General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSocial Security's 2027 COLA Is on Pace to Be Historic and Devastating, Courtesy of President Donald Trump
Last year was filled with history-making moments for America's leading retirement program, Social Security. In addition to Social Security celebrating its 90th "birthday," 2025 marked the first time that the average monthly retired-worker benefit exceeded $2,000.
History was made this year, as well, with a fifth consecutive year in which Social Security's cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) met or surpassed 2.5% -- something that hadn't been witnessed in almost three decades. Social Security's COLA is essentially the annual raise given to beneficiaries to counter the effects of inflation (rising prices) and prevent a loss of purchasing power.
Early independent estimates suggest that Social Security's 2027 COLA will be historically high, thanks in part to decisions made by President Donald Trump. However, a beefier raise comes with potentially devastating consequences for America's top retirement program.
This may be the fourth-highest COLA in the last 36 years
When the prevailing inflation rate rises, so does Social Security's cost-of-living adjustment. While a modest level of inflation is normal and healthy for the U.S. economy, two policy decisions by President Trump have provided a boost to inflation, and thus Social Security's 2027 COLA forecast.
https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/social-securitys-2027-cola-pace-105600481.html
niyad
(135,153 posts)Let's see. Say the cola is 3%. A person getting $1k/month will get $30/month/$1/day/$0.04/hr. A person making $2k/month will receive double those figures. OH JOY!!! RAPTURE!!!
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??? We are supposed to be thrilled, excited, overflowing with gratitude??? IT'S OUR FUCKING MONEY. WE EARNED IT!! In the meantime, billionaires get trillions in tax cuts.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(138,593 posts)That's after the Medicare premium deduction.
OLDMDDEM
(3,328 posts)niyad
(135,153 posts)niyad
(135,153 posts)is they don't happen to be people in my circle of acquaintance. Their existence does not change the numbers for the people I know.
Response to niyad (Reply #4)
niyad This message was self-deleted by its author.
roamer65
(37,979 posts)The more you make, the more you pay.
It would be a wonderful mechanism for wealth redistribution.
niyad
(135,153 posts)It is absolute fucking BS that there should be ANY restrictions on earnings, inheritance, winnings, etc. Social security was meant to be a floor, not a ceiling. We EARNED that money, and putting restrictions on acquiring any more is punitive and discriminatory. There is NO ceiling on the wealthy.
maxrandb
(17,540 posts)My mom's Social Security, plus small pension doesn't increase enough to, put her a couple of dollars over the Medicaid income limit. She won't be able to afford the $8,000 a month for her Nursing Home "rent".