Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(35,103 posts)
Wed Feb 5, 2025, 05:45 PM Wednesday

His Maggotcy King Musk Has Apparently Shut the Oldest Continuous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Site in the World.

The link, which I have accessed daily for many years is now dead. There is no information as to whether the lab itself has been shut and the scientists there have been fired.

Dead link:

Weekly average CO2 at Mauna Loa

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

EarnestPutz

(2,739 posts)
2. Thanks for posting. It's stuff like this that get missed in the veritable "firehose" of bad news lately. I wouldn't....
Wed Feb 5, 2025, 05:56 PM
Wednesday

....be surprised if the everyone was fired, the lab was shut and then it was burned to the ground.

hatrack

(61,690 posts)
5. The last time reporting from MLO went offline, it was because of lava . .
Wed Feb 5, 2025, 07:39 PM
Wednesday

This time, the obstacle's sulfuric stench is far more pronounced.

NNadir

(35,103 posts)
8. It seems to be back up, for how long it will be, is hard to tell. I've read that project 2025 calls for removing NOAA.
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 05:59 AM
Thursday

hatrack

(61,690 posts)
9. Carbon Dioxide wouldn't pledge personal loyalty to Shitstain, so the site's on thin ice . . .
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 07:50 AM
Thursday

A happy thought as we await the January totals . . . .

https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/monthly.html

NNadir

(35,103 posts)
10. The planet's on thin ice. Back in 2016, the data was shocking...
Thu Feb 6, 2025, 08:56 AM
Thursday

...until 2024 blew 2016 away.

Of course, in 2015, 1998 was shocking.

In 1997, 1988 was shocking, at least to anyone who was looking. (I wasn't, my attention was drawn to it by Al Gore.)

There's noise of course, things like Covid and economic down turns, but the trend is clearly quadratic (parabolic) when one smoothes the data. (I suspect it may even be cubic with, thankfully, a low coefficient for the first term.)

I still, perhaps naively, believe it is technically feasible to do something, but obviously not politically. It is startling for me as the end of my life approaches to see a dark age of ignorance transcendent rising.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»His Maggotcy King Musk Ha...