THERE WAS NO FUCKING RADIO

In that interview Tom Cotton said, “The first strike, the second strike, and the third and the fourth strike on Sept. 2 were entirely lawful and needful and they were exactly what we would expect our military commanders to do,” he said.

That may indicate a possible second boat.

As someone who was pathetic on both kayaks and canoes, this makes no sense to me.

No matter it's orientation, there's nothing on one side to keep the water out.
Besides that, it wasn't a canoe. 2 guys weren't going to right that boat!

for the racist, bigoted, inhumane nazis that have taken over that party.

... with communicating "HELP!" in any way when you're on a boat that blows up in the middle of the ocean? How do you continue a mission with a motorless piece of a boat and sunken cargo, Tom Cotton?

Or to passing ships, maybe?

How is this ludicrous nonsense of an explanation even being considered for 5 seconds? Unreal.

They murdered two survivors of a boat that had been blown to pieces. Period.

but also a desire to control the region
and plunder its resources...

... and distract from Epstein...

... and give Trump a chance to play
war president and get his rocks off
on the cruelty.

Don't forget that these people all have one thing in common: they're sadists.

Color me surprised! Did NOT know this... and still don't believe it. I assume, like talcum powder, the powder gets wet, adheres to the other powder around it, and sinks like a damn log. But, I didn't stay at Holiday Inn last night, so I could be wrong...

The solid is about 1.1 times the density of water, as a "rough estimate": https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_US_CB9496321.aspx

So as a powder, even with close packing, I would expect a bundle to be slightly less dense than water, so it might float, just. But the idea of the bundles being enough to keep the boat afloat after it had been broken in half (real buoyancy needs to be well strapped to a boat) so that someone can salvage the lot and proceed with it over a thousand miles to the USA - silly.

Not that being in possession of cocaine would have justified killing them. It's extrajudicial murder, and a crime.

There's no evidence that they had drugs, no evidence that they were headed to the U.S., the whole thing is a bunch of lies to justify Trump's evil murderous cosplaying. And even if they were, it's a crime to murder people. If Trump was so sure they were drug dealers why not track them across the ocean and catch them when they enter our waters? Because TrumpCo KNOWS they weren't drug dealers.

Decent people are getting out which leaves us with nothing but evil murderous craven cowards running our military and agencies.

Just sickening.

and it's resources for our oligarchs (and that probably includes our Russian oligarch friends, too). If trump doesn't deliver, well... it's not nice to piss off the rich, right?

But if a huge bomb falls on a boat, I'll lay odd there weren't too many sealed packets of cocaine left... if there'd been any at all in there in the first place! (I'm not convinced on this whole drug thing.)

The exact location?

Do you know if they found all the cocaine? DId they even look? I mean... like how completely thorough do you think they were?

Ok, nightmare scenario, what if one of those bricks strikes American soil and a baby eats it? It will be addicted to cocaine. Terrible...

So the precise latitude and longetude was what again?

This murder took place 1,000 miles from the U.S.

Nothing from this is going to wash up on our shores.

If a baby ate cocaine they would die. Why would a baby eat something that washed up on the beach anyway?

Someone needs to go fetch that and get rid of it responsibly before the babies eat it.

So what was those grid coordinants again?

Must be nefarious instead of trying to avoid dying. /sarcasm

SMH.

International Area Waters Marine Association?

The Wrong People Got The Death Penalty