Once again, corporate M$M shill, NYT, exposes its REAL position....
... in a editorial board editorial:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/11/opinion/editorials/donald-trump-2024-unfit.html?rsrc=flt&unlocked_article_code=1.Nk4.GPEh.2SBTLLtUFCcS&smid=url-share
I'm canceling my subscription!!?!!?!
displacedvermoter
(3,395 posts)but you wouldn't know it -- from their coverage of events and polling since then -- that they really meant it. Yes, they are a corporate voice and their leadership has said taking a stand on the side of democracy is not part of their mission.
reACTIONary
(6,203 posts).... republish it today. I know that because it is disclosed at the top of the article.
Could you please explain how editorializing against TSF in July.... and then reprinting the editorial today at the start of early voting.... fits in with the alleged directive to take a stand against democracy?
Inquiring minds want to know!
Response to reACTIONary (Original post)
Clouds Passing This message was self-deleted by its author.
reACTIONary
(6,203 posts)... at the national level. How does editorializing against him fit in with being facist?
Clouds Passing
(3,200 posts)bothsiderism, Dump propaganda and jabs at Democrats.
reACTIONary
(6,203 posts).... instances, but I read the NYT everyday, and it doesn't seem prevalent to me.
Clouds Passing
(3,200 posts)reACTIONary
(6,203 posts).... the Times/Siena poll is somehow "biased". It has, however, the highest rating at 538. It seems that whoever wrote this article is conflating "news I'd rather not know about" with "bias".
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/
It also complained that NYT does not report TSF's verbal stumbles. But doing a quick search shows that they are not remiss:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/30/us/politics/trump-biden-age.html?unlocked_article_code=1.N04.ElGt.gnRzYabqzZf4&smid=url-share
reACTIONary
(6,203 posts)... assertive and conclusionary without much in the way of evidence. He used to like the Times when he was a kid, then changed his mind when he became a regular reader. Some people agree with him, some don't. OK. Big deal.
The Times did report that polls showed a lot of discontent over Bidens age. I didn't agree with that discontent and still don't, but we know now how that turned out. I don't agree with the majority, but it seems we are better off now than we were. So, do we thank the NYT? Or maybe they were just doing their job.
The Times has also reported Trumps felony convictions and that he is an adjudicated rapist. Mr. Gravitose doesn't deny it, but for some reason he isn't happy with it either. Oh well.
If you don't like the Times, don't read it.
Clouds Passing
(3,200 posts)reACTIONary
(6,203 posts).... I didn't mean to accuse you of scapegoating. Edited the post.
Clouds Passing
(3,200 posts)Clouds Passing
(3,200 posts)Thanks reACTIONary.
ananda
(31,054 posts)I miss the games, but boycotting fascists
is essential.