Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,714 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 09:40 AM Mar 4

Hegseth says U.S. sub sank Iranian warship off Sri Lanka

Source: Reuters

March 4, 2026 2:27 AM EST Updated 4 mins ago


GALLE, Sri Lanka, March 4 (Reuters) - A U.S. submarine sank an Iranian warship off the southern coast of Sri Lanka, U.S. ​Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday. Sri Lankan Foreign minister Vijitha ​Herath had earlier told parliament 180 people were on board the ⁠Iranian vessel, which he identified as the IRIS Dena.

A ship named IRINS ​Dena was listed as taking part in a naval drill held in the ​Bay of Bengal from February 18 to 25, according to the exercise's website.

INJURED IN SRI LANKAN HOSPITAL

Sri Lankan navy spokesman Commander Buddhika Sampath said bodies had been recovered from ​the sea in the area of the incident. Thirty-two people were rescued ​by the Sri Lankan navy and were being treated in hospital in the southern port ‌city ⁠of Galle.

The navy received a distress call from an Iranian ship and informed the Sri Lankan air force and both launched a search and rescue operation, he said.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/sri-lanka-rescues-30-people-board-distressed-iranian-ship-foreign-minister-says-2026-03-04/



This is breaking all over the place.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,838 posts)
5. What's the source for that? I could find only thumbnail-size pictures that would display here.
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 10:07 AM
Mar 4

This will backfire.

More rain today, I think. And good morning.

BumRushDaShow

(169,714 posts)
9. TPM
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 04:12 PM
Mar 4
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/after/1516304

And glad for the rain instead of snow - my snowdrops have started to come up and bloom (still have some plowed dirty snow mounds around but those are getting knocked down finally)!

And 'afternoon to you!

Hugin

(37,847 posts)
2. Let me be the first to say...
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 09:56 AM
Mar 4

So what.

An announcement geared to please the audience of one and the slack jawed Fox News viewers.

Hugin

(37,847 posts)
6. That much is a given...
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 10:13 AM
Mar 4

My point was that lethal measures orders of magnitude greater than a target which posed no immediate threat were unleashed for no good reason. A show. A sound bite.

This is the equivalent of blowing up a speedboat in the Caribbean.

EX500rider

(12,581 posts)
7. Letting it get close enough to do damage seems like a bad plan to me
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 03:54 PM
Mar 4
Dena was equipped with surface-to-air and anti-ship missiles, consisting of four Qader anti-ship missiles, a 76 mm Fajr-27 naval gun, and a 40 mm Fath-40 AA cannon, two 20 mm Oerlikon, two 12.7 mm heavy machine guns, and two triple torpedo launcher, 533 mm

sarisataka

(22,694 posts)
11. The conflict itself is dubious
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 04:57 PM
Mar 4

(A massive understatement)

But within the conflict I don’t see anything “illegal”. It is a military vessel heading towards a war zone.

EX500rider

(12,581 posts)
13. The same people screaming "war crime" would be screaming if the US let it get close enough to sink USN vessels also
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:08 PM
Mar 4

The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) carrier group is currently operating in the Arabian Sea, not far from Sri Lanka

sarisataka

(22,694 posts)
15. True
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:11 PM
Mar 4

There were already claims the Lincoln [/i was sunk or at least put out of action a couple days ago.

Hugin

(37,847 posts)
16. The billion dollar submarine probably launched a torpedo that cost much more than the "frigate" it sank.
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 06:25 PM
Mar 4

Nothing in the manifest of the sunken ship was even remotely dangerous to a carrier group. It was a show.

EX500rider

(12,581 posts)
17. "......... ship was even remotely dangerous to a carrier group"
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 07:12 PM
Mar 4

The Qader medium-range anti-ship cruise missiles she carried with a range of 300km and a sea-skimming profile and a 440lb warhead wouldn't exactly tickle IMO.

And close enough and her Valfajr homing torpedo's would also be dangerous, 15k range, 300k warhead.

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
18. Nothing close to that
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 04:24 PM
Mar 5

The Iranian "frigate" was nowhere near the size or complexity of what our Navy would consider a frigate (Closing on a billion dollars these days)... but it was fairly new and undoubtedly much more expensive than the torpedo (in the low single-digit millions).

EX500rider

(12,581 posts)
8. This action marks the first time a U.S. submarine has sunk an enemy vessel with a torpedo since Aug. 14, 1945
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 03:54 PM
Mar 4

when the USS Torsk sank a Japanese frigate.

EX500rider

(12,581 posts)
14. Yep, the Argentine cruiser ARA General Belgrano by the British nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror in '82
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 05:10 PM
Mar 4

(formerly the USS Phoenix, a WWII-era light cruiser)

maxsolomon

(38,711 posts)
19. There were other options to neutralize that boat.
Thu Mar 5, 2026, 06:03 PM
Mar 5

It was very far from the combat zone and the gauntlet of American Air Power it would have had to traverse to make it to the Red Sea.

RIP poor Iranian sailors. They didn't deserve to die for Trump's self-aggrandizement.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hegseth says U.S. sub san...