Mississippi lawmaker introduces 'Contraception Begins at Erection Act'
Source: NBC News
Jan. 23, 2025, 10:42 AM EST
Mississippi state Sen. Bradford Blackmon, a Democrat, introduced a bill this week that would seemingly ban men from masturbating or engaging in other sexual acts when they have no "intent to fertilize an embryo." The bill, titled the "Contraception Begins at Erection Act," would make it unlawful for "a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo." It includes exceptions for sperm donation and using contraception to prevent fertilization.
The bill, introduced Monday, imposes fines of $1,000 for a first offense, $5,000 for a second offense and $10,000 for any subsequent offenses. The bill is unlikely to pass the GOP-led state Legislature, but if it does and is signed into law by Gov. Tate Reeves, a Republican, it would go into effect in July.
Blackmon, a first-term senator representing a district north of Jackson, the capital, did not immediately respond to NBC News' requests for comment. In a statement to WLBT News, an NBC television affiliate in Jackson, Blackmon referred to the high number of state legislative bills introduced in recent years that target women's access to reproductive health care, specifically abortion and contraception.
"All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the womans role when men are fifty percent of the equation," he wrote. "This bill highlights that fact and brings the mans role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I cant say that bothers me."
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mississippi-lawmaker-introduces-contraception-begins-erection-act-rcna188938
Joinfortmill
(16,985 posts)Response to Joinfortmill (Reply #1)
Volaris This message was self-deleted by its author.
Joinfortmill
(16,985 posts)Volaris
(10,718 posts)cstanleytech
(27,292 posts)🤣
jls4561
(1,873 posts)Maybe hell appoint a new Congressional Committee to help.
reACTIONary
(6,239 posts)Chalco
(1,383 posts)Show them what Aholes they are.
stillcool
(32,966 posts)I'd kind of like a board game based on this.
Stpaoulboy
(17 posts)Maybe they wouldn't need so much money from blue states.
Stpaoulboy
(17 posts)I could go on all day, literally.
DAngelo136
(326 posts)Would that be enforced? I can just see it now...
BonnieJW
(2,699 posts)They should have a special branch of the police force. The Jerk Offs. A special insignia is mandatory.
Is this the most pressing issue these jokers could come up with? Why don't they just start dressing like pilgrims?
republianmushroom
(18,608 posts)All of them are so honorable.
Johnson aide advised against Hutchinson subpoena over concerns about lawmakers' 'sexual texts'
OldBaldy1701E
(6,965 posts)I remember seeing it in the theater. This scene had everyone on the floor.
gopiscrap
(24,280 posts)what movie is it from?
underpants
(188,059 posts)I thought thats where this was going.
4catsmom
(411 posts)of women's rights. Taking away their main hobby is going to be painful
malthaussen
(17,841 posts)Maybe if our politicians did not think it was cool to abuse the legislative process to score points we'd have better legislatures, though I doubt it.
Oh, yeah, so clever, like a middle-schooler retorting "and so are you" to everything said.
Does anybody seriously believe that pointing out the hypocrisy and double-standard of legislating women's bodies is going to make one percent of difference to the ones who create such legislation, or the ones who support them? Yeah, verily, the scales are going to drop from their eyes and they will utter a heartfelt "mea culpa" just because some wise guy floats a bill designed to fail? What is the point of the exercise?
I suppose it is better to make some symbolic offering than trying to come up with something constructive? Or maybe, you know, lacking the imagination to do the latter, one does the former because after all, one's re-election is coming up sooner or later.
-- Mal
reACTIONary
(6,239 posts).... right on the nose "Populist". Populism is a political style that acts out, transgresses, and derides those who are stuffy, serious elitists and snobs. Sort of the Marx brothers in the political realm. Or maybe better, professional wrestling in the political realm.
TSF (a populist way of referring to the current occupant of the people's house) is a (right wing) populist. He has the loyalty and support of the uneducated, low information, "pro wrestling" segments of the population because he is entertaining in a way that triggers and owns the elites. He's one of the guys, for some definition of "the guys".
Populism is not an ideology, and does not have to be (and often has not been) a right wing stance. It can lean left liberal populist. It can draw the segment of voters who are swayed by it away from the right. It can mock and disempower the oligarchy, the patriarchy, and Comstockery.
In this light, the bill that was introduced is NOT targeted towards eliciting a "mea culpa" from the prudes, puritans, and bluenose prigs on the right that are attempting to legislate women's bodies. It is targeted towards making fun of them in a crass way that will appeal to the populist segment and draw them away from TSF's cult. While we might not all feel comfortable with this tactic, we probably need to have some of those who are practitioners on our side.
The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation by Benjamin Moffitt
LearnedHand
(4,357 posts)And is a proud example of political satire in that tradition. We need MUCH MORE of this. Remember, Tim Walz uncovered their Achilles tendon: They HATE being laughed at.
The Roux Comes First
(1,613 posts)So bring it on, please!!
malthaussen
(17,841 posts)Is the "tiny minority with any self-awareness" greater or lesser, in your opinion, than the majority who are irony-challenged and will probably see this as a genuine proposal? Is it greater or lesser, in your opinion, than the percentage who will actually applaud it and think it is a good idea?
I think Dean Swift might find himself somewhat befuddled (well, actually not, given what kind of a person Dean Swift was) to find that his satire is taken as a sober proposal rather than a modest one. This is, IMO, one of the problems we have on the dissenting side of the aisle. Tactics which we think are brilliant and witty fall into an empty echo chamber. It may be good for the ego, but as to being productive of results, it's a null program. IMO, of course.
Ultimately, to answer Joseph Welch's question, no, they have no shame and no sense of decency. And any such satire as this bill is absolutely reliant on them having some shred of shame and decency.
-- Mal
paleotn
(19,816 posts)Repukes are the Gawd party, are they not?
rambler_american
(864 posts)wet dreams?
Asking for a friend, obviously.
momta
(4,120 posts)If those idiots want to criminalize destroying a "potential" human, then they need to be charged for every sperm they squirt that doesn't have a chance at fertilizing an egg.
erronis
(17,520 posts)PortTack
(35,111 posts)bonniebgood
(953 posts)patphil
(7,283 posts)I'm surprised he didn't say that contraception begins when a prepubescent boy has his first wet dream.
This guy's a dildo, no doubt.
Note: a dildo is a mindless fucker.
Layzeebeaver
(1,899 posts)I don't think he's a nut.
(Damn I did it again!)
róisín_dubh
(11,942 posts)Might want to have another go at it and then edit or delete your post.
OhioBack2Blue
(44 posts)Limp dick? - No more Viagra or Cialis, no more testosterone, you'll just have to live that way
Crushed a nut / blown scrotum? - No more reconstructive surgery, you'll just have to live that way.
Ejaculation with no intent to fertilize including nocturnal emission = major civil penalties
Layzeebeaver
(1,899 posts)you beat me to it.
(See wahr I did there?)
keroro gunsou
(2,241 posts)every sperm is sacred
every sperm is great
if just one is wasted
god will get irate.
TheRickles
(2,555 posts)Layzeebeaver
(1,899 posts)Theoretically, one could incur a fine because of an unplanned "sexy dream".
I like where this is going.
róisín_dubh
(11,942 posts)A_Steel_Magnolia
(24 posts)See what I did there? I've been bitchin' for decades that women have gotten a bad rap with the prissy way we approach sexuality in this country, socialogically speaking.
Think about it!
A woman "gets" pregnant - a passive voice for an active (series of?) event(s).
Only a woman can be charged for the "crime" of abortion or die because a pregnancy goes wrong.
Men can have sex prior to, and even outside of marriage, but not women.
(Feel free to add to the list.)
Where does that leave heterosexual men of all ages? Masterbating, of course, or having sex with each other...and the sexual divide becomes a chasm. The human race is in a world of hurt.
Gotta say, I like this new Mississippi state rep's attitude!