We can't object as election deniers. It's not our theory, and not supported at all.

14A Sec 3 is the best opportunity but was emasculated by GOP 6R SCOTUS.

You need a theory, belief, facts to hang your hat. J6 Committee reported it and all the world saw it with their own eyes.

Not good enough.

made after Jan 6, 2020, challenges of any kind will be MUCH harder.

If President Trump were miraculously disqualified by the congress the VP Vance would be sworn in anyway. Out of the frying pan and into the fire ......

because rwnj spiked its drink, the Dems will support the insanity and hope the Constitution snaps the hell out of it.

Objects. Strongly. And as long as the Democratic party keeps bending over like the billionaires the Republicans are going to continue to take advantage.

That’s because Democrats are champions of democracy and respect the will of the people – no matter how wrong the people are.

There's no way you can slice this as anything but a denial of the Constitution.

Maxine Waters will almost certainly object.

That includes Maxine Waters.

It now takes 20% in the House (dumb new law we passed), rather than just one. It did not get the 20% obviously, but if some members objected, it was private.

T

Objections, if any are made publicly when the VP announces the results of a state. If there are enough objections it moves to a non public session.

Speci, the VP reads the votes by each state in alphabetical order: Starting with Alabama, Harris will open the certificates and hand them down to one of the tellers. After the teller announces the result, Harris will ask if there are any objections. If there are objections as there were in 2021, this would be when they're heard.

If the new, higher threshold for an objection is reached the VP would announce that the two chambers will deliberate separately on the pending objection and report its decision back to the joint session. The Senate would withdraw from the joint session and return to its chamber. Both chambers would get up to two hours to debate whether to uphold the objection. It requires the vote of half of each chamber to sustain an objection.

They said the process changed with the new law. No one corrected them, but they were incorrect, my bad.

A convicted felon is about to take us down the road to ruin and we still feel the need be polite? Then I guess we have it coming. Sorry.

According to the illusion of section three of the14th Amendment - oh, sorry - the “concept” of section three, as a convicted felon, what’s his name should never have been allowed to hold office ever again. We had years to confront the situation with earnest, but chose to be polite and let them rub it in our face. We deserve what we are about to get, or lose, depending on your point of view.

The time to fight is over. We watched it happen. We will now watch on the sidelines as we sink into a fascist state. As acting VP, Harris should at the very least try to rub some shit in their faces before she departs, but that would be impolite. Sometimes I feel like a British soldier during the Revolutionary war.

We had our chance to stand up for our Constitution and blew it. What’s coming up next will be ugly.

Biggest pussy in Government AND a Republican.