California
Related: About this forumTwo girls, 9 and 11, awarded $31.5m after sister's California torture death
A lawsuit over the death of an 11-year-old California girl who was allegedly tortured and starved by her adoptive family reached a settlement on Friday totaling $31.5m from the city and county of San Diego as well as other groups.
The suit was brought on behalf of the two younger sisters of Arabella McCormack, who died in August 2022. The girls were ages six and seven at the time. Their adoptive mother, Leticia McCormack, and McCormacks parents, Adella and Stanley Tom, are facing charges of murder, conspiracy, child abuse and torture. They pleaded not guilty to all charges, and their criminal case is ongoing.
The lawsuit alleged a systemic failure across the city and several agencies and organizations to not report Arabella McCormacks abuse.
The settlement includes $10m from the city of San Diego, $10m from San Diego county, $8.5m from the Pacific Coast Academy and $3m from the Rock church, the sisters attorney, Craig McClellan, said. The school oversaw Arabella McCormacks home schooling, and her adoptive mother was an ordained elder at the church.
The amount is going to be enough to take care of the girls for the rest of the lives, McClellan said. But it isnt going to be enough and never could be enough
to replace their sister, nor is it going to erase the memories of what they went through.
The lawsuit said county social workers did not properly investigate abuse claims and two teachers at the Pacific Coast Academy failed to report the girls condition. It also said a San Diego police officer, a friend of the girls adoptive mother, gave the family a wooden paddle that they could use to hit their children.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/13/adopted-girl-torture-death-california-settlement
DHS is in such a hurry to get kids off their hands that they don't vet prospective adoptive parents properly and look at the wrong things.
stopdiggin
(14,871 posts)as 'religious freedom'. But - regardless of where the skewed (or extreme?) belief originates - how about the rights of a child .. ?
Firmly believe that there must be some kind of normative standards - when it comes to rights of a child or children ... At some point 'my child' absolutely does not (nor ever should) bear equivalence with 'my chattel'.
( And of course fully realize that this discussion can veer off in a thousand different directions .... Sports dads training up the next 'big league prospect'? Beauty pageant moms, tiger moms ... ? Home schoolers? Amish, and other 'separatist' cultures? Then of course you have the flip side - where the state is removing aboriginal children to effect 'acculturation'. I.e. 'white', 'Christian', ___ fill in the blank. Nevertheless .... A child has a 'right' (at some point?) - not to be treated like a personal project - or a lab experiment. Regardless the entity sitting as lab manager - or bio 'parent'.)
70sEraVet
(5,199 posts)but 'homeschooling' seems to often be a loop hole for abusing kids.
Any state that allows it (and I know there are many legitimate reasons for homeschooling) should also be required to have adequate staff to do monthly check-ins and to verify that the children are actually receiving an education.