A dozen former FDA leaders lambaste claims by the agency's current vaccine chief
Source: AP
Updated 8:58 PM EST, December 3, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) A dozen prior leaders of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration appointed by Republicans and Democrats alike issued a scathing denunciation of new FDA assertions casting doubt on vaccine safety.
The former officials say the agencys plans to revamp how life-saving vaccines for flu, COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases are handled outlined in an internal FDA memo last week would disadvantage the people the FDA exists to protect, including millions of Americans at high risk from serious infections.
The proposed new directives are not small adjustments or coherent policy updates. They represent a major shift in the FDAs understanding of its job, the officials, former FDA commissioners and acting commissioners, wrote Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The internal memo by FDA vaccine chief Dr. Vinay Prasad hasnt been publicly released. The document claimed without providing evidence that COVID-19 vaccines caused 10 childrens deaths. It went on to outline planned agency changes in handling those and certain other vaccines, and said that FDA staff who disagreed should resign.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/vaccines-prasad-memo-fda-rfk-jr-7cf543476ab3867b25a47463c9c5c144
bucolic_frolic
(53,546 posts)Why are we going backwards on everything?
BumRushDaShow
(164,299 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,590 posts)In a brutal week for public health, the chairman on the Senate health committee could act. So why doesnt he?
As Trump hires another ballroom architect for his White House vanity project, a question hangs overhead: Will he ever devote this much attention to governing and policymaking?
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-12-05T14:04:30.667Z
I think we know the answer. www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gops-bill-cassidy-criticizes-kennedys-vaccine-panel-but-the-senator-isnt-prepared-to-act
Without data to support their decision and defying warnings from doctors, medical associations and public health groups, a federal advisory panel stocked with loyalists to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has voted to stop recommending a life-saving vaccine to infants at birth.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will stop recommending the hepatitis B birth dose for infants specifically those born to mothers who test negative for the virus until theyre at least 2 months old, following a vote on Friday morning by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Eight panel members voted to stop the recommendation, with three dissenting.
....Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a former physician who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which has oversight of the Department of Health and Human Services, has raised related concerns. The day before the vote, the senator said online, The ACIP is totally discredited. They are not protecting children.
A day later, Cassidy published a follow-up online statement:
Link to tweet
.....The latter half of the quote, however, wasnt quite right. Cassidy, in a position of real power and influence on Capitol Hill, has plenty of other options. He could concede publicly that confirming Kennedy was a tragic mistake; he could call for Kennedys resignation; he could even schedule hearings and haul officials from HHS, CDC and the FDA to Capitol Hill to demand answers and changes.
Cassidy isnt doing any of these things. Hes instead publishing a couple of tweets, criticizing radical and dangerous public health moves in the mildest of ways.
I cant ready the senators mind. Maybe hes worried about the GOP primary challenge hes facing in Louisiana next year? Maybe hes letting partisan considerations hold him back? Maybe hes under pressure from Republican leaders not to do anything more consequential?
Whatever his motivation, Cassidy cant escape responsibility for the damage Kennedy and his cohorts are doing to the nations public health, and while he could take meaningful actions in response, the senator is choosing not to, seemingly indifferent to the consequences of his inaction.