Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,678 posts)
Sat May 16, 2026, 10:36 PM 18 hrs ago

Ballroom security money nixed by Senate parliamentarian

Source: Politico

Ballroom security money nixed by Senate parliamentarian

Republicans proposed sending $1 billion to the Secret Service, with some to be used on the controversial White House project.


Artist renderings of the new White House East Wing and Ballroom are photographed Tuesday, March 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick) | AP

By Jordain Carney
05/16/2026 09:52 PM EDT
Updated: 05/16/2026 10:20 PM EDT

President Donald Trump’s hopes of using public funding to secure his proposed White House ballroom are under threat after a Senate official said Saturday a $1 billion Secret Service line item could not be included in a GOP immigration enforcement bill as drafted.

Elizabeth MacDonough, the chamber’s parliamentarian, ruled that the language aimed at enhancing Secret Service security measures would need to be reworked if Republicans want to pass the larger bill along party lines as planned, according to a statement from Budget Committee Democrats.

MacDonough, the Democrats said, struck the entire Secret Service provision because it included funding that fell outside of the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee, which included the language in their portion of the immigration enforcement bill. The administration estimated that approximately $220 million of the $1 billion would go toward the White House construction project.

“While we expect Republicans to change this bill to appease Trump, Democrats are prepared to challenge any change to this bill,” Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the top Budget Committee Democrat, said in a statement Saturday.

{snip}

Jennifer Scholtes contributed to this report.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/16/ballroom-funding-senate-parliamentarian-00924612



Reposted by Chris Geidner
https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social

*******
Jen Bendery
‪@jbendery.bsky.social‬

There it is. The Senate parliamentarian rules the $1 billion for Trump's ballroom in the GOP's budget reconciliation bill violates the rules + is subject to 60 votes vs 51.

Via budget committee Dems:


10:17 PM · May 16, 2026
******

There it is. The Senate parliamentarian rules the billion for Trump's ballroom in the GOP's budget reconciliation bill violates the rules + is subject to 60 votes vs 51.

Via budget committee Dems:

Jen Bendery (@jbendery.bsky.social) 2026-05-17T02:17:07.182Z
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ballroom security money nixed by Senate parliamentarian (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 18 hrs ago OP
So, either the Byrd Rule, or the filibuster, OR THE PARLIMENTARIAN, will be gone by next weekend. Got it lol. Volaris 17 hrs ago #1
Yuppp SSJVegeta 17 hrs ago #2
Been A While Since A Parliamentarian Was Fired... GB_RN 5 hrs ago #9
Let's hope that Trump forces the Republicans to throw out the Jim Crow filibuster rule Bluetus 17 hrs ago #3
But any legislation passed would still require the signature of the person in the oval debsy 8 hrs ago #8
Forcing him to veto a very popular bill is a big win. Bluetus 3 hrs ago #10
"if we get 51 Senate seats" J_William_Ryan 16 hrs ago #4
THIS. Karasu 13 hrs ago #6
This message was self-deleted by its author bmichaelh 14 hrs ago #5
YES!!!! underpants 8 hrs ago #7
Sorry if i sound preachy but c'mon...one billion dollars on a ballroom? CTyankee 2 hrs ago #11

Volaris

(11,793 posts)
1. So, either the Byrd Rule, or the filibuster, OR THE PARLIMENTARIAN, will be gone by next weekend. Got it lol.
Sat May 16, 2026, 11:10 PM
17 hrs ago

GB_RN

(3,586 posts)
9. Been A While Since A Parliamentarian Was Fired...
Sun May 17, 2026, 11:50 AM
5 hrs ago

And IIRC, the Repukes did it when the Parliamentarian ruled against them. And then, McConnell then hired McDonough. She’s ruled against them on more than a couple occasions, with speculation that she’d be fired.

Firing the Parliamentarian just for…reasons…would become just one more tit-for-tat that I’m not sure even Thune would want to get into.

But, I’ve been wrong in the past. Could be wrong now.

Bluetus

(3,069 posts)
3. Let's hope that Trump forces the Republicans to throw out the Jim Crow filibuster rule
Sat May 16, 2026, 11:44 PM
17 hrs ago

That way, if we get 51 Senate seats and control of the House, we can pass voting rights, Supreme Court reform and all the other things that the Jim Crow Party has been blocking.

debsy

(1,036 posts)
8. But any legislation passed would still require the signature of the person in the oval
Sun May 17, 2026, 08:50 AM
8 hrs ago

I still can’t bring myself to refer to him as potus.

So no legislation will pass for Dems until 2029 at the earliest.

Bluetus

(3,069 posts)
10. Forcing him to veto a very popular bill is a big win.
Sun May 17, 2026, 01:50 PM
3 hrs ago

That is part of how we get a Dem into thw WH in 2029.

People understand the veto. People don't understand the filibuster.

J_William_Ryan

(3,567 posts)
4. "if we get 51 Senate seats"
Sun May 17, 2026, 12:00 AM
16 hrs ago

And when Republicans get 51 Senate seats and control of the House, they repeal voting rights, Supreme Court reform, and enact a fascist agenda supported by the Jim Crow party.

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

CTyankee

(68,462 posts)
11. Sorry if i sound preachy but c'mon...one billion dollars on a ballroom?
Sun May 17, 2026, 02:27 PM
2 hrs ago

When there are people in the world who starve and suffer?

Even Marie "let them eat cake" Antoinette wouldn't say that...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ballroom security money n...