as well as allied forces?

Offhand, that seems like a notable admonition in itself, that the USA intends to deploy large amounts of munitions against Iran.

Has the regime properly informed Congress of their intent to engage in such an operation, what that would entail, what the goals and exit strategy are, where the FUNDS are coming from, etc?

Gradually reducing Iran's cities to rubble with no boots on the ground. That's called Terror Bombing and besides being a War Crime in every sense, we don't have anything near the supply of ammunition for such a sustained bombing campaign that would have to go on far longer and with more intensity than Gaza.

The top General's job is to stop this before it gets started.

No doubt China's defense experts are paying very close attention.

Donald has a bunker.

running around the world blowing up trivial shit. In any sort of real conflict (which Iran has the potential to become) we don't have sufficient ammunition for effective offense or defense. On top of that the USS Gerald R. Ford, ship and crew, is tired and in need of serious rest. If fighting begins the ship will be less than 100% effective.

This is the situation you have when incompetent people, lead by an ego maniac, are put in charge of serious issues and situations. Of course Trump knows better that all of the actual experts. What could possibly go wrong?

TSF needs to go. Putin has used him to hamstring our military around the world.

Will be gone/fired tomorrow

Every last one of them.

we've got "the nuclear".

Just saying.

But there is no defense against the Q-bomb.



Expect Denmark or other small country to invade the US and topple the drunken incompetent government.

NATO members are pissed off that Trump contemplated attacking Greenland; he's told European former allies that they should be the ones helping Ukraine, not the USA, because Ukraine is in the European sphere (but, strangely, Iran is even further away from the USA than Ukraine); he keeps antagonising Canada. If I were South Korea, Japan or Australia, I'd concentrate on keeping Taiwan independent from China. Why would any country formerly allied with the USA think about joining a strike with an undefined purpose?

I guess he thought the Gulf countries would do his bidding. But they're the ones that will suffer from retaliatory attacks by Iran, if they're involved in any way. They need a positive, selfish reason to offset that. You can't entice them with hand-waving about "democracy in Iran".