Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,377 posts)
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:18 PM Jan 8

Companies decline to drill in Alaska wildlife refuge

Source: The Hill

01/08/25 11:28 AM ET


No oil or gas company sought to drill in a contentious wildlife refuge in Alaska, the Interior Department announced Wednesday. As required by a 2017 law, the Biden administration offered the private sector the chance to drill on tracts in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. However, it said Wednesday that no company submitted a bid to do so. The deadline to submit bids to drill was Monday.

“The lack of interest from oil companies in development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge reflects what we and they have known all along — there are some places too special and sacred to put at risk with oil and gas drilling,” Laura Daniel-Davis, acting deputy secretary of the Interior Department, said in a written statement. Whether to allow drilling in the refuge has been a source of partisan conflict for many years.

Republicans, who generally support drilling there, have argued it’s an opportunity to access more oil.

Democrats, who have generally opposed it, have pointed to unique wildlife that can be found there including grizzly bears, polar bears, gray wolves, caribou and more than 200 species of birds. In addition, the area contains land considered sacred by the Gwich’in people.

Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5074074-alaska-wildlife-refuge-interior-department-drilling/



Link to Department of Interior PRESS RELEASE - Arctic Refuge Lease Sale Yields No Interest
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Companies decline to drill in Alaska wildlife refuge (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 8 OP
SHitler will FORCE them to. nt CousinIT Jan 8 #1
Corporations think there are some places too special and sacred to put at risk with oil and in2herbs Jan 8 #2
More likely...... SergeStorms Jan 8 #5
between regulatory risk and oil crossing peak demand IbogaProject Jan 8 #6
"some places too special and sacred to put at risk" JoseBalow Jan 8 #3
Good Lulu KC Jan 8 #4

in2herbs

(3,271 posts)
2. Corporations think there are some places too special and sacred to put at risk with oil and
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:26 PM
Jan 8

and gas drilling?

What has she been smoking? If it was cost effective for corporations to rape the land at this time they would jump at the chance. Nothing is sacred or special to corporations. Only greed.

SergeStorms

(19,373 posts)
5. More likely......
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 04:01 PM
Jan 8

is that access to these areas is just not economically feasible for them. The permafrost is melting, making it too difficult to bring in the heavy equipment necessary for drilling and pumping the available crude. Building roads that will continuously sink deeper into the ground isn't cost effective.

It's never about their environmental concerns, believe me. 😉

IbogaProject

(3,908 posts)
6. between regulatory risk and oil crossing peak demand
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 06:23 PM
Jan 8

Either 2024 or 2025 will be peak oil consumption. It is also getting much harder to get the oil out overall so the easy profits are getting harder and harder to achieve. While Solar, Wind and storage have been growing slowly, now the rate of new solar is exploding more was installed in 2024 then every year up to now in total. Solar flattens the peak pricing as the power and the load peak at similar times of the day, storage helps carry it into the evening enough to really alter market pricing while still being somewhat small. Now the whole oil and gas thing will slowly unravel and shrink which is a death knell under growth addicted capitalism.

JoseBalow

(5,948 posts)
3. "some places too special and sacred to put at risk"
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:27 PM
Jan 8

LOL! As if they care

They just don't want to risk spending the money on getting the infrastructure to drill in place, only to have the policy reversed again some time down the road.

The idea that these oil companies give a single fuck about anything other than profits is absurd.

Lulu KC

(5,466 posts)
4. Good
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:56 PM
Jan 8

It would not be cost-effective, and they know it.

It's the people and the caribou who have held my interest for over 30 years. Thank goodness it is not cost-effective.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Companies decline to dril...