Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(61,662 posts)
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 10:08 AM Jan 19

"If You're Not Doing Anything, Why Should We"? Utility Appeals To Eco-Ratepayers One More Offloading Of Responsibility

It’s not unusual to see individuals championed as heroes of climate action, with their efforts to install rooftop solar and buy electric cars promoted as pivotal in the fight to save the planet. Hero figures can motivate others to follow suit, but a University of Sydney study suggests the way the energy sector shapes this narrative sets individuals up to fail. Assoc Prof Tom van Laer, a co-author of the study, said the “net zero hero” story could be understood as the latest evolution in a long history of industry shifting environmental responsibility on to individuals.

EDIT

Van Laer said the “net zero hero” narrative was prevalent in the many public reports, press releases and documents published by energy companies and policymakers. “These include encouraging behaviours like turning off unneeded appliances and upgrading to more efficient ones, framed as crucial personal contributions towards broader emission reduction goals,” he said. “However, such promotions often downplay the sector’s own significant role in reducing emissions.”

EDIT

Van Laer said individual climate warriors could be motivational and had helped drive a number of grassroots movements. But when individuals are put on a pedestal in the absence of tangible corporate and government policies to decarbonise, these narratives can breed feelings of helplessness and disengagement rather than empowerment.

The study cited a plastic bag ban in Chile as an example of putting the burden on the consumer without appropriately acknowledging the systemic, market-wide change needed to move the needle on waste. “Consumers don’t fall for that kind of scheme,” Van Laer said. “They’re like, well, you know, if you’re not doing anything, why should we?”

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jan/19/net-zero-hero-myth-unfairly-shifts-burden-of-solving-climate-crisis-onto-individuals-study-finds

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
1. How does banning plastic bags put a burden on consumers? Buy a few large cotton shopping bags and use them instead.
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 12:50 PM
Jan 19

No burden involved. Big win for the environment.

hatrack

(61,662 posts)
2. "It's not as CONVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENIENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 12:58 PM
Jan 19

That's why, especially in 'Murca.

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
3. But the poster's point was that this is a scam by companies to put the burden of conservation on consumers -
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 10:16 PM
Jan 19

when it is actually the easiest way to benefit the environment for both businesses and consumers.

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
5. So... what is your point? Your post criticizes companies for banning plastic bags, yet you say consumers are too
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 10:23 PM
Jan 19

selfish to make easy changes to replace plastic bags. Make up your mind. Are the companies greedy or the consumers selfish. It can't be both because it is a commons sense solution to an important threat to the environment.

hatrack

(61,662 posts)
6. It's both, because in the end, the horse is out of the barn . . .
Sun Jan 19, 2025, 10:25 PM
Jan 19

Microplastics are in the Challenger Deep, on top of Everest and have been found in fetal cord blood and in blood samples in 100% of Americans surveyed in repeated medical studies. It's environmental kabuki/greenwashing, nothing more.

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
7. Cynicism at its finest. Not worth doing anything because it too late and we're all fucked. Good luck with that!
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 01:11 PM
Jan 20

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
9. So you think plastic bags and microplastics are related to the CO2 level. You sound little confused.
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 01:25 PM
Jan 20

hatrack

(61,662 posts)
10. Two indicators among many. Oh, and feel free to stop reading my posts if they displease you.
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 01:26 PM
Jan 20

Buh-bye.

Martin68

(24,887 posts)
11. Likewise, I'm sorry my comments have displeased you. If you are looking for a realistic solution to the multitude of
Tue Jan 21, 2025, 11:18 AM
Jan 21

environmental challenges we face, might I suggest the following:

1. Capitalism will not self-regulate.

2. Only government can regulate industrial polluters for the purpose of decreasing environmental pollution.

3. Government will only regulate polluters if citizens vote for candidates who are willing to impose stricter regulations on industry.

4. If citizens vote for candidates that promise to decrease government regulation, then they share in the blame.

In other words, decreasing pollution will require both industry and citizens to take steps that neither is willing to take.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"If You're Not Doing Anyt...