Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,860 posts)
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 08:11 PM Dec 15

DOE using its own land to help pair AI centers, nuclear reactors

Source: Roll Call

Posted December 15, 2025 at 11:13am


The Energy Department wants to build nuclear-powered artificial intelligence data centers on federal land using new public-private partnerships.

Co-locating advanced nuclear reactors with data centers on DOE sites is part of the Trump administration’s bid to accelerate the development of both technologies, sources say, as research efforts tease out their “symbiotic relationship.” But questions remain about how these projects could affect local communities and the actual timeline for bringing more nuclear power online.

DOE first announced its intention to use federal land for data center development and co-location in early April with a request for information to gauge industry interest. According to the RFI, the department intends to begin construction at the selected DOE sites by the end of the year, with operations beginning by the end of 2027.

The department said in July that its Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Reservation, Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant and Savannah River Site would house the co-location projects. Idaho National Laboratory, or INL, is expected to announce this month which nuclear power and AI companies will participate in the project on that site. Offers for Oak Ridge and Savannah River were due in early December, and companies hoping to work at the Paducah site have until late January to apply.

Read more: https://rollcall.com/2025/12/15/doe-using-its-own-land-to-help-pair-ai-centers-nuclear-reactors/



Instead of taking this money and building affordable housing and new schools to get kids out of dilapidated century-plus year old buildings, they do this shit... that will eventually fail, and end up with empty and abandoned data centers.

They can't just throw a nuclear plant online "instantly" to satisfy this.

Waste. Fraud. Abuse.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cheezoholic

(3,535 posts)
5. I figured they would try this when Open AI promised 20GW's of "AI Compute" by 2033. 1GW per nuke plant n/t
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 10:10 PM
Dec 15

not fooled

(6,608 posts)
7. How else do they think they are going to monitor 300+ million people?
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 11:17 PM
Dec 15

Just think of all of the computing power needed to impose and enforce the Reich on hundreds of millions of uncooperative serfs.

NNadir

(37,313 posts)
8. I absolutely support these nuclear plants at Government nuclear national laboratories.
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 11:24 PM
Dec 15

The supercomputer at Oak Ridge is not a toy to run Amazon or Facebook; it's a vital piece of equipment for solving some of the most important issues facing he world.

For the record, for full disclosure, my son is working very closely with a nuclear national lab, and I am extremely proud of the fact. Trust me, he and his colleagues are invested in trying to save the world from itself.

EarthFirst

(3,957 posts)
10. Fully fund the ACA subsidies first in perpetuity then we'll talk...
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 02:29 AM
Dec 16

Before partially funding some private enterprise venture; we ought to consider this first.

If there’s cash for nuclear energy to power the surveillance state; there’s cash for state healthcare.

NNadir

(37,313 posts)
11. On the other hand, we don't seem particularly interested in finding enough money to save the planetary atmosphere.
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 06:12 AM
Dec 16

There isn't enough money for nuclear energy, and there hasn't been, which explains why the planet is in flames.

The planet could have done a lot better if instead of squandering 5 trillion dollars on solar and wind energy in the last decade, they'd built nuclear reactors at the current Chinese rate.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOE using its own land to...