Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SamuelTheThird

(1,419 posts) Sun Jun 14, 2026, 04:53 PM Yesterday

Holy shit, if this is true, Trump truly doesn't want his birthday spoiled

President Trump may be preparing to unilaterally declare a lifting of the naval blockade against Iran, to prevent an attack on Israel – Ynet

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holy shit, if this is true, Trump truly doesn't want his birthday spoiled (Original Post) SamuelTheThird Yesterday OP

And yet the stated action will neither prevent an attack on Israel, nor prevent Israel from RockRaven Yesterday #1

All true but this hysterical desperation will make negotiations going forward quite interesting SamuelTheThird Yesterday #2

Didn't Iran just recently receive billions?....................... Lovie777 Yesterday #3

RockRaven

(19,939 posts)

1. And yet the stated action will neither prevent an attack on Israel, nor prevent Israel from

Reply to SamuelTheThird (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2026, 04:56 PM

Yesterday

attacking Lebanon or Iran or anyone else that would predictably precipitate an Iranian retaliation.

As usual with The Dotard, the statement "doing X because Y" rests on a totally fictional causal relationship between X and Y.

SamuelTheThird

(1,419 posts)

2. All true but this hysterical desperation will make negotiations going forward quite interesting

Reply to RockRaven (Reply #1)

Sun Jun 14, 2026, 05:02 PM

Yesterday

Lovie777

(24,213 posts)

3. Didn't Iran just recently receive billions?.......................

Reply to SamuelTheThird (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2026, 05:07 PM

Yesterday

Reply to this discussion