Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(62,546 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 04:39 PM Wednesday

US Renewable Power Generation Beats Natural Gas for the First Time, Defying Trump

Source: Gizmodo

Since taking office, President Trump has been waging war on renewables, leveraging policy rollbacks, permitting delays, and expanded oil and gas leasing to shift the nation’s energy economy back toward fossil fuels. But new data suggests his efforts may be in vain.

According to national electricity generation data from the energy think tank Ember, renewables—including wind, solar, hydropower, and bioenergy—produced more than a third of U.S. electricity in March 2026, surpassing natural gas across an entire month for the first time. Natural gas has been the nation’s leading power source for the past decade, but it appears a new champion may be on the rise.

To be clear, one month does not necessarily signal a lasting shift. This data also reflects a seasonal drop in power demand, as mild spring weather typically reduces the need for coal- and gas-powered heating. But according to Ember, last month’s fossil fuel generation fell to its lowest March level in at least 25 years, while renewable generation rose to its highest March level.

This is an important milestone. It shows that the gap between renewables and natural gas has narrowed significantly as solar, wind, and biofuels have grown, despite Trump’s best efforts to stymie them.

-snip-

Read more: https://gizmodo.com/us-renewable-power-generation-beats-natural-gas-for-the-first-time-defying-trump-2000746918

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Renewable Power Generation Beats Natural Gas for the First Time, Defying Trump (Original Post) highplainsdem Wednesday OP
Solar/wind/batteries Miguelito Loveless Wednesday #1
Electricity isn't cheap in places with aggressive renewable energy programs. hunter Yesterday #2
AND ???? Jack Valentino Yesterday #3
Here are some examples, in U.S.A. cents: hunter 16 hrs ago #6
That's because you still have interference Miguelito Loveless 19 hrs ago #4
There are no real hurdles to installing solar where I live. hunter 17 hrs ago #5
I donate my excess generation Miguelito Loveless 14 hrs ago #7

Miguelito Loveless

(5,810 posts)
1. Solar/wind/batteries
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 07:01 PM
Wednesday

Technology that works now, not 5/10/20 years from now. Cheap to build, cheap to run. Free fuel for the next several billion years. .

hunter

(40,757 posts)
2. Electricity isn't cheap in places with aggressive renewable energy programs.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:36 AM
Yesterday

California, Denmark, Germany, for example, have some of the most expensive electricity in the developed world.

hunter

(40,757 posts)
6. Here are some examples, in U.S.A. cents:
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 01:47 PM
16 hrs ago

In nuclear powered France residential electricity costs 34 cents a kilowatt hour. The carbon intensity of that electricity is 24 gCO₂eq/kWh. ( Low carbon intensities are good. )

In wind-and-gas powered Denmark the numbers are 44 cents and 103 gCO₂eq/kWh.

Here in solar-and-gas powered California, where I live, it's 42 cents and 123 gCO₂eq/kWh.

Germany is a basket case. Their plan to quit coal and nuclear power in favor of a hybrid gas-wind-solar electric grid went horribly wrong. They pay 47 cents a kilowatt hour for electricity and their carbon intensity is 323 gCO₂eq/kWh

I think it's pretty obvious at this point (to me anyways) that "renewable" energy cannot displace fossil fuels entirely, which is something we need to do. At a certain point adding additional wind or solar to an electric grid increases the price of electricity without a proportional decrease in greenhouse gas emissions.

Miguelito Loveless

(5,810 posts)
4. That's because you still have interference
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 10:08 AM
19 hrs ago

from utilities. They oppose roof top solar (private ownership) but are all in for utility ownership. My state allows rooftop solar, but the utilities do all they can to stymie the process. The other problem is the tariff rates are still set based on the price of methane, rather than the actual cost of solar/wind. For example, my utility charges its customers roughly 12¢ /kWh, whereas my solar array generates power for 5¢/kWh. They create a lot of barriers to rooftop solar, but that is a regulatory reform issue.

We must fight hard to permit rooftop solar, which is far cheaper than utility solar.

hunter

(40,757 posts)
5. There are no real hurdles to installing solar where I live.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:25 PM
17 hrs ago

About a third of the homes in my neighborhood have it, the schools and hospitals have it, many of the big box stores have it, and the nearby supermarket has it shading their parking lot. ( Parking lot solar is very nice on hot sunny days. Everyone can park in the shade. )

The only problem I have with that is that it raises the overall cost of electricity for people who can't install solar because they don't own the buildings they live in. In effect residential solar becomes a regressive tax on electricity. Lower income people end up subsidizing the solar installations of affluent people who like to brag about their electric meters running backwards.

Miguelito Loveless

(5,810 posts)
7. I donate my excess generation
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 03:27 PM
14 hrs ago

to the utility's low income program. I wish I could cut the utility out as the middleman, but I have to work through their program.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Renewable Power Genera...