Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,856 posts)
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 02:05 PM 11 hrs ago

Appeals court clears way for U.S. to reopen border for asylum seekers

Source: Washington Post

A federal appeals court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump's declaration of an "invasion" at the U.S.-Mexico border was illegal, effectively clearing the way to reopen the United States to migrants seeking asylum.

It was not clear when asylum processing would resume, and the Trump administration is likely to appeal the decision. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump issued the proclamation, "Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion," on the first day of his second term, barring entry to asylum seekers for public safety, health and economic reasons "until I issue a finding that the invasion at the southern border has ceased." Since then, Border Patrol apprehensions have fallen to the lowest levels in decades after spiking to record highs under the Biden administration.....

"We conclude that the INA's text, structure, and history make clear that in supplying power to suspend entry by Presidential proclamation, Congress did not intend to grant the Executive the expansive removal authority it asserts," the opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said.....

"The court's opinion does not mean there are now open borders, but only that the United States will no longer be one of the few countries in the world who after World War II does not provide a hearing for those fleeing persecution," said Lee Gelernt, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney who argued the appeal. "The court properly made clear that the president cannot simply waive away the laws enacted by Congress."

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/04/24/court-border-asylum-trump




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court clears way for U.S. to reopen border for asylum seekers (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago OP
Was about to hit "post" BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #1
I very rarely beat you on these stories LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #3
Was spending time in advanced search to get how far back this went! BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #4
trump tried to suspend all immigration laws by executive order LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #2
Trump's effort to bar migrants from claiming asylum at the border rejected, setting up possible Supreme Court showdown LetMyPeopleVote 6 hrs ago #5
"This confirms that President Trump cannot on his own bar people from seeking asylum, that it is Congress that has manda riversedge 5 hrs ago #6

BumRushDaShow

(170,963 posts)
4. Was spending time in advanced search to get how far back this went!
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 02:57 PM
10 hrs ago


This appeal was heard back in November 2025, with the case originally filed in February 2025, and lower court ruling in July 2025!

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,856 posts)
2. trump tried to suspend all immigration laws by executive order
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 02:31 PM
11 hrs ago

Only congress has this power. I am also surprised that it took 15 months to get this ruling



In a case we filed a brief in, the DC Circuit just found that the president acted illegally by attempting to suspend ALL IMMIGRATION LAW for people arrested by Border Patrol. It was so blatantly obvious from the start that he had no power to do this, but it's taken 15 months!


LetMyPeopleVote

(180,856 posts)
5. Trump's effort to bar migrants from claiming asylum at the border rejected, setting up possible Supreme Court showdown
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 07:40 PM
6 hrs ago

trump issued an executive order that banned asylum without congressional approval. It took 15 months but a divided court struck down this executive order




https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/24/politics/trump-migrant-claiming-asylum-rejected-appeals-court

A divided federal appeals court on Friday rejected President Donald Trump’s effort to unilaterally bar migrants who cross the US-Mexico border from seeking asylum, teeing up a likely showdown over the policy at the Supreme Court.

The 2-1 decision is a major defeat for a signature component of Trump’s immigration agenda. Administration officials repeatedly cited a proclamation the president issued on his first day back in office that sought to end asylum by any means when touting a sharp decline in unlawful crossings along the Southern border.

But the DC Circuit Court of Appeals said that proclamation and the federal rules stemming from it ignored laws Congress enacted, including the Immigration and Nationality Act.

“Barring foreign individuals who are physically present in the United States from applying for asylum and, if they make the statutory showing that they are eligible, from being considered to receive it cannot be squared with the statute,” wrote Judge Michelle Childs, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, in the decision. She was joined by Judge Nina Pillard, a Barack Obama appointee.

riversedge

(81,234 posts)
6. "This confirms that President Trump cannot on his own bar people from seeking asylum, that it is Congress that has manda
Fri Apr 24, 2026, 08:21 PM
5 hrs ago


Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal

Story by MICHAEL KUNZELMAN and LINDSAY WHITEHURST • 7h •

................

Advocates welcome the ruling
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that previous legal action had already paused the asylum ban, and the ruling won’t change much on the ground.

The ruling, however, represents another legal defeat for a centerpiece policy of the president.

“This confirms that President Trump cannot on his own bar people from seeking asylum, that it is Congress that has mandated that asylum seekers have a right to apply for asylum and the President cannot simply invoke his authority to sustain,” said Reichlin-Melnick.

Advocates say the right to request asylum is enshrined in the country’s immigration law and say denying migrants that right puts people fleeing war or persecution in grave danger....................




Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court clears way ...