Hegseth's hearing: What did we learn?
Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trumps pick for defense secretary, was a polished performer during his confirmation hearing with the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. Hegseth, known best for being a former host on Fox News, nimbly evaded most of the Democrats questions regarding allegations of excessive drinking, claims of sexual assault and his lack of managerial experience. Instead, the MAGA bandwagon steamrolled the discussion, complete with prolonged attacks from Republican senators about the supposed wokeness that taints the U.S. military.
Make sense of the latest news and debates with our daily newsletter
Evasion tactics and distractions aside (of which there were several), what did the hearing reveal about how the nominee would manage the Pentagon, if confirmed? Im joined by colleagues Karen Tumulty and Eugene Robinson to explore what we learned on Tuesday about Hegseth and what we didnt.
David Ignatius: Pete Hegseth was a poised and confident witness, always staying on message. Its obvious that hed make a good Pentagon spokesman, as one senator observed. But what kind of defense secretary would he be? What do you two think about his fitness for this enormously important job, after watching todays hearing?
Eugene Robinson: I think he looks and sounds the part in Donald Trumps imagination. And I heard nothing on Tuesday to make me think he remotely has the experience or the ability to do the job.
https://wapo.st/4jip4Pt
msongs
(70,379 posts)dpibel
(3,461 posts)I think "ham-fistedly" is more what the writer was looking for.
Or maybe "crudely and obviously."
flor-de-jasmim
(2,170 posts)He was smarmy, evasive, non-responsive and contemptuous of the process. I shudder to think of his future interactions with Congress if he gets through the process.