Trump Appears Unaware Supreme Court Ruled 9-0 Against Him: 'That's Not What My People Told Me'
Source: MEDIAite
Apr 25th, 2025, 10:27 am
President Donald Trump claims his lawyers have told him that the Supreme Court’s ruling on Kilmar Abrego Garcia does not mean he needs to bring back the man accidentally deported to an El Salvador megaprison. In an interview with TIME, the president was asked about the Supreme Court’s 9-0 order telling the administration to effectuate Garcia’s return.
The administration has maintained that Garcia is an MS-13 gang member despite no prior convictions and their admission that he was sent to El Salvador by mistake. Asked if he’s “disobeying” the Supreme Court, Trump said, “That’s not what my people told me — they didn’t say it was, they said it was — the nine to nothing was entirely different.”
The ruling orders the government to “facilitate and effectuate the return of [Abrego Garcia] to the United States by no later than 11:59 PM on Monday, April 7.”
“I leave that to my lawyers,” Trump said when asked if he is actively facilitating Garcia’s return. “I give them no instructions. They feel that the order said something very much different from what you’re saying. But I leave that to my lawyers. If they want — and that would be Attorney General of the United States and the people that represent the country. I don’t make that decision.”
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/news/thats-not-what-my-people-told-me-trump-defends-defying-9-0-supreme-court-ruling-ordering-kilmar-garcia-returned/

Snarkoleptic
(6,146 posts)n/t
bluestarone
(19,847 posts)
MLWR
(357 posts)In the first case before them, "The Supreme Court has unanimously ordered the Trump administration to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody so that he can have a hearing." --The Hill
In the second case before them, Thomas and Alito dissented.
bluestarone
(19,847 posts)That's my opinion only though. (if the real truth was known)
onenote
(45,331 posts)If they didn't state on the record that they dissent, then the default is that they didn't dissent.
bluestarone
(19,847 posts)In my eyes NO WAY these TWO in their minds didn't DISSENT.
unblock
(55,219 posts)Seems like a definition of tyranny, if not also a few other mental illnesses....
Irish_Dem
(71,025 posts)And the courts are supposed to look the other way.
Martin68
(25,945 posts)EYESORE 9001
(28,417 posts)See what they tell the apricot hellbeast then
Doodley
(11,054 posts)I've got people working on that. The lawyers are dealing with that. Nobody told me that. I've got two guys working on that. We are working on that right now. We will have something tremendous in two months. It's a scratched record of BS.
Amaryllis
(10,468 posts)republianmushroom
(20,233 posts)pandr32
(13,081 posts)
Initech
(105,253 posts)Stephen Miller and Alex Jones are very likely suspects.
Amaryllis
(10,468 posts)their favor. and he said it more than once.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/stephen-miller-egregiously-misrepresented-a-supreme-court-order-while-trump-nodded-along/ar-AA1CYthz
If you find a recording of the meeting you will hear it.
Initech
(105,253 posts)
chowder66
(10,763 posts)But he personally doesn't fire anyone so there's that.
FakeNoose
(37,600 posts)He lies and he keeps on lying, and he never stops. He believes that if enough people hear his lies, and if they hear it often enough, they'll start believing him.
Then "poof" ... it's no longer a lie .. it's the "new truth."
onenote
(45,331 posts)In suggests that the 9-0 Supreme Court ruling ordered the government to "facilitate and effectuate the return of [Abrego Garcia] to the United States by no later than 11:59 PM on Monday, April 7.” But that's what the district court originally ordered. That deadline initially was stayed by the Supreme Court, which then ruled 9-0 that the district court should clarify its order, stating as follows:
... the deadline in the challenged order is no longer effective. The rest of the District Court’s order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can con- cerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps."
I have no doubt that Trump has been misinformed about what the Court ruled, or is incapable of understanding it. But that doesn't excuse Mediaite misrepresenting the Court's decision.
Buddyzbuddy
(1,015 posts)I'm powerless so I can't be in trouble. This from the guy that told his lawyers what to say and write during the trial that made him a FELON. BTW, again, "I leave that to my lawyers"? Does he mean the United States Of America's Justice Dept.? Or, the Lawyers that lost the State of New York's criminal case against him that resulted in him being found guilty of felony charges and becoming a FELON.
Safe as Milk
(118 posts)The proper judicial ruling, IMO, would be to call the lawyers before the bench and strip them of their license to practice. Donny's word can be taken as fact in this regard. Let the attorneys find jobs at Wal-Mart.
twodogsbarking
(13,991 posts)That's not, well, loyal.
Karasu
(1,346 posts)Only the best people, don't you know.
They can't even do fascism properly.
twodogsbarking
(13,991 posts)Hieronymus Phact
(613 posts)Reportedly, that's all he watches.
Martin Eden
(14,430 posts)THEY are not immune from arrest and indictment.