Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(117,314 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:17 AM Yesterday

Hegseth's hearing: What did we learn?

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for defense secretary, was a polished performer during his confirmation hearing with the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. Hegseth, known best for being a former host on Fox News, nimbly evaded most of the Democrats’ questions regarding allegations of excessive drinking, claims of sexual assault and his lack of managerial experience. Instead, the MAGA bandwagon steamrolled the discussion, complete with prolonged attacks from Republican senators about the supposed “wokeness” that taints the U.S. military.

Make sense of the latest news and debates with our daily newsletter
Evasion tactics and distractions aside (of which there were several), what did the hearing reveal about how the nominee would manage the Pentagon, if confirmed? I’m joined by colleagues Karen Tumulty and Eugene Robinson to explore what we learned on Tuesday about Hegseth — and what we didn’t.

David Ignatius: Pete Hegseth was a poised and confident witness, always staying on message. It’s obvious that he’d make a good Pentagon spokesman, as one senator observed. But what kind of defense secretary would he be? What do you two think about his fitness for this enormously important job, after watching today’s hearing?

Eugene Robinson: I think he looks and sounds the part — in Donald Trump’s imagination. And I heard nothing on Tuesday to make me think he remotely has the experience or the ability to do the job.

https://wapo.st/4jip4Pt

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hegseth's hearing: What did we learn? (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday OP
we learned.......hes got the job? msongs Yesterday #1
Nimbly evaded? dpibel Yesterday #2
I'm with you on this. flor-de-jasmim Yesterday #3
He was obviously annoyed that he had to answer questions from women Walleye Yesterday #5
I learned that I'm glad I'm not a young woman working in his office Walleye Yesterday #4

dpibel

(3,461 posts)
2. Nimbly evaded?
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:42 AM
Yesterday

I think "ham-fistedly" is more what the writer was looking for.

Or maybe "crudely and obviously."

flor-de-jasmim

(2,170 posts)
3. I'm with you on this.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 03:01 AM
Yesterday

He was smarmy, evasive, non-responsive and contemptuous of the process. I shudder to think of his future interactions with Congress if he gets through the process.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Hegseth's hearing: What d...