered changed everything we thought we knew about the world's first food.

She stood in a California primate research lab surrounded by hundreds of milk samples, running the same analysis for the hundredth time. She kept rechecking her data because what she was seeing seemed impossible.

Rhesus macaque mothers were producing completely different milk depending on whether they'd given birth to sons or daughters.

Sons received milk with higher concentrations of fat and protein—more energy per ounce, built for rapid growth. Daughters received larger volumes of milk with higher calcium levels—engineered for faster skeletal development. The biological recipe wasn't universal. It was customized.

Male scientists dismissed it. "Measurement error," they said. "Random variation."

But Katie Hinde trusted the math. And the math was screaming something revolutionary: milk wasn't just food. It was a message.

For decades, science had treated breast milk like fuel—a simple delivery system for calories, proteins, and fats. But if milk was just nutrition, why would it differ based on the baby's sex? Why would mothers unconsciously adjust the formula?

Hinde kept digging. She analyzed milk from over 250 rhesus macaque mothers across more than 700 sampling events. And with each discovery, the picture became clearer—and more astonishing.

Young, first-time monkey mothers produced milk with fewer calories but dramatically higher levels of cortisol (the stress hormone). Babies who consumed this high-cortisol milk grew faster but were more nervous, more vigilant, less confident. The milk wasn't just feeding the baby's body—it was programming the baby's temperament.

Then came the discovery that seemed almost impossible to believe.

When a baby gets sick, small amounts of the baby's saliva travel back through the nipple during nursing into the mother's breast tissue. That saliva contains information about the baby's immune status. If the baby is fighting an infection, the mother's body detects the antigens and begins producing specific antibodies—which then flow back to the baby through the milk within hours.

The white blood cell count in milk would jump from 2,000 cells per milliliter to over 5,000 during acute illness. Macrophage counts would quadruple. Then, once the baby recovered, everything would return to normal.

It was a dialogue. The baby's body communicated its needs. The mother's body responded.
Hinde had discovered a language that had been invisible to science.

Even more...
In 2011 Hinde began the popular science blog "Mammals Suck ... Milk!"

In 2011, she joined Harvard University as an assistant professor. But as she dug into the research literature, she found something disturbing: there were twice as many studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.

The world's first food—the substance that had nourished every human who ever lived—was scientifically neglected.

She started a blog with a deliberately provocative title: "Mammals Suck...Milk!" Within a year, it had over a million views. Parents, clinicians, and researchers began asking questions science hadn't bothered to answer.

Her research exploded with discoveries:

Milk changes across the day (fat concentration peaks mid-morning)

Foremilk differs from hindmilk (babies who nurse longer get higher-fat milk at the end)

More than 200 varieties of oligosaccharides exist in human milk—and babies can't even digest them. They exist solely to feed beneficial gut bacteria and prevent harmful pathogens from establishing.

Every mother's milk is as unique as a fingerprint—no two mothers produce identical milk, no two babies receive identical nutrition

In 2013, she created March Mammal Madness, a science outreach event that became an annual tradition in hundreds of classrooms. In 2016, she received the Ehrlich-Koldovsky Early Career Award for making outstanding contributions to lactation research.

By 2017, when she delivered her TED talk "What we don't know about mother's milk," she could articulate a decade of revolutionary findings: Breast milk is food, medicine, and signal—all at once. It builds the baby's body, fuels the baby's behavior, and carries a continuous conversation between two bodies that shapes human development one feeding at a time.

In 2020, she appeared in the Netflix docuseries Babies, explaining her discoveries to millions of viewers worldwide.

Today, at Arizona State University's Comparative Lactation Lab, Dr. Katie Hinde continues revealing new dimensions of how milk shapes infant outcomes from the first hours of life through childhood. Her work informs precision medicine for fragile infants in NICUs, improves formula development for mothers facing breastfeeding obstacles, and shapes public health policy worldwide.

The implications are profound. Milk has been evolving for 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs. What science dismissed as simple nutrition was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth.

Katie Hinde didn't just study milk. She revealed that the most ancient form of nourishment was also the most intelligent—a dynamic, responsive conversation that has been shaping human development since the beginning of our species.

And it all started because one scientist refused to accept that half the conversation was "measurement error."

❤️pants
🎄🎁🌞
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What we don't know about mother's milk (Original Post) littlemissmartypants Yesterday OP
Wow! UpInArms 23 hrs ago #1
And those are just the published studies for erection JT45242 23 hrs ago #2
damn! poozwah 23 hrs ago #5
That was interesting. mwmisses4289 23 hrs ago #3
That's nothing short of amazing, thank you Littlemissmartypants JMCKUSICK 23 hrs ago #4
Astounding, thank you. quaint 22 hrs ago #6
LMSP, thank you so much for posting Ilsa 22 hrs ago #7
Wow Joinfortmill 21 hrs ago #8
Brilliant! GiqueCee 21 hrs ago #9
Kudos to Dr. Hinde for refusing to be silenced by sexism dlk 21 hrs ago #10
Of Course... Multichromatic 17 hrs ago #11
KNR forr this most important topic. niyad 17 hrs ago #12
Vey interesting and... 2naSalit 17 hrs ago #13

JT45242

(3,789 posts)
2. And those are just the published studies for erection
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 07:09 AM
23 hrs ago

Had a friend in the pharmaceutical industry tell me more money was going into boner pill research than all other diseases combined at multiple pharmaceutical research companies. Because rich old dudes would pay big. Plus once they found a good drug they would get it easily onto formulary schedules with powerful men pushing it.

All that said, incredible research. Curious as to how that plays out in humans so I'll need to look up her research more in depth.

Ilsa

(63,721 posts)
7. LMSP, thank you so much for posting
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 08:19 AM
22 hrs ago

this article! I was a lactation specialist many years ago, and reading this both amazes and angers me. I'm always amazed by the new things discovered, but so angry about male scientists' dismissiveness of her work, and their selfish priorities.

"What science dismissed as simple nutrition was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth."

I wish I had studied evolutionary biology.

dlk

(13,082 posts)
10. Kudos to Dr. Hinde for refusing to be silenced by sexism
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 08:48 AM
21 hrs ago

One can only imagine the multitude of scientific discoveries never fully realized because of sexism.

Women’s biology matters.

Multichromatic

(26 posts)
11. Of Course...
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 12:39 PM
17 hrs ago

How sad and pathetic that male scientists would completely dismiss findings about breast milk made by a female scientist.

Why, those silly women folk don't know what they're talking about.

2naSalit

(99,423 posts)
13. Vey interesting and...
Thu Dec 11, 2025, 01:29 PM
17 hrs ago

Now revives my arguments about how so many American babies are not breast fed at all. All those non-breast fed babies are possibly those who suffer so many maladies that may have come from that one thing. And how does this discrepancy of mother's milk affect society in the ways in which those children develop and how they interact with those who have had the early advantages of mother's milk?

A lot of food for thought here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»What we don't know about ...