Trump doesn't only want to end DEI. He's also voiding a Civil Rights-era anti-discrimination rule.
Source: CBS News
Updated on: January 25, 2025 / 4:20 PM EST
Among the flurry of executive orders since his Jan. 20 inauguration, President Donald Trump has taken aim at rooting out diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs within the federal government. But his efforts go beyond DEI, with one recent order rescinding a Civil Rights-era rule that has helped protect millions of workers from discrimination.
Mr. Trump's Jan. 21 order "Ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit-based opportunity" revokes the Equal Employment Opportunity rule signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is still law today had a loophole that excluded federal employees. Johnson signed the Equal Employment Opportunity rule to close the loophole, and those protections were signed into law in 1972.
That rule bars federal contractors, who today employ 3.7 million people, from discriminating against job applicants or workers on the basis of race, gender, religion and other protected characteristics. It also gave the Labor Department the authority to take action against discrimination. Mr. Trump's order does not invalidate the law, and private and federal employees are still protected from discrimination as laid out under the Civil Rights Act. But his order does strike down the 1965 rule prohibiting contractors that do business with the government from taking race, gender and the other protected criteria into account.
More broadly, revoking the 60-year-old Equal Employment Opportunity order eliminates a bedrock of civil rights protection for American workers, signaling an effort to target workplace issues that go beyond DEI, labor experts say. While DEI is shorthand for programs that encourage equality in the workplace for women, minorities and other groups, the Equal Employment Opportunity rule prohibited federal contractors from engaging in acts of discrimination, such as refusing to hire someone due to their race or paying an employee less because of their gender.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-equal-employment-opportunity-revoke-1965-dei-what-it-means/
Native
(6,819 posts)BumRushDaShow
(146,595 posts)along with Title IX (from the Education Amendments of 1972), in order to "put women and minorities BACK in their place".
4catsmom
(448 posts)is white folks only. Oops, I meant white males only
NotHardly
(1,555 posts)pandr32
(12,452 posts)No more 'entitlement' or preference for skin color.
EarthFirst
(3,368 posts)I want to see Shitler sit down on live television and have him complete the 2024/25 SAT exam with the minimum entry average for an ivy league admissions (1460)
SARose
(1,105 posts)Been pissing off republicans since the 60s. Thats why the Dixiecrats left the Democratic Party AND why Republicans took up the antiabortion cause.
Lyndon B. Johnson
If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.
Still true to this day but need to add Mexicans, Asians, LGBTQ.
BumRushDaShow
(146,595 posts)was him to Bill Moyers back then.
OldBaldy1701E
(7,040 posts)Lyndon B. Johnson (with an update from the bald one)
If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man everyone else, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.
SARose
(1,105 posts)LBJ never meant everybody else. He was specifically speaking about African Americans.
Everybody else was not the reason the Dixiecrats left the Democratic Party. Everybody else was not and is not the reason Johnson would not support segregated private schools.
Racism pure and simple was the reason. A trip to the LBJ ranch in Stonewall, Tx is in order.
OldBaldy1701E
(7,040 posts)I was not trying to change what he said. I was trying to show that, nowadays, that phrase applies to anyone they can vilify.
So, excuse me for not making that clear.
LymphocyteLover
(7,212 posts)FakeNoose
(36,460 posts)Even if he had the power to do that, it would never make him qualified to be President.
Obama, Hillary and Kamala are better than Chump in every way imaginable.