Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,379 posts)
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 12:48 PM Monday

Judge clears the way for release of special counsel Smith's report on Trump's 2020 election case

Last edited Mon Jan 13, 2025, 02:03 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: AP

Updated 1:35 PM EST, January 13, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department can publicly release special counsel Jack Smith’s investigative report on President-elect Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case, a federal judge said Monday — the latest ruling in a court dispute over the highly anticipated document days before Trump is set to take office again.

But a temporary injunction barring the immediate release of the report remains in effect until Tuesday, and it’s unlikely U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s order will be the last word on the matter. Defense lawyers may seek to challenge it all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump, had earlier temporarily blocked the department from releasing the entire report on Smith’s investigations into Trump that led to two separate criminal cases. Cannon’s latest order on Monday cleared the way for the release of the volume detailing Smith’s case that accused Trump, a Republican, of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, a Democrat.

She set a hearing for Friday on whether the department can release to lawmakers the volume on the case that accused Trump of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate after he left the White House in 2021. The department has said it will not publicly disclose that volume as long as criminal proceedings against two of Trump’s co-defendants remain pending.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-special-counsel-aileen-cannon-d7be86dad89227f12a6f5aac3433b202



Article updated.

Original article/headline -

Judge clears the way for release of special counsel Smith's report on Trump's Jan. 6 case

Updated 12:38 PM EST, January 13, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge said Monday that the Justice Department can release special counsel Jack Smith’s investigative report on President-elect Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump, is latest back and forth in a court dispute over the report from the special counsel who prosecuted Trump in two cases the Justice Department abandoned in November.


Cannon had earlier temporarily blocked the department from releasing the report. Cannon’s latest order on Monday cleared the way for the release of the volume on Trump’s 2020 election interference case.

She set a hearing for Friday on whether the department can release to lawmakers the volume on Trump’s classified documents case. The department has said it will not publicly disclose that volume as long as criminal proceedings against two of Trump’s co-defendants remain pending.



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge clears the way for release of special counsel Smith's report on Trump's 2020 election case (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Monday OP
Hmmm...is there a catch? Fiendish Thingy Monday #1
We won't see the report. Think. Again. Monday #6
The MAL report is the damaging one gab13by13 Monday #2
Fixed it for ya... Think. Again. Monday #5
It also has 2 defendants who DOJ is apparently still seeking to try and much of the info is "classified" BumRushDaShow Monday #9
You actually believe that gab13by13 Monday #11
They are "disposable people" BumRushDaShow Monday #14
The report Traildogbob Monday #3
cannon is just showboating... Think. Again. Monday #4
Delay until Friday. DELAY DELAY DELAY until he is sworn in and can toss the whole report into the trash can. usaf-vet Monday #7
Funny to see Cannon reverse herself. ificandream Monday #8
I wonder where she's feeling the heat from? dickthegrouch Monday #10
This is what frosts my balls gab13by13 Monday #12
You are INTENTIONALLY leaving out the NARA timeline associated with 45 BumRushDaShow Monday #15
Sickening. I can't believe the report on the yorkster Monday #13
So the "excuse" used to not release part 2 now is that moniss Monday #16
So Judge Cannon will rule on Friday... WestMichRad Monday #17

Fiendish Thingy

(19,023 posts)
1. Hmmm...is there a catch?
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 12:56 PM
Monday

Will Trump appeal to the 11th, and then SCOTUS, or will we actually get to see Smith’s J6 report when the injunction expires at midnight tonight?

I suppose DOJ/SDFL could move to dismiss charges against the minions at Friday’s hearing, for a chance to release the docs report before next Monday…

gab13by13

(25,683 posts)
2. The MAL report is the damaging one
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:00 PM
Monday

and it will never be released.

Judge Cannon sure outsmarted Smith and Garland.

BumRushDaShow

(145,379 posts)
9. It also has 2 defendants who DOJ is apparently still seeking to try and much of the info is "classified"
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:25 PM
Monday

so there is no "outsmart".

If you all keep believing that the Executive Branch is somehow the "Unitary Executive Branch" with SUPERIOR authority OVER the "Judicial Branch" and/or the "Legislative Branch" - a view that John Yoo pushed - then there are some Civics 101 classes that are awaiting your attendance.

gab13by13

(25,683 posts)
11. You actually believe that
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:32 PM
Monday

Nauta and DeOliveira will go to trial under Pam Bondi as AG?

Garland should have dropped the charges against them months ago and then Cannon wouldn't have any grounds for an appeal. I guess Garland figured that Trump would allow his Diet Coke gofer to go to trial?

BumRushDaShow

(145,379 posts)
14. They are "disposable people"
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 02:10 PM
Monday

45 doesn't give a shit about them. They can take the fall unless he finds it in his hollowed-out heart to pardon them (he certainly left Ghouliani hanging - not even bothering to pardon him for any ongoing or "future" infractions - but he sure did pardon Manafort and Bannon).

And again - you need to stop fixating on figure-heads that will be replaced by new figure-heads.

Traildogbob

(10,312 posts)
3. The report
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:03 PM
Monday

Needs fully released before the goons are released back into the streets as trumps personal militia.

Think. Again.

(19,908 posts)
4. cannon is just showboating...
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:07 PM
Monday

...she knows she never had authority to place the injunction in the first place and she knows garland has no intention of releasing the report now.

usaf-vet

(7,113 posts)
7. Delay until Friday. DELAY DELAY DELAY until he is sworn in and can toss the whole report into the trash can.
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:12 PM
Monday

We can't let HER get away with this. Who is laying out her "3D chess moves"? It certainly is her alone.

If she gets this delay until Friday. Two things will likely happen.
1. the SCOTUS will intervene if necessary to further delay it UNTIL
2. Trump will have been sworn in and KILL the entire report.


BIDEN YOU HAVE IMMUNITY RELEASE THE ENTIRE REPORT. One more act to help save democracy.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19900198

dickthegrouch

(3,687 posts)
10. I wonder where she's feeling the heat from?
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:25 PM
Monday

Unless as TFG asserted earlier “the fix is already in “.

gab13by13

(25,683 posts)
12. This is what frosts my balls
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:43 PM
Monday

How differently Trump and President Biden were treated by Garland.

Nov. 4, 2022 National Archives notified Garland that there were classified documents at a Biden property.

5 fucking days later the FBI began investigating.

2 1/2 months later, from Nov. 4th, Garland appointed a Trump crony, Hur as special counsel to investigate Joe. Garland gave the Biden White House no advance notice it was appointing Hur.

3 months later, from Nov. 4th the FBI searched Biden's home.

I year later, from Nov. 4th. President Biden agreed to testify to SC Hur, which he did for 2 days.

13 months later, from Nov. 4th, Hur gave his report to Garland.

3 days later Garland released the Hur report to the public, unredacted.

We will never get to see the Trump stolen document report because Garland did not treat Trump the same way he treated President Biden.

Justice delayed is justice denied. Time Matters.

BumRushDaShow

(145,379 posts)
15. You are INTENTIONALLY leaving out the NARA timeline associated with 45
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 03:01 PM
Monday
How differently Trump and President Biden were treated by Garland.

Nov. 4, 2022 National Archives notified Garland that there were classified documents at a Biden property.

5 fucking days later the FBI began investigating.


When you are MISSING information, then your premise is way off.

Here is the timeline -

A timeline of the investigation into Trump’s Mar-a-Lago docs

By JILL COLVIN and LINDSAY WHITEHURST
Published 10:25 PM EST, August 31, 2022

(snip)

A timeline of notable developments:

JAN. 20, 2021

Then-President Donald Trump left the White House for Florida ahead of President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration. According to the General Services Administration, members of Trump’s transition team were responsible for packing items into boxes, putting boxes on pallets and shrink-wrapping those pallets so they could be transported. Prior to shipping, GSA said it “required the outgoing transition team to certify in writing that the items being shipped were required to wind down the Office of the Former President and would be utilized as the Office transitioned to its new location in Florida.” GSA did not examine the contents of the boxes and “had no knowledge of the contents prior to shipping,” according to an agency spokesperson. GSA was also not responsible for the former president’s personal belongings, which were transported by a private moving company. Under the Presidential Records Act, presidential records are considered federal property — not private — and are supposed to be turned over to the National Archives and Records Administration. Multiple federal laws govern the handling of classified and sensitive government documents, including statutes that make it a crime to remove such material and retain it at an unauthorized location.

MAY 2021

After NARA realized that documents from Trump’s presidency seemed to be missing from the material that it received as he left office, the agency requested the records from Trump on or about May 6, 2021, according to a heavily redacted affidavit made public last week.

DECEMBER 2021:

NARA “continued to make requests” for records it believed to be missing for several months, according to the affidavit. Around late December 2021, a Trump representative informed the agency that an additional 12 boxes of records that should have been turned over had been found at the former president’s Mar-a-Lago club and residence and were ready to be retrieved.

JAN. 18, 2022

NARA received 15 boxes of presidential records that had been stored at Mar-a-Lago — 14 of which, it would later be revealed, contained classified documents. The documents were found mixed in with an assortment of other material, including newspapers, magazines, photos and personal correspondence. In total, the boxes were found to contain 184 documents with classified markings, including 67 marked confidential, 92 secret and 25 top secret. Agents who inspected the boxes also found special markings suggesting they included information from highly sensitive human sources or the collection of electronic “signals” authorized by a court under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

FEB. 9, 2022

The special agent in charge of NARA’s Office of the Inspector General sent a referral to the Justice Department via email after a preliminary review of the boxes revealed numerous classified documents.

(snip)


Here is another link showing the timeline with additional dates -

Timeline: The government's efforts to get sensitive documents back from Trump's Mar-a-Lago

By Robert Legare, Arden Farhi, Melissa Quinn

June 9, 2023 / 6:17 PM EDT / CBS News

(snip)

Feb. 9: The Archives' Office of the Inspector General sends a referral to the Justice Department requesting it investigate Trump's handling of records. The referral notes a preliminary review of the 15 boxes taken from Mar-a-Lago indicated they contained newspapers, printed news articles, photos, notes, presidential correspondence and "a lot of classified records." "Of most significant concern was that highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified," the referral stated.

Feb. 18: David Ferriero, then-archivist of the United States, sends a letter to House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney informing her some of the boxes retrieved by the Archives in mid-January contained items marked as classified national security information, and asked Trump's representatives to continue searching for any additional presidential records that had not been transferred to the Archives. Ferriero tells Maloney that because the Archives identified classified information in the boxes, its staff had been in communication with the Justice Department.

April 11: The White House Counsel's Office formally transmits a request that the Archives provide the FBI access to the 15 boxes retrieved from Mar–a-Lago for its review.

April 12: The Archives says it communicated with Trump's "authorized representative" about the 15 boxes of seized records and told his attorney Evan Corcoran about the Justice Department's "urgency" in needing access to them. The agency also advises Trump's counsel it intended to provide the FBI with the documents the next week. Corcoran later requests the Archives delay the disclosure to the FBI to April 29.

(snip)


And a 3rd timeline source (with some additional info/timeframes not in the other timelines) -

Timeline: The special counsel inquiry into Trump’s handling of classified documents

By Marshall Cohen, Holmes Lybrand and Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN
Updated 7:37 PM EDT, Thu July 27, 2023

(snip)

Here’s a timeline of the important developments in the blockbuster investigation.

(snip)

July 2021

In a taped conversation, Trump acknowledges that he still has a classified Pentagon document about a possible attack against Iran, according to CNN reporting. The recording, which was made at Trump’s golf club in New Jersey, indicates that Trump understood that he retained classified material after leaving the White House. The special counsel later obtained this audiotape, a key piece of evidence in his inquiry.

(snip)

February 9, 2022

NARA asks the Justice Department to investigate Trump’s handling of White House records and whether he violated the Presidential Records Act and other laws related to classified information. The Presidential Records Act requires all records created by a sitting president to be turned over to the National Archives at the end of their administration.

February 18, 2022

NARA informs the Justice Department that some of the documents retrieved from Mar-a-Lago included classified material. NARA also tells the department that, despite being warned it was illegal, Trump occasionally tore up government documents while he was president.

April and May 2022

On April 7, NARA publicly acknowledges for the first time that the Justice Department is involved, and news outlets report that prosecutors have launched a criminal probe into Trump’s mishandling of classified documents. Around this time, FBI agents quietly interview Trump aides at Mar-a-Lago about the handling of presidential records as part of their widening investigation.

(snip)

yorkster

(2,586 posts)
13. Sickening. I can't believe the report on the
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 02:02 PM
Monday

classified docs. will not be released. The traitor skates again.
No one with spine enough to release both reports? With proper redactions, of course.

As for the two co-defendants, that case will be dropped as soon as the new regime takes over.

moniss

(6,258 posts)
16. So the "excuse" used to not release part 2 now is that
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 04:14 PM
Monday

criminal charges are still being pursued against the two underlings. Everybody knows those will be dropped immediately when Donald Crumb takes office. So why not file now to withdraw the charges, since we all know they are going nowhere, and release the report? Garland can do this in 2 short documents. I actually doubt that the Smith Report Part 2 is going to have details about what is in the classified documents found because none of that info is necessary for charging/proving obstruction etc. You only need the existence of the folder and document to show evidence. What the document says is neither here nor there as to whether it was in his possession, whether he hid it and whether he lied about it.

Obviously we could and should get Part 2 to see all of the obstruction efforts.

WestMichRad

(1,945 posts)
17. So Judge Cannon will rule on Friday...
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 06:38 PM
Monday

… that the DOJ can release the report, defense will appeal to SCOTUS, who will agree to an expedited hearing of the case…

… in March. Before then of course the DOJ under TSF/Bondi/whatever syncophant attorney general will withdraw the request to release it, sweeping the whole thing under the rug. Bastards all, including the cooperative “justices” and loose cannons.

May someone please leak it (part 1, the unclassified info).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge clears the way for ...