Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumWhat we don't know about mother's milk
Dr Katherine (Katie) Hinde is an Associate Professor of Evolutionary Biology and Senior Sustainability Scientist at Arizona State University, where she researches lactation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Hinde
https://www.ted.com/speakers/katie_hinde
What we don't know about mother's milk
1,607,577 plays
Katie Hinde TEDWomen 2016
More...
In 2008, a scientist stared at monkey milk and realized: we've been missing half the conversation. What she discovered changed everything we thought we knew about the world's first food.
She stood in a California primate research lab surrounded by hundreds of milk samples, running the same analysis for the hundredth time. She kept rechecking her data because what she was seeing seemed impossible.
Rhesus macaque mothers were producing completely different milk depending on whether they'd given birth to sons or daughters.
Sons received milk with higher concentrations of fat and proteinmore energy per ounce, built for rapid growth. Daughters received larger volumes of milk with higher calcium levelsengineered for faster skeletal development. The biological recipe wasn't universal. It was customized.
Male scientists dismissed it. "Measurement error," they said. "Random variation."
But Katie Hinde trusted the math. And the math was screaming something revolutionary: milk wasn't just food. It was a message.
For decades, science had treated breast milk like fuela simple delivery system for calories, proteins, and fats. But if milk was just nutrition, why would it differ based on the baby's sex? Why would mothers unconsciously adjust the formula?
Hinde kept digging. She analyzed milk from over 250 rhesus macaque mothers across more than 700 sampling events. And with each discovery, the picture became clearerand more astonishing.
Young, first-time monkey mothers produced milk with fewer calories but dramatically higher levels of cortisol (the stress hormone). Babies who consumed this high-cortisol milk grew faster but were more nervous, more vigilant, less confident. The milk wasn't just feeding the baby's bodyit was programming the baby's temperament.
Then came the discovery that seemed almost impossible to believe.
When a baby gets sick, small amounts of the baby's saliva travel back through the nipple during nursing into the mother's breast tissue. That saliva contains information about the baby's immune status. If the baby is fighting an infection, the mother's body detects the antigens and begins producing specific antibodieswhich then flow back to the baby through the milk within hours.
The white blood cell count in milk would jump from 2,000 cells per milliliter to over 5,000 during acute illness. Macrophage counts would quadruple. Then, once the baby recovered, everything would return to normal.
It was a dialogue. The baby's body communicated its needs. The mother's body responded.
Hinde had discovered a language that had been invisible to science.
Even more...
In 2011 Hinde began the popular science blog "Mammals Suck ... Milk!"
In 2011, she joined Harvard University as an assistant professor. But as she dug into the research literature, she found something disturbing: there were twice as many studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The world's first foodthe substance that had nourished every human who ever livedwas scientifically neglected.
She started a blog with a deliberately provocative title: "Mammals Suck...Milk!" Within a year, it had over a million views. Parents, clinicians, and researchers began asking questions science hadn't bothered to answer.
Her research exploded with discoveries:
Milk changes across the day (fat concentration peaks mid-morning)
Foremilk differs from hindmilk (babies who nurse longer get higher-fat milk at the end)
More than 200 varieties of oligosaccharides exist in human milkand babies can't even digest them. They exist solely to feed beneficial gut bacteria and prevent harmful pathogens from establishing.
Every mother's milk is as unique as a fingerprintno two mothers produce identical milk, no two babies receive identical nutrition
In 2013, she created March Mammal Madness, a science outreach event that became an annual tradition in hundreds of classrooms. In 2016, she received the Ehrlich-Koldovsky Early Career Award for making outstanding contributions to lactation research.
By 2017, when she delivered her TED talk "What we don't know about mother's milk," she could articulate a decade of revolutionary findings: Breast milk is food, medicine, and signalall at once. It builds the baby's body, fuels the baby's behavior, and carries a continuous conversation between two bodies that shapes human development one feeding at a time.
In 2020, she appeared in the Netflix docuseries Babies, explaining her discoveries to millions of viewers worldwide.
Today, at Arizona State University's Comparative Lactation Lab, Dr. Katie Hinde continues revealing new dimensions of how milk shapes infant outcomes from the first hours of life through childhood. Her work informs precision medicine for fragile infants in NICUs, improves formula development for mothers facing breastfeeding obstacles, and shapes public health policy worldwide.
The implications are profound. Milk has been evolving for 200 million yearslonger than dinosaurs. What science dismissed as simple nutrition was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth.
Katie Hinde didn't just study milk. She revealed that the most ancient form of nourishment was also the most intelligenta dynamic, responsive conversation that has been shaping human development since the beginning of our species.
And it all started because one scientist refused to accept that half the conversation was "measurement error."
❤️pants
🎄🎁🌞
UpInArms
(53,864 posts)Thank you for sharing
JT45242
(3,789 posts)Had a friend in the pharmaceutical industry tell me more money was going into boner pill research than all other diseases combined at multiple pharmaceutical research companies. Because rich old dudes would pay big. Plus once they found a good drug they would get it easily onto formulary schedules with powerful men pushing it.
All that said, incredible research. Curious as to how that plays out in humans so I'll need to look up her research more in depth.
HARD to believe, right?
this story was terrific and was greatly appreciated.
mwmisses4289
(2,976 posts)Thanks for sharing.
JMCKUSICK
(4,823 posts)quaint
(4,524 posts)Ilsa
(63,721 posts)this article! I was a lactation specialist many years ago, and reading this both amazes and angers me. I'm always amazed by the new things discovered, but so angry about male scientists' dismissiveness of her work, and their selfish priorities.
"What science dismissed as simple nutrition was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth."
I wish I had studied evolutionary biology.
Joinfortmill
(19,782 posts)GiqueCee
(3,199 posts)Learn something new every day!
dlk
(13,082 posts)One can only imagine the multitude of scientific discoveries never fully realized because of sexism.
Womens biology matters.
Multichromatic
(26 posts)How sad and pathetic that male scientists would completely dismiss findings about breast milk made by a female scientist.
Why, those silly women folk don't know what they're talking about.
niyad
(129,109 posts)2naSalit
(99,423 posts)Now revives my arguments about how so many American babies are not breast fed at all. All those non-breast fed babies are possibly those who suffer so many maladies that may have come from that one thing. And how does this discrepancy of mother's milk affect society in the ways in which those children develop and how they interact with those who have had the early advantages of mother's milk?
A lot of food for thought here.