Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(39,260 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 09:06 PM Thursday

Key Republican senators to vote against Pete Hegseth for US defense secretary

Source: The Guardian U.S.

Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska announced that they would oppose the nomination of Pete Hegseth to become the next US secretary of defense, making them the first two Republican lawmakers to publicly reject one of Donald Trump’s cabinet picks and raising fresh doubts about the controversial nominee’s chances of confirmation...

Shortly after Murkowski made her announcement, Collins joined her in opposing a procedural motion to advance Hegseth’s nomination to a final Senate vote and released her own statement detailing her reservations about the cabinet pick.

Given Republicans’ 53-47 advantage in the Senate, Hegseth can only afford to lose three of their votes, assuming every Democratic senator opposes his nomination. Hegseth overcame a procedural hurdle in the Senate on Thursday afternoon, with 51 Republicans voting to advance his nomination, but it remains unclear whether he will have the support necessary to be confirmed.

The Senate is expected to hold the final vote on Hegseth’s nomination on Friday night.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/23/lisa-murkowski-pete-hegseth-nomination



Keeping fingers crossed.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Key Republican senators to vote against Pete Hegseth for US defense secretary (Original Post) ancianita Thursday OP
Those two were obvious No's, but two more are still needed Polybius Thursday #1
These votes are window dressing; lipstick on a pig....Here's how it works: Sogo Thursday #2
The FBI has just turned over an unprecedented third background briefing. ancianita Thursday #3
They don't care. They don't understand how government works so they want travelingthrulife Friday #15
And they knew that when they declined to vote for him - they know how others will vote. walkingman Thursday #7
Where did you hear that? Gnomad Friday #16
He was never going to be confirmed. truthisfreedom Thursday #4
I hopehope you're right. ancianita Thursday #5
Yes IbogaProject Friday #8
Every one of them should vote against him. Shame on them! Sparky 1 Thursday #6
Susan Collins nwliberalkiwi Friday #9
More like a two headed snake with a head at each end and shit comes out of both mouths. cstanleytech Friday #11
Raise your hand if you believe it's just Republican fake show votes!!! cstanleytech Friday #10
I do LeftInTX Friday #13
Signifying absolutely nothing quakerboy Friday #12
Bingo!! cstanleytech Friday #14

Polybius

(18,930 posts)
1. Those two were obvious No's, but two more are still needed
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:13 PM
Thursday

Who are the next most possible to switch?

Sogo

(5,928 posts)
2. These votes are window dressing; lipstick on a pig....Here's how it works:
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:14 PM
Thursday

They have gotten the OK to vote their conscience because it will pass without their votes.

That is all.

ancianita

(39,260 posts)
3. The FBI has just turned over an unprecedented third background briefing.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:19 PM
Thursday

If R Senators can't see that this guy can't pass FBI background checks out of fear of the felon, then they care as little about our national security as the felon does.

Any military attacks on the U.S. or its bases will be on all their heads. God help us.

walkingman

(8,749 posts)
7. And they knew that when they declined to vote for him - they know how others will vote.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 11:42 PM
Thursday

It's all smoke and mirrors and is common practice in Congress.

truthisfreedom

(23,344 posts)
4. He was never going to be confirmed.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:20 PM
Thursday

This is just a spectacle to take up the news cycles for a couple of weeks while l’orange does horrifying things behind the scenes. Same old same old.

ancianita

(39,260 posts)
5. I hopehope you're right.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:30 PM
Thursday
Those R Senators who confirmed Lloyd Austin ought to get calls from him; he's good at changing minds.

IbogaProject

(3,978 posts)
8. Yes
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 12:42 AM
Friday

Even with all the baggage he is also especially unqualified, even for a President Turd nominee.

nwliberalkiwi

(381 posts)
9. Susan Collins
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 01:51 AM
Friday

I would not trust her---bet she votes to confirm. She has a long history of flip flopping.

quakerboy

(14,237 posts)
12. Signifying absolutely nothing
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 03:41 AM
Friday

Their votes dont matter, so are released to act moderate. If the senate was 51/49, they would be making obfuscations and voting for him.

All this means is that republicans have so much power they can pretend to be reasonable and it doesnt effect the outcome.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Key Republican senators t...