Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumInside the Fossil Fuel Industry's Climate-Denial Social Media Echo Chamber
From 2008 to 2023, nine of the nations largest oil, agrichemical and plastics trade groups and corporations posted thousands of times on the social media platform X, and their messaging on environmental issues was strikingly obstructive for climate policy and action, a study published in the journal PLOS Climate concludes.
The study found that all of the organizations, including the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), were mentioned by at least four of the other groups essentially creating an echo chamber for similar messages. The groups also frequently tagged regulators and the media in their posts, with researchers finding the Environmental Protection Agency was tagged 795 times and the Wall Street Journal, the most mentioned media organization, tagged 517 times out of more than 125,000 posts.
The study found that all of the organizations, including the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), were mentioned by at least four of the other groups essentially creating an echo chamber for similar messages. The groups also frequently tagged regulators and the media in their posts, with researchers finding the Environmental Protection Agency was tagged 795 times and the Wall Street Journal, the most mentioned media organization, tagged 517 times out of more than 125,000 posts.
We know that all three of these sectors [studied] are dependent on petrochemicals and we were interested to know, does that mean that theyre all communicating with each other? Does it mean theyre sharing the same communications message, in relation to how petrochemicals are managed? lead author Alaina Kinol told DeSmog. It seems like the answer is they are communicating with each other because theyre all tweeting at each other.
----
Outside academics reached by DeSmog said the study raises questions about whether the three industries might be deliberately coordinating their messaging.
This paper is interesting because it shows that the fossil fuel industry, plastics industry and agricultural chemicals industry all promote forms of climate denial on social media, and their messages are largely aligned with each other, said Ben Franta, associate professor of climate litigation at the University of Oxford. Is that alignment intentional? Are these industries engaging in a joint enterprise to deceive consumers and the public about petrochemical products and climate change?
----
Outside academics reached by DeSmog said the study raises questions about whether the three industries might be deliberately coordinating their messaging.
This paper is interesting because it shows that the fossil fuel industry, plastics industry and agricultural chemicals industry all promote forms of climate denial on social media, and their messages are largely aligned with each other, said Ben Franta, associate professor of climate litigation at the University of Oxford. Is that alignment intentional? Are these industries engaging in a joint enterprise to deceive consumers and the public about petrochemical products and climate change?
Ya think?
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/inside-fossil-fuel-industrys-climate-denial-social-media-echo-chamber/
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inside the Fossil Fuel Industry's Climate-Denial Social Media Echo Chamber (Original Post)
Brenda
Jan 22
OP
Yep. Wait until someone notices how they manipulate the business and financial media too.
Think. Again.
Jan 22
#1
Think. Again.
(20,750 posts)1. Yep. Wait until someone notices how they manipulate the business and financial media too.
I vacillate between there being absolutely no chance of anyone stopping this train to maybe people who could stop this really are "unaware" how bad it is.
Sadly I think we are Romans watching it burn.
Think. Again.
(20,750 posts)3. I strongly suspect Nov. 5th stopped the last chances we had...
The best we can hope for now is maybe some of us surviving the rest of this century, but our societies certainly won't.
Brenda
(1,396 posts)4. I agree with you about that
It's a terrible position to be in as conservationists/environmentalists. I'm not a climatologist but I worked with them decades ago. They warned governments and the world but they were overwhelmed by fossil fuel money.
I really did not think societal collapse would happen in my lifetime (I'm 65) but it is happening right before my eyes.