General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's the real Democratic autopsy - Doug Sosnik
(snip)
A good political rule of thumb is that a handful of moments determine the outcome of an election, and they seldom happen in a campaigns final days or weeks. That held true in 2024. There were three decisions President Joe Biden made that ultimately determined his partys fate.
The first was his choice to run for a second term. Campaigning in Michigan in March 2020, the then-77-year-old said he viewed himself as a transitional figure, a bridge to a new generation. That tapped into the American zeitgeist. The country was exhausted from Trumps first term and viewed the former vice president as an acceptable short-term fix. Nothing more. Voters werent looking for a return to normal or a defender of the status quo. They were, and remain, desperate for a generational change in leadership.
(snip)
That led to the second factor that proved decisive in 2024. After taking office, Biden, under pressure from reform groups, immediately relaxed or rescinded a series of Trump administration immigration enforcement policies. This led to an unprecedented increase in illegal immigration that reversed more than a decade of decline. Pew estimates that the unauthorized immigration population in the United States reached approximately 14 million in 2023, up from 10.2 million in 2019. By the time the White House adopted emergency border restrictions in 2024, the damage had been done.
(snip)
The third factor that led to the Democrats 2024 defeat was the partys misreading of the 2022 midterms. In the run-up to those elections, the public had grown increasingly concerned about Bidens age. There was a broad expectation that Democrats were going to lose, and badly, putting more pressure on the president not to run for a second term.
But in June, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, supplying an animating issue for the Democrats that fall. The party was further aided by a favorable Senate map and poor Republican candidate recruitment in federal and state races. The Democrats went on to outperform historical trends for the party in power, and the White House touted the success as a sign of support for Bidens presidency. It used the results as a cudgel against anyone daring to primary him in 2024.
More..
https://archive.ph/cKgqY
====
Doug Sosnik, a senior adviser to President Bill Clinton from 1994 to 2000, is a counselor to the Brunswick Group.
everyonematters
(4,301 posts)usonian
(27,045 posts)A good Republican by this standard.
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
https://pylimitics.net/wilhoits-law/
He used massive resources to prosecute ABSOLUTE NOBODIES, all of whose convictions were pardoned, while the guilty parties were UNTOUCHED.
Had he done his job, none of this crap would have come about.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,409 posts)And the results would have been exactly the same:
No Trump trial before the election.
AGs do not control the courts, including the speed at which rulings, appeals and trial schedules are determined.
Garland is not the villain of the story of how Trump escaped Justice - he did his job, despite obstruction and interference from both pro-Trump careerists FBI staff, but especially from the courts.
You should know better.