Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"If You're Not Doing Anything, Why Should We"? Utility Appeals To Eco-Ratepayers One More Offloading Of Responsibility
Its not unusual to see individuals championed as heroes of climate action, with their efforts to install rooftop solar and buy electric cars promoted as pivotal in the fight to save the planet. Hero figures can motivate others to follow suit, but a University of Sydney study suggests the way the energy sector shapes this narrative sets individuals up to fail. Assoc Prof Tom van Laer, a co-author of the study, said the net zero hero story could be understood as the latest evolution in a long history of industry shifting environmental responsibility on to individuals.
EDIT
Van Laer said the net zero hero narrative was prevalent in the many public reports, press releases and documents published by energy companies and policymakers. These include encouraging behaviours like turning off unneeded appliances and upgrading to more efficient ones, framed as crucial personal contributions towards broader emission reduction goals, he said. However, such promotions often downplay the sectors own significant role in reducing emissions.
EDIT
Van Laer said individual climate warriors could be motivational and had helped drive a number of grassroots movements. But when individuals are put on a pedestal in the absence of tangible corporate and government policies to decarbonise, these narratives can breed feelings of helplessness and disengagement rather than empowerment.
The study cited a plastic bag ban in Chile as an example of putting the burden on the consumer without appropriately acknowledging the systemic, market-wide change needed to move the needle on waste. Consumers dont fall for that kind of scheme, Van Laer said. Theyre like, well, you know, if youre not doing anything, why should we?
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jan/19/net-zero-hero-myth-unfairly-shifts-burden-of-solving-climate-crisis-onto-individuals-study-finds
Martin68
(24,887 posts)No burden involved. Big win for the environment.
hatrack
(61,662 posts)That's why, especially in 'Murca.
Martin68
(24,887 posts)when it is actually the easiest way to benefit the environment for both businesses and consumers.
hatrack
(61,662 posts)Martin68
(24,887 posts)selfish to make easy changes to replace plastic bags. Make up your mind. Are the companies greedy or the consumers selfish. It can't be both because it is a commons sense solution to an important threat to the environment.
hatrack
(61,662 posts)Microplastics are in the Challenger Deep, on top of Everest and have been found in fetal cord blood and in blood samples in 100% of Americans surveyed in repeated medical studies. It's environmental kabuki/greenwashing, nothing more.
Martin68
(24,887 posts)hatrack
(61,662 posts).
Martin68
(24,887 posts)hatrack
(61,662 posts)Buh-bye.
Martin68
(24,887 posts)environmental challenges we face, might I suggest the following:
1. Capitalism will not self-regulate.
2. Only government can regulate industrial polluters for the purpose of decreasing environmental pollution.
3. Government will only regulate polluters if citizens vote for candidates who are willing to impose stricter regulations on industry.
4. If citizens vote for candidates that promise to decrease government regulation, then they share in the blame.
In other words, decreasing pollution will require both industry and citizens to take steps that neither is willing to take.