Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,272 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:25 AM 8 hrs ago

Supreme Court to weigh Trump's firing of FTC member in test of presidential power

Source: Reuters

December 5, 2025 6:34 AM EST Updated 13 mins ago


WASHINGTON, Dec 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court next week weighs the legality of Donald Trump's firing of a Federal Trade Commission member in a major test of presidential power over agencies set up by Congress to be insulated from White House control in a case that could imperil a 90-year-old legal precedent.

The court hears arguments on Monday in the Justice Department's appeal of a lower court's decision that Trump exceeded his authority when he moved to dismiss Democratic FTC member Rebecca Slaughter in March before her term was set to expire. The case gives the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, an opportunity to overturn a New Deal-era Supreme Court precedent in a case called Humphrey's Executor v. United States that has shielded the heads of independent agencies from removal since 1935.

Such an outcome would be welcomed by proponents of a conservative legal doctrine called the "unitary executive" theory who see the president as possessing sole authority over the executive branch including the power to fire heads of independent agencies at will and pick their replacements.

Critics of this doctrine note that Congress enacted tenure-protected terms for independent agency heads to keep these offices free from political interference. Making such officials removable at the president's whim, they say, would threaten the regulatory stability relied upon by businesses, consumers and the American public.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/supreme-court-weigh-trumps-firing-ftc-member-test-presidential-power-2025-12-05/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court to weigh Trump's firing of FTC member in test of presidential power (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago OP
This is just another case of the six fascist enablers MLWR 7 hrs ago #1
They rule in his favor 90% of the time. Shadow docket: "we're not going to rule on the merits but..." CousinIT 7 hrs ago #2
THIS!! WestMichRad 7 hrs ago #3
Yeah...very predictable now. NCDem47 7 hrs ago #4
Strict Consitutionalists.. DrFunkenstein 5 hrs ago #5
An Apt Metaphor ProfessorGAC 1 hr ago #7
I still don't understand how, even the Supreme Court, Bayard 3 hrs ago #6

MLWR

(714 posts)
1. This is just another case of the six fascist enablers
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:54 AM
7 hrs ago

putting a rubber stamp on whatever Orange Orban wants to do. YAWN. Nothing new here; nothing to see. We've all seen this movie before and we all know how it ends.

CousinIT

(12,088 posts)
2. They rule in his favor 90% of the time. Shadow docket: "we're not going to rule on the merits but..."
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:57 AM
7 hrs ago

"...Trump can do whatever he wants for now."

Wash, rinse, repeat, yadda yadda yadda.

NCDem47

(3,272 posts)
4. Yeah...very predictable now.
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 09:13 AM
7 hrs ago

If there's a case to give Trump an assist--they'll take it. That's become the tell. It's his private court.

There's no doubt, the consertive majority will be flaming assholes to obstruct any future Dem President without fasttracking or rubberstamping.

DrFunkenstein

(8,889 posts)
5. Strict Consitutionalists..
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 10:53 AM
5 hrs ago

Ignore precedent and go straight to the inner aura of the founders for wisdom. Kind of like the ghost of Obi Wan and Yoda.

ProfessorGAC

(75,508 posts)
7. An Apt Metaphor
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 02:36 PM
1 hr ago

Because much of orginalism requires being able to read the minds of people dead 275 years, because in many cases those "oracles" didn't write exactly what is claimed.
The originalists rely on "knowing" what the founders were thinking when they wrote what they did, even though that is not what the put to paper.
Orginalism is a pseudointellectual fraud.

Bayard

(28,127 posts)
6. I still don't understand how, even the Supreme Court,
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 01:25 PM
3 hrs ago

Can overturn laws enacted by Congress, and in effect for many years. That doesn't seem like separation of powers on their part either.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court to weigh Tr...