Do the Democrats need a "national' message or should they target each individual race?
This is not meant as criticism, and certainly is not bashing, but is simply a strategic political question.
Should the Democrats have a message for all the voters of this country or try to target their message to each individual race?
In my opinion, we should shoot for a larger audience. But, I can understand why candidates such as Talarico and Platner might need to respond to the attacks in their own races?
Also, I think we should have a national message that appeals to all Americans, including MAGA, that would address issues that are of concern to everyone, such as gas prices. I do think corruption has to be addressed and should be a national issue also. Democrats are covering most of the bases, in my opinion, but they need a bigger message.
I think Jon Ossoff has a "national" message, as does Gavin Newsom. Perhaps a few others?
Just my two cents.
= new reply since forum marked as read
AND a targeted message in each individual race.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=21306990
It might take the party bigwigs actually working their asses off instead of "executizing"
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10114421
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆
Please read. I am wearing out my keyboard making the case.
Between elections, the party VANISHES, while the opposition blasts its message 24 by 7 by 365.
We are as a party dead silent on issues that we all hold dear and hold in common.
"But the primaries!"
F that. By then it's too late, Pox News has defined all the issues and smeared all the candidates to hell.
THIS IS WHY WE LOSE. PERIOD.
Like a boxer, leading with their jaw.
Dozing. Manning bass boats to attack the German navy.
FUCKING WAKE UP.
