Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(62,491 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 01:59 PM Monday

Meta Is Warned That Facial Recognition Glasses Will Arm Sexual Predators

Source: Wired

More than 70 civil liberties, domestic violence, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+, labor, and immigrant advocacy organizations are demanding that Meta abandon plans to deploy face recognition on its Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses, warning that the feature—reportedly known inside the company as “Name Tag”—would hand stalkers, abusers, and federal agents the ability to silently identify strangers in public.

The coalition, which includes the ACLU, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Fight for the Future, Access Now, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, is demanding Meta kill the feature before launch, after internal documents surfaced showing the company hoped to use the current “dynamic political environment” as cover for the rollout, betting that civil society groups would have their resources “focused on other concerns.”

Name Tag, as revealed in February by The New York Times, would work through the artificial intelligence assistant built into Meta's smart glasses, allowing wearers to pull up information about people in their field of view. Engineers have reportedly been weighing two versions of the feature: one that would only identify people the wearer is already connected to on a Meta platform, and a broader version that could recognize anyone with a public account on a Meta service such as Instagram.

The coalition wants Meta to scrap the feature entirely. In a letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Monday, it argues that face recognition in inconspicuous consumer eyewear “cannot be resolved through product design changes, opt-out mechanisms, or incremental safeguards.” Bystanders in public have no meaningful way to consent to being identified, it says.

-snip-



Read more: https://www.wired.com/story/meta-ray-ban-oakley-smart-glasses-no-face-recognition-civil-society/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meta Is Warned That Facial Recognition Glasses Will Arm Sexual Predators (Original Post) highplainsdem Monday OP
Why do you think they are doing it? RockRaven Monday #1
Zuck: good point! I'll raise the price! unblock Monday #2
"stalkers, abusers, and federal agents" GenThePerservering Monday #3
Of late, they're one and the same. paleotn Monday #7
I don't know much about this. But why would a regular person want this ? JI7 Monday #4
Simple. They wouldn't. Not a normal person anyway. paleotn Monday #6
Who in their right mind would think THIS was a good idea? paleotn Monday #5
Bundy bifocal stalker specs. rubbersole Monday #8
Feature, not a bug. n/t CousinIT Monday #9
BUT...imagine an ICE situation... 3825-87867 Monday #10
Every woman needs to buy a pair of these so we can identify our attackers FakeNoose Monday #11
I am not an fb 'member' dickthegrouch Monday #12

RockRaven

(19,511 posts)
1. Why do you think they are doing it?
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 02:15 PM
Monday

Zuck is a sick fuck, will do anything for a buck. And then lie about it.

If he can make money off of predators, he will, knowingly and purposely. And as noted in that article, will do so strategically not incidentally.

paleotn

(22,374 posts)
5. Who in their right mind would think THIS was a good idea?
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 03:52 PM
Monday

Perhaps a bunch of pasty tech bros who need some sunlight, normal human interactions, and an education beyond the confines of the Computer Science department.

rubbersole

(11,240 posts)
8. Bundy bifocal stalker specs.
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 04:07 PM
Monday

This is a horrible aspect of a Big Brother bad idea from the jump. Facial recognition is a privacy killer and will be abused even if only allowed to be legally used by "law enforcement".

FakeNoose

(41,872 posts)
11. Every woman needs to buy a pair of these so we can identify our attackers
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 06:15 PM
Monday

Facebook can archive the data so we'll have solid proof who attacked us, as well as when and where it happened. A lot more white men will be going to prison soon.

dickthegrouch

(4,563 posts)
12. I am not an fb 'member'
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 09:04 PM
Monday

Until I sign an agreement explicitly giving that permission, fb does not have my permission to identify me, ever!

Attorneys, please take note.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Meta Is Warned That Facia...