Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(35,006 posts)
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 10:53 AM Sunday

The Effect of Low Dose Radiation on Immune Function

The paper I'll discuss in this post comes from the last issue of 2024 of one of my favorite scientific journals Environmental Science and Technology.

The article, which is fairly technical, is this one: Environmental Low-Dose Radiation Activates Th1 Immunity through the Mitochondria-STING Pathway Xiuxiu Yao, Wendi Huo, Yuchen Wang, Dongfang Xia, Yan Chen, Yuhua Tang, Huayong Tang, Wenjiang Yang, Yu Liu, Jingquan Xue, Qing Yuan, Xueyun Gao, and Kai Cao Environmental Science & Technology 2024 58 (52), 22907-22918.

As I'm way behind on my reading, I won't spend much time with it; confessing as well to having only some exposure to the finer details of molecular biology oriented immunology, but enough to consider myself marginally familiar. (I'm a proteomics guy, but basically an analytical proteomics guy concerned with structural molecular biology.)

The article conflicts with the LNT (linear no threshold) hypothesis that drives the radiation exposure regulations, the LNT being, questioned by some in the health physics community, most vociferously (to my knowledge) by Edward Calabrese.

The Health Physics Society put together a series of video lectures by Dr. Calabrese on the subject of the LNT here:

.

Anyway, from the introduction to the paper:

Low-dose radiation (LDR) is usually defined as a low linear energy transfer of less than 0.2 Gy or high linear energy transfer of less than 0.05 Gy. (1,2) In recent years, environmental LDR, especially those with high-energy, including X-ray and γ radiation, has become more and more prevalent due to various factors, such as increased medical imaging and treatments, nuclear power generation, and nuclear waste leakage, as well as some naturally occurring radioactive materials like minerals in the ground. (3,4) High-dose radiation (HDR) like cancer radiotherapy generally requires more than 2 Gy per day, and the severe detrimental effects on the human body were extensively explored, including cell death and tissue damage. (5,6) However, the biological effects of LDR are still highly uncertain.

The immune system plays as one of the most important defense mechanisms against various environmental insultants, including radiation. (7,8) T lymphocytes are the major player in the adaptive immune system, which are divided into CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with their own subsets. Type 1 CD4+ helper T cells (Th1) and type 1 CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (Tc1) are the main immune responsers by producing cytokines that secrete inflammatory cytokines and cytolytic molecules to kill pathogen or malignant cells, while regulatory T cells (Treg) are the immunosuppressive subtype. (9,10) LDR has been shown to interact with the immune system, however, with contradictory findings. Although some studies have found that LDR may suppress the immune system, decrease the thymic function, increase the risk of certain diseases, (11−14) there are many more studies that have shown LDR may induce immune responses in disease models. (15−17) However, the effect of LDR on healthy individuals is still highly obscure, as well as detailed cell subtype of its action, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. To illustrate the unambiguous immunoregulatory effect of environmental LDR, which may also promote both clinical and nonclinical application of LDR, it is critical to obtain the detailed information regarding to the effect of LDR on different immune cell subsets.

Here, we first irradiated splenocytes, the immune cells from largest lymphatic organ, with LDR, and found that the percentage of Th1 cells was specifically upregulated. Mechanistically, we found that LDR induced mitochondrial damage and resulted in the activation of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway that elevated the expression of T-bet, the master transcriptional factor of Th1-cell differentiation. We also irradiated mice with whole body LDR and found a similar phenomenon. The percentage of differentiated Th1 cells were elevated after LDR. Furthermore, preventive LDR significantly suppressed tumor growth, with increased systemic and intratumoral antitumor immunity, further confirming the immunoregulatory role of LDR. Therefore, our study elaborated in detail on the facilitating effect of low-dose environmental radiation on the human immune system and its underlying mechanism and thus provides novel information for the handling and potential future application of LDR...


The authors work was with mice, and takes place some 80 years after the work which Dr. Calabrese so strongly criticizes, on which the LNT, and thus our regulatory environment, is based. (Dr. Calabrese contends that the original LNT work was a case of scientific fraud.)

Some graphics from the paper:



The caption:

Figure 1. Effects of LDR on T cells in vitro. (a) Schematic for the treatment of splenocytes by LDR with or without activation by PMA + ionomycin and the following analysis for flow cytometry. (b,c) Naïve splenocytes were subjected to the indicated doses of LDR, and the percentage of CD4+ and Th1 cells is shown. (d,e) LDR-treated splenocytes were stimulated by PMA and ionomycin for 6 h, and then the percentage of CD4+ and Th1 cells was tested.




The caption:

Figure 2. Effects of LDR on T-cell cytotoxicity. (a) Schematic for the coculture system of 4T1 tumor cells and LDR (200 mGy)-treated splenocytes followed by PMA + ionomycin treatment for the evaluation of cytotoxic function by either CCK-8 or confocal imaging. (b) CCK-8 test was conducted on 4T1 cells alone or 4T1 cells cocultured with splenocytes (Spc) with indicated treatments for 24 h. (c) Representative confocal picture of cocultured cells stained by Calcein AM and PI. White arrowhead pointed at PI positive 4T1 cells. (d) The percentage of PI positive 4T1 tumor cells was calculated. (e) The death index of 4T1 cells with indicated treatment is shown



The caption:

Figure 4. Systemic effects of LDR on T cells in vivo. (a) Schematic for testing the effect of LDR on peripheral and splenic T cells in LDR-treated mice for 14 days with or without PMA + ionomycin treatment. (b,c) The percentage of CD4+ and Th1 naïve T cells from blood (b) or spleen (c) in LDR-treated mice is shown. (d,e) The percentage of CD4+ and Th1 T cells from blood (d) or spleen (e) treated by PMA + ionomycin in LDR-treated mice is shown.




The caption:

Figure 5. Systemic effects of LDR on T cells from tumor-bearing mice. (a) Schematic for testing the effect of LDR on naïve or activated peripheral and splenic T cells in LDR-treated tumor-bearing mice. (b) The tumor growth curve from mice treated with or without LDR is shown (n = 5). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA analysis; **p < 0.01. (c) The picture of dissected tumors is shown. (d) The tumor weight of the two groups is compared. (e,f) The percentage of CD4+ and Th1 naïve T cells from blood (e) or spleen (f) in LDR-treated tumor-bearing mice is shown. (g,h) The percentage of CD4+ and Th1 T cells from blood (g) or spleen (h) treated by PMA + ionomycin in LDR-treated tumor-bearing mice is shown.


...and so on...

The graphics in the paper shown as well as those not shown reflect support for a concept known as hormesis, a health benefit of exposure to low levels of radiation, in contrast to the suppositions of the LNT. Personally, I would not be surprised if hormesis turns out to be a true effect, although it is not by any means proven to be so, in this case it is. Life evolved on this planet in a radiation field much larger than the one we now experience, since potassium, an essential element in all living things generates low level radiation owing to the presence of 40K, a naturally occurring radioisotope with a half-life long enough (t1/2 = 1.248 billion years) to persist after the accretion of the Earth from what was clearly supernova(e) ejecta. If, to give one suggested figure, life appeared on Earth 3.7 billion years ago, 40K has experienced close to three half-lives of nuclear decay, and was about 7.8 times more radioactive than it is today. It is therefore unsurprising that live evolved the capability to exist, and indeed thrive, in a radiation field.

The paper concludes like this:

In summary, we have proposed a critical effect of environmental low-dose radiation from 137Cs and probably other environmental radioactive nuclides on the immune system, that is, the specific upregulation on inflammatory and tumoridical Th1 immunity. This effect is exerted through the LDR-induced mitochondrial DNA-STING-T-bet pathway. With further study and a more complete understanding of the effect of LDR on human immunity, the handling of radioactive nuclides and the potential application of LDR can be exploited for broader and more effective disease prevention and treatment.


I do realize that many people have been trained to think that the results claimed here are counterintuitive, but science is not religious cant, nor is it immune from human biases outside of dogma. Fear of radiation, in my view, has led to vast environmental destruction from which it is increasingly a long shot that humanity may recover.

Have as pleasant a Sunday afternoon, in your shattering country.


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Effect of Low Dose Radiation on Immune Function (Original Post) NNadir Sunday OP
Low Dose Radiation Question for anyone Oneear Sunday #1
Not being versed in 99.6% of the information in this article. marked50 Sunday #2
The study offers inferences, not hard and fast conclusions about... NNadir Monday #3
Gracias. It does indeed. n/t marked50 Monday #4

Oneear

(305 posts)
1. Low Dose Radiation Question for anyone
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 11:28 AM
Sunday

What about the Cancer Patients and the Microplastics in our Bodies? What does that do when heated?

marked50

(1,457 posts)
2. Not being versed in 99.6% of the information in this article.
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 06:26 PM
Sunday

Can you relate a layman version of the conclusions of this study.

Like : What type of low-dose radiation are we talking about?
What are the end effects to be concerned about?
Should we avoid something?

Thanks....

NNadir

(35,006 posts)
3. The study offers inferences, not hard and fast conclusions about...
Mon Jan 27, 2025, 07:56 AM
Monday

Last edited Mon Jan 27, 2025, 08:44 AM - Edit history (1)

...human health.

It was conducted in mice, not higher species. That said, so was the study 80 years ago on which our radiation regulations are based.

The implication is that the conclusions draw 80 years ago were wrong. (Dr. Calabrese contends they were fraudulent.)

In this study the authors utilized gamma radiation from 137 Cs, a radioactive isotope of cesium that is commonly found in used nuclear fuel, where it is a fission product.

The main thing to be concerned about is the public perception of radiation that has been a millstone around the use of nuclear energy, thus driving the collapse of the planetary atmosphere.

We should avoid foolish interpretations of risk. These perceptions, which are absurd, are killing the planet. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks for your interest.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Effect of Low Dose Ra...