That should nullify the repukes redistricting as well.

For both parties! THIS court is for one party, the REPUBLICONS!

That's because they were trying to do their job. Not really sure WTF Reagan was doing though.

Okay for Texas but not for California?

How does the orange obscenity have standing?

At least California put the vote to the citizens.

here in texas I didn't get a chance to vote on shit.

That's the basis of the California lawsuit.

Every two years you get a chance to vote on mountains of shit. Repubs on your ballots qualify.

(With apologies to shit everywhere.)

Where does it say anything about redistricting in the Constitution?

They're claiming Prop 50 is race-based and a constitutional (federal) violation - an argument with as many holes as any other court filing by the rapist.
So I guess we both learned something new.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1417291/dl?inline=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

Suing to make one state stop what you have already asked another state to do.

since "Hispanic" isn't a "race" but a language group.

But as I have posted many times, everything they do is their faux outrage over "race" due to their imposition of a system of racism/white supremacy and ethnic cleansing.

He is a perfect example of why so many people push for "tort reform". He is a crooked motherfucker and has no ethics or morals. That is why it is so astonishing that the White Bible thumpers seem to worship him. Tells me a lot about them and their religion.

With approval of the Legislature and the Governor.

California state law does not. That's why Newsom developed a citizen's initiative to temporarily suspend that restriction. I suspect the Trump administration will contend that the initiative was illegal or invalid.

And it does allow for gerrymandering between censuses but requires approval from the citizens, thus Prop. 50.

Texas only required Legislative approval and the Governor's signature.

I'm not sure how the DOJ can prevail.

Republicans. That way we can worship His Highness King Donald the Perverted and not have to shower every time we say his name.










(Of course this is sarcasm, if it's needed.)

are they

so they can't argue it violates the CA constitution which prevents mid-census redistricting. I mean they can try to argue it but it would fail because the citizens voted it in and in CA the citizens are allowed to ammend the constitution.

What they are arguing is that it is racially biased redistricting which means that they are trying to give SCOTUS a reason to rule in favor of Lousiana in their redistricting battle that was ordered to comply with the Voting Rights Act. In that case they are claiming the redemy itself violates the law against racial redistricting. The difference is that in Lousiana's case the remedy is actually intended to be racially biased and in CA's case it's not and instead intended to be politically biased. The thing is if you look at the new map it's going to be very hard to prove that, CA is approximately 39% Latino and many of the new districts that are tilted to Dems have a % of Latino population under 39% and the ones that are over were alredy Dem districts.

I seriously doubt a group as smart and Newsom's is going to do something as reckless and obvious as what Texas did. They thought this through and proving racial biased is going to be incredibly difficult.

and hopes a judge will find him in favor, not this time BUCKO your ass has nothing to gain from this legal maneuver.

Attorney General Pam Bondi cast California’s plan as a “brazen power grab that tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process.”
I am out of words for her brazen bullshit!

Do they really want all of this under oath, and on the record? (Not that they would honor such a thing. Most of them don't even understand what that is.)

Do they want their Dear Leader to take the stand, because they could certainly call for him!

Time for some popcorn.