Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumKilling California for a Snack
Lynda and Stewart Resnick the oligarch pistachio farmers of Beverly Hills are going viral. Influencers are out making TikToks, tweets and reels. Theyre outraged to find out that one Los Angeles billionaire family controls more water than Los Angeles uses in an entire year.
The viral interest in the Resnicks story makes sense. Its connected to the fact that while fires are raging across the Los Angeles area, there are reports that fire hydrants are tapped out. Theres no water left to fight the fires, yet you have this family, with its ridiculous mini-Versailles mansion on Sunset Boulevard, hoarding an incomprehensible amount of water. I get the outrage. It is crazy that one family can seize control of so much water in a state thats been bled dry for a century or more.
The viral interest in the Resnicks story makes sense. Its connected to the fact that while fires are raging across the Los Angeles area, there are reports that fire hydrants are tapped out. Theres no water left to fight the fires, yet you have this family, with its ridiculous mini-Versailles mansion on Sunset Boulevard, hoarding an incomprehensible amount of water. I get the outrage. It is crazy that one family can seize control of so much water in a state thats been bled dry for a century or more.
The Resnicks control a huge amount of water. They use it to irrigate their vast holdings of pistachios and almonds and citrus. And their holdings are vast: around 300 square miles of land spread around the Central Valley. Thats 10 times the size of Manhattan. But the problem with the Resnicks is not that theyre hoarding water.
Los Angeles is the most powerful city in California and it itself is a massive water baron that has huge amounts of water in storage water that the city continuously plunders from regions hundreds of miles away. One of L.A.s aqueducts crosses state lines into Arizona to take water from the Colorado River; another stretches for over 200 miles and reaches 3,500 feet above sea level into the Sierra Nevada Mountains; a third taps water from a dam 550 miles north of L.A. Its not about the lack of water in Los Angeles. Its about the larger political-technological machine that both L.A. and the Resnicks are plugged into.
Los Angeles is the most powerful city in California and it itself is a massive water baron that has huge amounts of water in storage water that the city continuously plunders from regions hundreds of miles away. One of L.A.s aqueducts crosses state lines into Arizona to take water from the Colorado River; another stretches for over 200 miles and reaches 3,500 feet above sea level into the Sierra Nevada Mountains; a third taps water from a dam 550 miles north of L.A. Its not about the lack of water in Los Angeles. Its about the larger political-technological machine that both L.A. and the Resnicks are plugged into.
Im talking about the terraforming system that has been built over the last century in California.
This system, which involves massive dams and thousands of miles of aqueducts, moves water from the north of the state to the south.(Take note Chump) It is nominally owned by the public and run by a democratic process. But thats mostly a ruse. The truth is, from the very beginning, this system has been under the control of a local California oligarchy made up mostly of billionaire farmers and real estate speculators. The basic function of this terraforming system is to move water from Californias mountains to Californias semi-arid valleys and coastal areas in order to fuel speculative agriculture and suburban development.
This system, which involves massive dams and thousands of miles of aqueducts, moves water from the north of the state to the south.(Take note Chump) It is nominally owned by the public and run by a democratic process. But thats mostly a ruse. The truth is, from the very beginning, this system has been under the control of a local California oligarchy made up mostly of billionaire farmers and real estate speculators. The basic function of this terraforming system is to move water from Californias mountains to Californias semi-arid valleys and coastal areas in order to fuel speculative agriculture and suburban development.
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/killing-california-for-a-snack/
This insane vanity that man can control the environment/weather/all life on Earth will come screeching to a halt in the next few years.
From the rich nuts in Florida saying "we're going to rebuild bigger and better" in the immediate aftermath of the increasingly more powerful, destructive and deadly hurricanes to the so-called liberals in California who really think they're going to rebuild these burned out LA suburbs:
Wake Up!
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Killing California for a Snack (Original Post)
Brenda
Friday
OP
eppur_se_muova
(37,976 posts)1. Water usage in CA ag has always been crazy.
Cost of water has been subsidized by BLM and Bureau of Reclamation so extensively that huge farms have grown up to take advantage of water which is sometimes ~90% paid for by taxpayers.
I wouldn't dismiss either pistachios or almonds as a "snack" -- they are an important part of many diets, especially Middle Eastern, vegan, and vegetarian. But crops, in general, should be grown where there is water for them. Big ag in CA has actually used water from huge water projects to grow alfalfa, and pasturage for horses -- very inefficient choices. And because it's all so heavily subsidized, big owners get obscenely rich because they're only paying a fraction of the real costs.