Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(67,506 posts)
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 02:50 PM Jul 2

U.S. Olympic canoeist David 'Davey' Hearn charged in Reflecting Pool vandalism

Last edited Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: NBC News

U.S. Olympic canoeist David “Davey” Hearn was indicted Thursday on a single count of destruction of property following his arrest last month at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Hearn was indicted in D.C. Superior Court on the felony charge.

Hearn previously told NBC News that he was arrested and detained for five hours on June 19 after he touched a piece of the detached coating in the pool. He said he had stopped at the landmark during a bike ride “to satisfy my curiosity as a citizen of what was happening with all the algae and the peeling blue coating.”

Hearn said he did not remove, tear, or destroy any of the coating.

-snip-

Jul. 2, 2026, 2:34 PM EDT
By Ryan J. Reilly, Marco Gacina and Minyvonne Burke


Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/us-olympian-david-hearn-charged-reflecting-pool-vandalism-rcna352788

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Olympic canoeist David 'Davey' Hearn charged in Reflecting Pool vandalism (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2 OP
I hope they don't order a firing squad. PittBlue Jul 2 #1
Operation Distraction still ongoing sakabatou Jul 2 #2
Arrested on phony charges popsdenver Jul 2 #46
Said they have their own witnesses snowybirdie Jul 2 #3
Will they testify they saw him with a knife cutting a 300' gash in the middle of the pool Martin Eden Jul 2 #15
Dragging it along his canoe...? displacedvermoter Jul 2 #42
They lied. There are no witnesses because he did nothing illegal. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #16
Hearn is facing a 10 year prison sentence because Trump needs a scapegoat for his blithering incompetence. LudwigPastorius Jul 2 #4
DOJ will lose this case. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #14
Not at all relevant Cirsium Jul 2 #32
DOJ will lose their lawsuit against him, hell they never even found a knife on him. KS Toronado Jul 2 #44
As I said... Cirsium Jul 2 #49
If facing 10 years, he gets a jury trial if he wants it. We know judge Jeanine's win-loss record on jury trials. 3Hotdogs Jul 3 #56
This is going to be almost as funny a trial as the sandwich thrower one jgmiller Jul 2 #5
I don't think it's funny LisaL Jul 2 #7
Nothing funny about a 10-year sentence... regnaD kciN Jul 2 #9
They haven't succeeded in several other cases. onenote Jul 2 #11
Pirro couldn't kick a duck in the ass. . . DinahMoeHum Jul 2 #43
You don't think that the DOJ will comb through every last word that he posted on social media over the past decade? LudwigPastorius Jul 3 #53
Do you think they didn't do that in the other cases they lost? onenote Jul 3 #61
Can they televise the jury trial? BarbD Jul 2 #6
He definitely should demand the jury trial. LisaL Jul 2 #8
It's a federal case, so no. LeftInTX Jul 2 #12
What evidence could they have shown a grand jury? Accurate evidence or misleading evidence? nt wiggs Jul 2 #10
Body cam video.... SergeStorms Jul 2 #20
As I recall he was LisaL Jul 2 #28
Probably not. SergeStorms Jul 2 #34
Isn't the pool under 24/7 video surveillance ? Jarqui Jul 2 #50
Sounds like they were more upset over Hearns attitude than anything. LeftInTX Jul 2 #13
I agree... I think the case will be thrown out in the end...just like with the other cases slightlv Jul 2 #18
Hearn can decide if he wants a jury or bench trial. LeftInTX Jul 2 #19
I think he definitely should demand a jury trial. LisaL Jul 2 #26
MaddowBlog-Grand jury indicts former Olympian in Trump DOJ's Reflecting Pool vandalism case LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2 #17
Bullshit. It won't hold up in court. Incredibly stupid of the Trump regime. They are desperate to find a scapegoat for Martin68 Jul 2 #21
I want to read the indictment! LeftInTX Jul 2 #22
To be another failed prosecution BeneteauBum Jul 2 #23
He was just helping to remove the paint. It all needs removed so he was helping. twodogsbarking Jul 2 #24
He says he didn't remove anything and I believe him. LisaL Jul 2 #25
Me too but it does all need removed. twodogsbarking Jul 2 #37
Well, if he gets thirty-three more felonies, he can run for president Grim Chieftain Jul 2 #27
Jury nullification is written all over this case. oasis Jul 2 #29
I don't see why jury nullification should be needed in this case. LisaL Jul 2 #30
Jurors will have already made up their minds oasis Jul 2 #35
The magnitude of... GiqueCee Jul 2 #31
Waitaminnit - If the pool coating is so flimsy that he can destroy it "with his bare hands" then it's a complete failure NBachers Jul 2 #33
Tell the guy to start a Go Fund Me for legal expenses...... Bengus81 Jul 2 #36
He already has a star lawyer who immediately took up his case. drray23 Jul 2 #39
There is a gofundme for him. LisaL Jul 3 #58
Thanks! I would have put the bar higher and given the rest to a charity Bengus81 Jul 4 #62
Trump (Dumb) and Pirro (Dumber) democratsruletheday Jul 2 #38
Pathetic smoke and mirrors. They should be charging themselves for gross incompetence, and then driving a motorcade Karasu Jul 2 #40
If Judge Winebox is in charge he's got it licked Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2 #41
Good Grief!!! Rhiannon12866 Jul 2 #45
More prosecutors selling their souls to keep their jobs. Wonder Why Jul 2 #47
They all are in the Trump regime...look no further that KashYAP Bengus81 Jul 3 #57
He was removing trash from the pool. BidenRocks Jul 2 #48
Yes, that is not vandalism purr-rat beauty Jul 2 #52
I'm surprised that he wasn't charged with a misdemeanor to avoid a jury. TomSlick Jul 2 #51
He could request a jury trial for a misdemeanor LeftInTX Jul 3 #54
What a grotesque miscarriage of justice... Hugin Jul 3 #55
This seems like a minor matter, but this could bring him down. mwb970 Jul 3 #59
I trust the justice system in this case. JohnnyRingo Jul 3 #60

popsdenver

(2,945 posts)
46. Arrested on phony charges
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:42 PM
Jul 2

charged with a Felony, I can't wait to see what the MAGAot Cops across America do next.........

He should demand a trial by jury, one or more will rule not guilty and that's all it takes.........

Trying to prove to the MAGA cult that it wasn't done by Trump and his shitty workers...............

Doesn't matter that who ever the cop was that signed the arrest warrant, committed perjury, along with all the witnesses.....

Martin Eden

(16,178 posts)
15. Will they testify they saw him with a knife cutting a 300' gash in the middle of the pool
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:31 PM
Jul 2

Then pulling up strongly to detach the liner from the bottom?

If not, then whatever the defendant did came AFTER the alleged vandalism.

LudwigPastorius

(15,361 posts)
4. Hearn is facing a 10 year prison sentence because Trump needs a scapegoat for his blithering incompetence.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:05 PM
Jul 2

Kafka couldn't have written it better.

Wiz Imp

(11,089 posts)
14. DOJ will lose this case.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:29 PM
Jul 2

It's a pain in the ASS for Hearn but he's not going to be found guilty. Afterwards, he can sue for vindictive pprosecution and probably net a nice sum of money.

Cirsium

(4,354 posts)
32. Not at all relevant
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:34 PM
Jul 2

Last edited Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:10 PM - Edit history (1)

First of all, it's a distinctly upper middle class viewpoint to look at catastrophic political and social problems and see civil lawsuits as some sort of solution. Here is the right-wing take: "oh, they're trying to sue and cash in." That's what the whole right-wing tort reform nonsense is about. Most people cannot afford to use the legal system to their advantage, and no one should be forced to in response to this sort of abuse of power and persecution of innocent people.

Secondly, the chilling effect on any dissent is what's important here, not whether or not he eventually wins in court. The administration is trying to set an example. Millions of people are now reconsidering what they do and what they say, lest they become victims of this lawless regime.

Next, we have the fact that this administration, like all dictatorial authoritarian regimes, doesn't give a hoot what a court says. So they lose this case, they'll ignore it or they'll go after somebody else.

Lastly, whether or not this particular individual wins in court or not, and whether or not he's able to cash in on some sort of lawsuit, nevertheless, he is suffering today. His life has been disrupted today.

Cirsium

(4,354 posts)
49. As I said...
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 10:59 PM
Jul 2

It isn't really relevant.

The DOJ will lose their lawsuit? I don't even knoiw what that means.

3Hotdogs

(15,848 posts)
56. If facing 10 years, he gets a jury trial if he wants it. We know judge Jeanine's win-loss record on jury trials.
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 07:10 AM
Jul 3

Still, the guy will be out the lawyer's fee.

jgmiller

(720 posts)
5. This is going to be almost as funny a trial as the sandwich thrower one
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:06 PM
Jul 2

MSNOW was just showing a split screen of Pirro describing how violent and offensive Hearn was and of video of him talking to the soldiers and the park police very calmly.

regnaD kciN

(27,769 posts)
9. Nothing funny about a 10-year sentence...
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:34 PM
Jul 2

…just because Dear Leader is feeling embarrassed.

And I wouldn’t be too confident about an acquittal, either. Regimes like this don’t stage show trials for “not guilty” verdicts. I’m sure they’ll manufacture as much evidence as they need to “prove” the vandalism.

onenote

(46,541 posts)
11. They haven't succeeded in several other cases.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:59 PM
Jul 2

And he's got a very good lawyer.

The statute he's being charged under reads as follows: Whoever maliciously injures or breaks or destroys, or attempts to injure or break or destroy, by fire or otherwise, any public or private property, whether real or personal, not his or her own, of the value of $1,000 or more, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, and if the property has some value shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or imprisoned for not more than 180 days, or both."

Typically, convicting someone of the crime of malicious destruction of property requires proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant acted with willful intent, not by accident or mistake, with ill will, spite, or a willful disregard of a known risk that the property would be harmed and without excuse or mitigating circumstances.

Pirro is going to have a tough time convincing a jury that someone who saw a floating piece of debris on the reflecting pool and picked it up acted with willful, malicious intent or that the value of the piece of floating debris was $1000 or more. My guess is that they were able to obtain the indictment by claiming that the value of the damage should measured against the value of the entire reflecting pool.

DinahMoeHum

(23,807 posts)
43. Pirro couldn't kick a duck in the ass. . .
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:34 PM
Jul 2

.. .unless she stood on a brick, and even then, odds are she'd miss the mark.

LudwigPastorius

(15,361 posts)
53. You don't think that the DOJ will comb through every last word that he posted on social media over the past decade?
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 12:01 AM
Jul 3

All they need is some anti-Trump posts, and a jury gullible enough to believe whoever they trot out as "witnesses", to put this guy in a federal prison.

onenote

(46,541 posts)
61. Do you think they didn't do that in the other cases they lost?
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 09:49 AM
Jul 3

And your lack of faith in DC juries is at odds with reality.

wiggs

(8,891 posts)
10. What evidence could they have shown a grand jury? Accurate evidence or misleading evidence? nt
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:36 PM
Jul 2

SergeStorms

(21,182 posts)
20. Body cam video....
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:41 PM
Jul 2

from the "arresting" officer, maybe, but what that would show......who knows? And I'm reasonably sure, if indeed there is video, that it won't be released publicly.

LisaL

(48,336 posts)
28. As I recall he was
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:25 PM
Jul 2

not touching anything inside the pool when arrested (he says he was away from the pool when approached by police), so I don't think the body cam video can possibly show anything supporting the arrest.

SergeStorms

(21,182 posts)
34. Probably not.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:39 PM
Jul 2

But we're talking about Trump's DOI (Department of Injustice) here. With them, anything is possible.

Jarqui

(10,945 posts)
50. Isn't the pool under 24/7 video surveillance ?
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:12 PM
Jul 2

Hasn't the media been asking to see it to establish someone did not slash the lining with a knife?

It will probably go the way of the Mar-A-Lago video tapes of the classified material...

LeftInTX

(35,321 posts)
13. Sounds like they were more upset over Hearns attitude than anything.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:10 PM
Jul 2

He used no tools.
Pirro said he used two hands. (Do they have video evidence???)
Two hands could imply pulling and tugging. (Do they have video evidence???) One hand could imply removing a lose piece.

I think this case will be thrown out or he will be found not guilty, unless there is something that I'm not understanding.

At the very worst, he would have pulled and tugged on a pool liner. But is that destruction?

slightlv

(8,334 posts)
18. I agree... I think the case will be thrown out in the end...just like with the other cases
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:38 PM
Jul 2

similar to it. All the ones where the only "evidence" is rump's vindictiveness on display and pirro's egomania and fantasm of her idol. Those two are so clearly seen through to their very core. But I didn't get one of the answers above... is a jury trial demanded or not because it's a Fed trial? I do hope so. I believe this is one where a jury of one's peers will throw it out at the first possible time.

LeftInTX

(35,321 posts)
19. Hearn can decide if he wants a jury or bench trial.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:41 PM
Jul 2

Although it's a "felony"...(cough, cough) .many federal misdemeanors are decided via bench trials. Didn't sandwich guy have a jury trial?

I would opt for jury trial. He's being "overcharged".

Even if he pulled and tugged at the thing, odds are if found guilty of vandalism, he would probably just be fined.

LetMyPeopleVote

(184,960 posts)
17. MaddowBlog-Grand jury indicts former Olympian in Trump DOJ's Reflecting Pool vandalism case
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:37 PM
Jul 2

Securing an indictment is one thing; securing a conviction in Washington against an Olympian who touched the Reflecting Pool is something else

It’s one thing for Jeanine Pirro to secure a dubious indictment through the grand jury process.

It’s something else for her to secure a conviction in DC against an Olympian who touched the Reflecting Pool.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-07-02T19:22:02.513Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-justice-department-indicts-former-olympian-in-odd-reflecting-pool-case

In recent weeks, as Donald Trump’s renovation project at the Reflecting Pool became an embarrassing fiasco, the president settled on a curious strategy to deflect blame. He contended “vandals” had secretly attacked the pool, and it was their intervention, rather than his incompetence, that ruined the Republican’s triumph....

Hearn recently told MS NOW’s Chris Hayes that he’d touched a piece of peeling blue paint toward the end of a bike ride.

“I didn’t think I’d done anything wrong, so I had no reason to think I was going to be arrested … and kind of before I knew it, I was being handcuffed,” Hearn said, adding that he made no effort to tear the pool’s coating.

His lawyer, Norm Eisen, soon after told The New York Times, “It is not a crime in America to touch water.”.....

Evidently, Trump’s Justice Department came to a different conclusion. On Thursday afternoon, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, whose recent prosecutorial track record has been as embarrassing as it has been political, announced that Hearn has been charged with one felony count of destruction of property in D.C. Superior Court.

According to the former Fox News host, who said at a press conference that she would not discuss any details about collected evidence, Hearn engaged in a “violent effort” and “willfully destroyed” public property with his bare hands. Pirro added that the defendant, if convicted, faces up to 10 years in prison.....

During the press conference, MS NOW’s Adam Hudacek asked the prosecutor how she squares charging an alleged pool vandal after Trump’s Justice Department pardoned Jan. 6 rioters who caused millions of dollars in damage at the U.S. Capitol. Pirro refused to answer.

Q: How can you square charging this alleged vandal when this DOJ has--


PIRRO: Already this is a problem


Q: Over 1,000 January 6 rioters who caused millions of damage--


PIRRO: Are you really talking about January 6? I'm not. Who's next. Not you! No!

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-07-02T19:05:50.968Z


Eisen, the defendant’s lawyer, added in a written statement, “Davey Hearn is innocent. These charges are outrageous and should be alarming to every American. This indictment reflects the administration’s effort to shift blame for their own failures. On the eve of our nation’s Independence Day, Americans should be deeply concerned by the misuse of government power against an ordinary citizen based on a concocted narrative. The justice system exists to determine facts, not to provide political cover.”

I am personally surprised that a grand jury issued this indictment. This case will never get to trial.

Martin68

(28,471 posts)
21. Bullshit. It won't hold up in court. Incredibly stupid of the Trump regime. They are desperate to find a scapegoat for
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 04:45 PM
Jul 2

Trump's series of colossal blunders as he fiddles with our sacred public spaces. Trump is the felon.

Grim Chieftain

(2,452 posts)
27. Well, if he gets thirty-three more felonies, he can run for president
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:24 PM
Jul 2

On the Republican ticket, of course. What a pathetic, shameful thing to do to this man.

LisaL

(48,336 posts)
30. I don't see why jury nullification should be needed in this case.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:30 PM
Jul 2

Touching peeling paint is an actual felony now?

oasis

(54,538 posts)
35. Jurors will have already made up their minds
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:54 PM
Jul 2

knowing this case is a joke. The’ll just be going through the motions with the “viore dire”, truth telling process.
It’s likely the jury poll will be from the D.C. area.

GiqueCee

(5,294 posts)
31. The magnitude of...
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:33 PM
Jul 2

... the Trump regime's evil can only be measured in astronomical terms. Solar units, parsecs, and lightyears. But let's invent a new unit of measure: How about a "Miller"? Now that would cover a LOT of ground!
I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to give Pol Pot a run for his money. Then he could charge admission to the killing fields.
Trump is an out-of-control monster. Do NOT underestimate his capacity for unbridled malice. And DON'T turn your back on him!
On the outside chance you're still on speaking terms with a MAGAt, take any and every opportunity to remind them that they OWN this motherfucker, and they WILL pay dearly for their perfidy, because he is going DOWN, and he is going down HARD.

Oh, and Mr. Hearn's lawyers must skin Trump's goons alive in court.

NBachers

(19,710 posts)
33. Waitaminnit - If the pool coating is so flimsy that he can destroy it "with his bare hands" then it's a complete failure
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 05:35 PM
Jul 2

Bengus81

(10,753 posts)
36. Tell the guy to start a Go Fund Me for legal expenses......
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 06:09 PM
Jul 2

Raise a million in a couple of hours.....

drray23

(8,878 posts)
39. He already has a star lawyer who immediately took up his case.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 07:45 PM
Jul 2

I think Norm Eisen. I would not be surprised if he did it pro Bono.

Bengus81

(10,753 posts)
62. Thanks! I would have put the bar higher and given the rest to a charity
Sat Jul 4, 2026, 07:57 AM
Jul 4

But it's great that he won't be bled dry because of Fat Hitler and Judge Winebox.

Karasu

(2,513 posts)
40. Pathetic smoke and mirrors. They should be charging themselves for gross incompetence, and then driving a motorcade
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:06 PM
Jul 2

over the damn thing.

Bengus81

(10,753 posts)
57. They all are in the Trump regime...look no further that KashYAP
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 07:43 AM
Jul 3

It's his job to come up with the newest FAKE assassination attempt on Trump. No doubt they want to pull one during the disaster "County Fair" but there's only 10-20 people there at any given moment.

TomSlick

(13,180 posts)
51. I'm surprised that he wasn't charged with a misdemeanor to avoid a jury.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:44 PM
Jul 2

I will be shocked if a DC jury convicts.

mwb970

(12,180 posts)
59. This seems like a minor matter, but this could bring him down.
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 08:34 AM
Jul 3

America's sympathy will be SOLIDLY behind Hearn and against the lying ahole and his drunken, shrieking bitch. I think this is going to become a BIG story because it so perfectly captures trump's constant targeting of innocents to suffer for his own endless screwups.

Gee, an olympian athlete vs. trump. Who will win?

JohnnyRingo

(21,122 posts)
60. I trust the justice system in this case.
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 09:08 AM
Jul 3

At worst, it'll come before a jury and evidence will be shown that will cripple the state's claims.
Unfortunately it may cost him some money to get that far and there's no justice in that. Perhaps he can Crowd Share.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Olympic canoeist Dav...